Legal actions that might be available to the injured person in a claim for compensation, and the tests that would have to be made for the actions to succeed
Legal Actions = “double-barrelled action” civil claim involving a tort of negligence AND breach of statutory duty.
Negligence:
•Duty of care owed by company to employee
•Accident was foreseeable (managers aware of bad practice)
•DoC was breached
•Breach of DoC led to injury; (must refer to scenario)
•[Case law: Wilsons & Clyde Coal v English (1938);
•General Cleaning Contractors v Christmas (1953)]
Meaning of ‘general’ and ‘special’ damages
General damages: Represent the types of damages that can’t easily be assigned a monetary value, such as pain and suffering, loss of consortium and emotional trauma. There is no evidence, such as bills or receipts, of a specific dollar amount, but they are losses for which the plaintiff deserves compensation nonetheless.
Special damages: Can be assigned a specific monetary value because these are compensation for the expenses you incurred as a result of the accident. Special damages include things like medical bills and lost wages. These are your “out of pocket” Receipt’s
What may be awarded in the event of a successful claim AND give examples of the factors that are considered in calculating their value
General Factors such as:
• Pain and suffering and loss of amenity - calculated by the severity of the injury itself and a system of tariffs has evolved to enable the court to apply some consistency to the loss of a limb or sight.
• Other factors such as pain and suffering arising from treatment or operations
• Mental suffering based on the realisation of a shortened life expectancy or a reduction in the ability to enjoy life
• Loss of amenity: the injured person , as a result of the injury, is no longer able to enjoy their previous lifestyle e.g. impairment of any of the physical senses or abilities, impairment of sexual activity, inability to pursue sports pastimes or hobbies to the same degree as that enjoyed prior to the accident and any future earnings
Special Factors such as:
• Damage to belongings, legal expenses, medical expenses including the cost of a carer and modifications to home; pre-trial loss of earnings.
Unsafe practice at work, safe system in place, workers NOT able to understand safe system, but do not inform employer, it’s the Norm for the unsafe practice to take place
Which breaches might apply
HSWA 1974:
•Section 2 (1) Ensure SFAIRP, the health, safety and welfare at work of all his employees.
•Section 2 (2) – Safe plant and systems of work, safe use, handling, storage and transport of articles and substances, IIT&S, Safe place of work incl. access and egress, safe environment and adequate facilities and arrangements for their welfare at work.
•Section 7 Employee take reasonable care of himself and others and to co-operate with employer
•Section 36 - Offences due to fault of other person.
•Section 37 - offence committed with consent / connivance or attributable to neglect of Director, Manager, Secretary etc.
MHSWR 1999:
•Reg 3 – S&S Risk Assessment not carried out
•Reg 4 – Apply Principals of Prevention
•Reg 5- AE-POCMR
•Reg 7 – Provide H&S Assistance
•Reg 13 – Provide health and safety training
The principles of regulatory enforcement activities.
T.P.C.- T.A
Principles of good regulation:
A fatal accident has happened at a workplace. An enforcing agency inspector decides to make a visit to the site to take statements from witnesses, including the managing director. The managing director has refused the visit.
Outline possible courses of a Faction that the inspector may pursue.
Describe the statutory procedures for making regulations under the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974
Section 15 HSWA (Schedule 3) gives power to the Secretary of State (SoS) to make regulations under the Act
Regulations must involve regulating or prohibiting H&S matters identified in Schedule 3 HSWA
•Procedure for making regulations requires the SoS to consult HSE and other government departments - Health, