The transatlantic trade network
The transatlantic trade network connected the continents of Africa, the Americas, and Europe through trade. It is sometimes nicknamed the “triangle trade” or “triangular trade” because it connected these continents in the shape of a triangle.
When Europeans first made contact with the Americas in 1492, they began to extract resources from the continents. Raw materials were shipped from the Americas to Europe. These materials were processed and shipped to Africa. From Africa, these manufactured goods, and especially enslaved people, were shipped under harsh conditions to the Americas. But how did this trade network come to exist? And why were enslaved people subjected to such cruelty?
Mercantilism depended on trade. The need to trade resulted in the creation of the transatlantic trade network. Under mercantilism, exports became more important than imports in order to increase a country’s wealth. The flow of goods across the Atlantic became necessary as this economic system grew. Colonies provided raw materials for the mother country who in turn created manufactured goods. It is important to note that most of the profits from this trade went to the mother country. In the coming centuries, people also began to settle in the Americas, and Europeans continued to create new colonies in order to expand their wealth.
Slavery dates back to the earliest civilizations, first appearing in Mesopotamia over 8,000 years ago. Mercantilism and the growth of colonies in the Americas led to a demand in slave labor. The Spanish first used Indigenous Americans as forced labor. Why were Africans taken
When they showed little immunity to European diseases, they were replaced with enslaved Africans. Cultivating crops such as sugar, which was especially common in the Caribbean, was labor intensive. The practice of slavery grew in the Americas with plantations. Slavery was a way to cut labor costs. This led to the growth of the slave trade, and thus the transatlantic trade network. Enslaved Africans were taken to the Americas. In the Americas, they were forced to work to cultivate raw materials. Then those raw materials were taken back across the Atlantic to create manufactured goods.
The Middle Passage was a name given to the “middle” trade route across the Atlantic, connecting Africa and the Americas.
The demand for enslaved people led to an estimated 10 to 12 million people forcibly transported along this route in horrible conditions. People were crammed tightly into the bottom of ships, often without room to stand or lay. Their food and water rations were meager. Sanitary conditions were poor, leading to the spread of disease. Enslaved people faced psychological and physical abuse by the crew.
The transatlantic trade network impacted economic systems.
It led to mercantilism becoming the dominant economic system. As a result, more and more colonies were created. Many European countries became wealthy, though this wealth came at the cost of Indigenous peoples and enslaved Africans. It led countries to compete with one another over resources. They came to view possession of colonies as a point of national pride and power. This later led to the development of nationalism.
The Middle Passage led to the widespread African diaspora. T
This was the massive movement of African peoples and cultures around the world as a result of the slave trade. In some places, African cultures became influential on the local culture, such as in the Caribbean. In others, African cultures, languages, and religions were suppressed. In the American colonies, many enslaved people were forbidden from speaking their native language and were forcibly converted to Christianity. This led to the destruction of some African cultures. As a result, modern Black American culture emerged. While it is influenced in some ways by African cultures, it also fused with elements of European American cultures when enslaved people were forced to assimilate.
What was the Middle Passage?
It was the sea journey that transported enslaved people from Africa to the Americas.
What was traded along the transatlantic trade network?
manufactured goods, raw materials, and enslaved people
Search online to investigate the Middle Passage in more detail. What else did you learn about how enslaved people were treated on the Middle Passage?
Enslaved people were chained together to prevent rebellion. The rations they were given could shrink if the trip was delayed, leading some to starve. Some enslaved people committed suicide to escape the torture and enslavement while on the journey.
The Slave Trade as a Financial Transaction
Due to the growing demand of cash crops, plantation owners began using the importation of enslaved Africans as a financial transaction. Often these transactions resulted in large profits for the slave traders, despite the terrible human cost.
Although the African slave trade exploited enslaved people, the large-scale forced migration, known as diaspora, of enslaved Africans to the Americas and the Caribbean islands influenced the diverse American culture today.
