Land - Freehold Covenants
What is a covenant?
Are they capable of being legal interests in land?
Relevant formality?
A promise to do or not do something.
Not capable of being legal interests in land.
In writing and signed.
Land - Freehold Covenants
Who are the covenantor and the covenantee?
Covenantor - the person who makes the promise and who has the burden of the covenant
Covenantee - the recipient of the promise and who has the benefit of the covenant.
Land - Freehold Covenants
What is annexation (covenants)?
When can it be enforced?
If the land benefitting from the covenant is sold, the covenantee’s successor can enforce the covenant at common law if:
- the covenant touches and concerns the land
- there must have been an intention that the benefit should run with the estate owned by the covenantee;
- the covenantee must have a legal estate in benefitted land
- the buyer of the benefitted land must also take a legal title in the benefitted land
Land - Freehold Covenants
Positive vs restrictive covenants?
Positive - requires some effort or expenditure to perform the obligation.
Restrictive - requires no effort or expense.
Land - Freehold Covenants
Who are the parties to a contract (covenants)?
The original covenantor and the original covenantee.
Land - Freehold Covenants
Can the burden of a covenant (positive or negative) pass at common law?
No.
To enforce a covenant against a successor in title ‘would be to enforce a personal obligation against a person who has not covenanted’.
Land - Freehold Covenants
When will the burden of a restrictive covenant pass?
In equity under the doctrine in Tulk v Moxhay, provided the following requirements are satisfied:
- the covenant must be negative (restrictive) in substance;
- the covenant must, at the time of the creation of the covenant, have been made to benefit dominant land retained by the covenantee;
- the covenant must touch and concern the dominant land;
- the covenant must be made with the intent to burden the servient land; and
- the owner of the servient land must have notice of the covenant for it to bind them.
Land - Freehold Covenants
Can the covenantee prevent breach of a negative covenant when they have no retained land after sale?
No.
Land - Freehold Covenants
What is the test for whether a covenant touches and concerns the land?
Land - Freehold Covenants
What 3 devices evolved at the common law to allow positive covenants to be enforced against successors in title?
Land - Freehold Covenants
What does the doctrine of mutual benefit and burden (Halsall v Brizzell) dictate?
That a person who wishes to take advantage of a service/facility which benefits their land must also comply with any corresponding obligation.
Land - Freehold Covenants
What are the 2 pre-conditions to the doctrine in Halsall v Brizzell?
Land - Freehold Covenants
What are the 2 rules of the running of the benefit at common law?
Land - Freehold Covenants
What are the 3 sets of rules for the running of the benefit in equity?
Land - Freehold Covenants
What are the 3 methods of annexation in equity?
Land - Freehold Covenants
What is assignment (running of benefit at common law)?
Requirements for it to be enforceable?
The benefit of a covenant to pass to a successor by express assignment.
Must be in writing and signed by the assignee and written notice of the assignment must be given to the person with the burden of the covenant.
Land - Freehold Covenants
Express annexation vs implied annexation vs statutory annexation
Express - covenant should express an intention to benefit a defined piece of land
Implied - the court has been willing to imply annexation where such annexation was obviously intended and it would be an injustice to ignore that intention.
Statutory - the effect of s78 LPA 1925 - automatically annex a freehold covenant to each and every part of the land retained by the covenantee provided the following is met:
- the covenant must have been created after the implementation of the LPA; and
- the covenant must touch and concern the land.
Land - Freehold Covenants
How may the burden of a restrictive covenant pass?
Only in equity, not at common law.
When the original covenantee sells the dominant land the successor in title needs to demonstrate that they have the benefit of the covenant in equity.
Land - Freehold Covenants
How may the burden of a positive covenant pass?
Neither at common law or in equity when the original covenantor sells the servient land.
The original covenantor remains bound by privity of contract in relation to positive covenants.
A successor in title to the dominant land can pursue the original covenantor for breach of a positive covenant provided that the successor in title can show that the benefit of the positive covenant has passed to them at common law.
Land - Freehold Covenants
What are the remedies for breach of a positive covenant? Who can they be sought against?
Will the main remedy always be available?
Once the original covenantee has disposed of the land benefitting the covenant - would be unable to demonstrate they have suffered a loss.
Land - Freehold Covenants
What is the principal remedy available for breach of a restrictive covenant?
When can it be applied for?
What may a court award instead? When?
INJUNCTION.
No automatic right (within court’s discretion) - can be applied for in anticipation of a breach or in response to an existing breach.
Court will award DAMAGES instead where:
- the injury to the C’s rights are small;
- capable of being estimated of money
- can be adequately compensated by money; and
- it would be oppressive to the respondent to grant an injunction.
Will not be awarded where the C has acted inequitably or has delayed action.
Land - Freehold Covenants
What is the purpose of an injunction?
To restrain the breach of a restrictive covenant.
Land - Freehold Covenants
What are the methods of removing/limiting the effect of a freehold covenant?
Land - Freehold Covenants
What is s84 LPA 1925 (discharge of restrictive covenants)?
What conditions must be satisfied?
An application can be made to the Land Chamber of the Upper Tribunal to discharge or modify the covenant in whole or in part.
The burden is on the applicant to satisfy one of the grounds in s84(1) LPA 1925:
- the restrictive covenant was found to be obsolete;
- the restrictive covenant impedes some reasonable use of the land and either:
- it does not secure any practical benefit/value to the persons it should benefit; or
- it is contrary to public interest… and in either case, money will be adequate compensation; or
- that those entitled to the benefit have expressly or impliedly agreed to the discharge; or
- that the discharge will not injure the persons entitled to the benefit.