Thinking
when we pay attention to the stimuli around us, we engage in a process known as thinking
decision making
the process of identifying and choosing alternatives based on the values and preferences of the decision-maker
Problem solving
The Dual Process Model of thinking and decision making
The Dual Process Model of thinking and decision making postulates that there are two basic modes of thinking - what Stanovich and West (2000) refer to as “System 1” and “System 2.”
System 1
heuristics
are mental short-cuts that involve focusing on one aspect of a complex problem and ignoring others (Lewis, 2008).
When do we use system 1
Gilbert and Gill (2000) have argued that we become more likely to use System 1 thinking when our cognitive load is high - that is, when we have lots of different things to think about at the same time, or we have to process information and make a decision quickly.
System 2
Final about the systems
It is important to remember that we often use both of these systems when addressing a problem. System 1 will reach a quick conclusion and then System 2 will go into further analysis to hopefully reach a “more correct” conclusion. Because System 1 is activated before System 2 can do its work, often System 1 interferes with the effectiveness of System 2.
Atler & Oppenheimer aim
to investigate how font affects thinking
atler & Oppenheimer procedure
40 Princeton students completed the cognitive reflections test (CRT)
Wason aim
to investigate the role of intuitive and rational thinking in decision making
Wason procedure
Wason results
Less than 10% of participants used rational thinking and gave the correct answer - majority of participants made an intuitive judgement without reasoning as an automatic response to the wording of the question
Wason conlcusion
Decision making can be influenced by the system used to process information. Wason also found that even when he explained to the participants how to approach questions like the ones in the selection task, many participants still gave an incorrect answer, demonstrating how system 1 can powerfully interfere with system 2