The African diaspora in the Americas comprises a large proportion of the total population. In Jamaica, a majority of the population is of African descent. This historical development has left many traces in the distinctive culture of these regions, in terms of music, tradition, and religion.
While cultural diversity was a positive long-term impact of diaspora, there were some negative long-term impacts
In the nineteenth century slavery was abolished, but other forms of labor exploitation, such as indentured servitude, were developed to recruit labor for large plantations. Black people faced disparities and inequalities such as access to rights and privileges as citizens. During the Reconstruction Era, Black people faced discriminatory practices that segregated them from White people. These practices continued as a form of exploitation that contributed greatly to disparities in wealth and opportunity between persons of different racial backgrounds.
Why did plantation owners look to Africa for workers to harvest sugar in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries?
Harvesting sugar was a labor-intensive process. As indigenous populations declined due to diseases, plantation owners imported enslaved Africans as a cheap labor force.
Identify two places where the African slave trade was most prominent during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries to meet rising sugar production demands in Europe.
The two locations where African slave trade was the most prominent were in South America (Brazil) and in the Caribbean (Barbados and Jamaica).
Consider the firsthand accounts of the enslaved person and the European traveler. Conduct research online to investigate various perspectives of the African slave trade. Analyze the accounts to determine how it shaped and continued to shape people’s perspectives over time. What impact did this have on the African diaspora over time?
The account of the enslaved person, Olaudah Equiano, reveals his perspective as one of fear and resentment at being treated like an animal rather than a human being. By contrast the perspective of the European traveler, Hans Sloan, was less sympathetic. Although he noted the harsh punishments issued to enslaved people, he rationalized this by arguing that some punishments were merited. Such contrasting views reflected the conflicting interests of slave owners and enslaved people. By preserving the economic advantages of White European settlers over African Americans across generations, the legacy of slavery continued to impact the African diaspora even after the institution was abolished in the nineteenth century.
Some historians have pointed out a “gun and enslavement cycle” in which Africans traded enslaved peoples for European firearms.
This allowed them to gain power over their neighbors and expand their territory, and in doing so capture more prisoners of war. The cycle goes like this: First, Africans traded enslaved Africans to Europeans for firearms. Then, African nations gained power over their neighbors, in turn expanding their territory. In this expansion process, African nations would enslave more people, whom they could then trade for European firearms, and begin the cycle again. This supports the argument that warfare and the slave trade were linked, as empowered coastal kingdoms pushed into the interior of Africa.
Africans traded for a diverse range of European goods, such as cloth, metal containers, alcohol, and tobacco. However, it was the trade of firearms that fueled local territorial conflicts.
Most Portuguese records say nothing about the trading, as the pope banned the trade of firearms with non-Christians in 1179. However, reports in West Africa show European nations did not heed the pope’s commands. Kwaland records show that the Portuguese firearm trade began in the sixteenth century and rapidly expanded in the latter half of the seventeenth century. In 1658, an English cargo ship heading for Cormantin carried 1,550 muskets.
While historians may argue over the effectiveness of firearms in warfare due to their inaccuracies, it is undoubtable that the firearm trade drastically changed West African societies.
Firearms became symbols of royalty and prestige, as only the wealthiest had access to a number of firearms. Firearms were used in numerous ceremonies and celebrations as a way to make dramatic noise and pyrotechnics. A few kingdoms, such as Asante and Dahomey, used these firearms to build more disciplined armies. Even farmers carried firearms while working in their fields. In addition, hunting fundamentally changed and hunters were employed to protect crops from wild animals.
Kongo has a long history of enslavement. However, this trade was closely monitored by local tribes and was not for an international slave trade market. During the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, few freeborn Kongos were sold to an international market. When the Kongo was at peace and the state had firm control over the trade, few freeborn people were enslaved.
