Unit 2: Cases Flashcards

(7 cards)

1
Q

Jooste v Botha

A

Not all kinds of “harm” recognised in DLR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Van Jaarsveld v Bridges

A

Previously old policy justifications allowed for Breach of promise to stand alone, However though developing common law, it has now been stablished that Breach of Promise requires INSULTING BEHAVIOUR to accompany it. Hence insulting behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Fourie v Naranjo

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Prinsloo v Goldex
Custom Credit v Shembe

A

Res Iudicata

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Warneke

A

Lex Aquilia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Le Roux v Dey

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly