federalists
Led by James Madison and Alexander Hamilton, the Federalists wanted a strong national government to unite the states. This group denounced the Articles of Confederation, the country’s first constitution, as they felt it promoted a weak central government.
What was the Anti-Federalists’ important achievement?
They successfully got a Bill of Rights added to the Constitution.
What did Federalists hope to achieve with their writing?
They wanted Americans to support ratifying the Constitution.
Anti-Federalists
Meanwhile, the Anti-Federalists, led by Patrick Henry and George Mason, warned that a strong federal government could abuse power, much like the British government they had just ousted. They championed the Articles of Confederation, as it encouraged states’ rights.
Which faction was most successful in achieving its goals during the Great Debate? Use evidence to reason effectively.
The Federalists got the Constitution ratified. The Anti-Federalists created a Bill of Rights. In my opinion, the Anti-Federalists were more successful in achieving its goals. Three states—Massachusetts, Virginia, and New York—decided that they wanted a Bill of Rights as a condition of ratifying the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists started a national conversation that resulted in the Bill of Rights. It is used to this day, in addition to later amendments.
As the debate raged on, it was clear a compromise was needed.
Once the Constitution was ratified, or made official, in 1788, a Bill of Rights was tacked on in 1791. These first 10 amendments were designed to protect personal freedoms like religion and speech.
Democracy was not a new concept in the late eighteenth century. The Greeks first proposed the idea of democracy around 507 BCE. The Greek word demokratia meant “rule by the people.” It was the idea that people in a society could govern themselves. However, not all the people were intended to participate in government. Only people who fit a certain criteria were expected to participate.
The ancient Greeks limited political participation to free male citizens over the age of 18, or about 10% to 20% of the population. Around 25% of those living in Greece were enslaved at the time.
Ancient Greek demokratia was an egalitarian form of government.
Greece did not have a king or a single ruler. Instead, the people ruled together. It was a direct democracy because people directly voted on the government and participated in it. They did not elect representatives to speak for them. T
The Greek government was divided into three parts:
ekklesia
Any free male citizen over 18 could participate in the ekklesia. The ekklesia wrote laws, changed them as needed, and handled foreign policy. They made decisions by simple majority. They met only about 40 times per year, or less than once per week. The boule, however, met each day. They did most of the work to make the government function each day.
boule
The boule took care of most government affairs; they also decided which issues the ekklesia needed to handle. A random lottery selected the 500 men chosen to serve in the boule. These men were members of the ten tribes of Athens. The boule had an equal number of men from each tribe. The Athenians believed that a lottery was democratic because everyone was chosen by chance. Everyone had the same chance of being chosen.
dikasteria
The dikasteria, the court system in Athens, used juries selected from a group of citizens. Potential jurors had to be men at least 30 years old. Every day, 500 citizens were chosen to serve as jurors. Beyond that, the court system was not very firmly structured. Citizens could take each other to court for any reason. Jurors got paid for their time, but not very much money.
The Roman Republic included a Senate and four other government assemblies.
The Roman Republic included a Senate and four other government assemblies. These assemblies offered political roles for a large variety of Romans. Any adult male who was present in Rome could vote in the Roman assemblies. The Roman Republic also had a type of executive branch, including two elected consuls, who oversaw the rest of the government. Like Athens, there was also a court system in the Roman Republic, but trials were not run by government officials.
The Romans also used democracy in their government around the same time. There were some differences in how the two city-states practiced democracy, however. The Romans called their system a rēspūblica, a word we know today as “republic.” At that time, the term literally meant “thing of the people.”
Romans were born as citizens. Other individuals in the Roman Republic could become citizens or become citizens by choice when freed from slavery. Women and enslaved people could not participate in the government. Between 20-30% of people were enslaved in the Roman Empire. Like ancient Greece, only free men were included in political activity.
Rome divided citizens into classes, including the patricians and the plebeians:
This class-focused approach to dividing the government’s power also set the Roman government apart from Athens’. Rome was not simply a democracy where every man over a certain age could participate in government. Rather, it was a
Rather, it was a republic, where people were elected to certain roles, and those elected were often from the upper classes. Although there were opportunities for plebeians to participate in the government, they had less power than the aristocratic patricians.
Classical republicanism
Classical republicanism developed during this period. As Enlightenment thinkers engaged with classical Greek and Roman works, they began thinking about how Greek and Roman political ideas could shape their world. The British became very interested in classical republicanism. This occurred during a period when their own government was changing. Many British thinkers in the seventeenth century were interested in the role of government. They also wrote about the relationship between government and the people in a society. Classical republicanism included an emphasis on characteristics such as integrity and virtue. Enlightenment thinkers used these ideas to argue for ways to improve government. Some believed that government would be better with a foundation in classical republican ideals.
The belief in the connection between political participation and independence led to a Constitution based on the separation of powers. Both ancient Athens and Rome had used this approach, dividing governmental power into specific arenas. In the American model, separation of powers included the creation of three branches:
Yet these men worried about majority rule and were cautious when it came to democracy. They believed that some political voice was important for citizens. However, democracy on its own seemed problematic. They were concerned about unchecked democracy and did not trust most Americans to focus on public interest.
A mixed government was one way to address this concern. Allowing Americans to elect representatives, while state legislatures selected senators, helped control the people’s power. Having judges selected by the president and confirmed by the Senate also limited the use of democracy.
electoral college
The electoral college perhaps best represents how early Americans focused on a republican form of government. While all citizens could vote for the president, the Electoral College developed as an additional way to check the power of the people’s will. Individual Americans vote for a president every four years. However, a small number of representatives from each state form the Electoral College. The people in the Electoral College determine the president. A presidential candidate must have a certain amount of electoral votes in order to become president. A candidate can win the popular vote election, but lose the Electoral College.
As Americans debated whether to ratify the Constitution, many began to call for the addition of a Bill of Rights. Ultimately, the Bill of Rights, the first ten amendments to the Constitution, was added. The Bill of Rights drew from ancient Roman ideas of natural law.
Cicero developed the concept of natural law in the first century BCE. The idea of natural law is that rules for human behavior are not based on changing criteria. There are rules for how humans should behave, particularly toward one another. Those rules are based in objective, unchanging truths or norms.
By the time of the Enlightenment, these ideas had developed in a number of ways. During the Enlightenment, natural law became the foundation of natural rights.
John Locke, for example, argued that natural rights included life, liberty, and property. During the 1770s, Thomas Jefferson adapted this idea in the Declaration of Independence.
Rule of Laws
The Founding Fathers adapted the ideas of rule of law from Ancient Greece and the philosopher, Aristotle, in his writings, Politics, he asked if laws or people are better at ruling. Aristotle wrote that there are benefits to both methods, but that ultimately it is better to be ruled by laws because they can be applied equally to all citizens.
During the Enlightenment, John Locke took Aristotle’s idea of being ruled by the best laws and developed the concept of Rule of Law. He wrote that it was important for all members of society to be held accountable to the same laws. It does not matter if you are a monarch, a religious leader, or a farmer. The law should be enforced equally. This is referred to as Equality before the Law.
1.
Where was democracy first used as part of a government?
Ancient Greece/Athens