The kings of Kongo sought to protect their free people from illegal enslavement. In addition to King Afonso’s 1526 letter to the king of Portugal appealing to him as a fellow Christian, seventeenth-century kings struggled to protect their people. The kings came to realize that they had to obtain slaves in order to pay for allegiances with important European nations as well as pay for commodities. Even King Afonso sent frequent gifts of enslaved individuals to the Portuguese king to cover the expenses of diplomatic agents’ work in Portugal. However, he had a relatively tight handle on this trade and could use only foreign-born enslaved peoples to meet these quotas. From Afonso’s rule to the eighteenth century, Kongo had two forms of currency: nzimbu shells, which were the traditional form of currency used for local commerce, and enslaved individuals for international commerce and diplomatic obligations. The Catholic Church, in a legal matter in 1571 involving the bishop of São Tomé, even accepted enslaved peoples as a form of tax payment. This need for enslaved peoples was met through war captives but also through the purchase of individuals.
The Jaga invasion,
The Jaga invasion, or uprising, between 1568 and 1570 led to the first large-scale enslavement of freeborn Kongos. Jaga included various peoples (the Yaka, Suku, Teke, Kuba, Luba, and Hungaan tribes) east and south of the Kongo whom the Portuguese referred to collectively as the Jaga. In 1568, after being the target of the Kongo slave trade, the warriors pushed back and invaded Kongo and Angola. The Portuguese aided Kongo in pushing back the invaders, thus restoring the Kongo monarchy.
Why might the Portuguese have invested resources into restoring the Kongo monarchy?
There is disagreement among historians over the terminology regarding this event in history. It’s clear that people in Kongo did not want the monarchy. However, great confusion exists over whether or not the Portuguese inflated this story of the “Jaga invasion” since Kongo records were destroyed during the conflict. It’s even unclear who the “Jaga” were, as this was a Portuguese term that grouped many people together. This leads to disagreements among historians over whether the event was an internal rebellion, or uprising, or an actual invasion by other people.
Why do you think there is so much confusion? What consequences might there be for our understanding of African politics? If this was a rebellion, rather than an invasion, how might this change the way the Portuguese are viewed, as they helped to restore a monarchy that was being overthrown?
In the early seventeenth century, when Kongo stopped territorial expansion, the expectation of using enslaved people as a form of currency remained.
Kongolese elites manipulated laws, expanding the crimes for which freeborn Kongos could be enslaved. For instance, in Angola, people found guilty of stealing were condemned to death, but in Kongo, the punishment was enslavement. Sources from the 1640s share that the actions that led to enslavement were quite subjective. The king ordinarily enslaved people who did not show “due respect and obedience,” and others could be enslaved if a family member was condemned to death as a form of repaying debts. Even public duels could lead to the enslavement of the people who lost.
In spite of this, kings continued to try to protect their people. After a series of dynastic conflicts during which rival parties enslaved one another, King Pedro II was put into power in 1622, and he wrote to both the pope and King Philip of Spain complaining that the governor of Angola, a Portuguese colony, invaded the Kongo and illegally enslaved nobles and free people in order to send them to Brazil.
King Philip successfully tracked down some of these people in Brazil and returned them to the Kongo, but many were sent to other regions of the Americas.
Civil wars that began in the late seventeenth century would also feed this enslavement process, as rebels were condemned to slavery. Civil war broke out in Kongo in 1665, lasting until 1709.
Historians have connected this war with the slave trade, as groups fought over control of the traffic of the enslaved and sold their captured enemies. In effect, the state collapsed, and contenders who rose to power enslaved their rivals. In addition, kings and political rivals enslaved Kongolese people to sell to foreign merchants and to use as gifts for both missionaries and political allies. They were also sold for manning armies and to serve as status symbols. The mechanisms put into place in the previous centuries to protect freeborn Kongos collapsed, while the demand for enslaved people increased with the need for weapons during the civil war. As one historian, Linda M. Heywood, stated, “The distinctions between foreign-born slaves and freeborn Kongos disappeared. Ultimately every Kongo was a potential slave.”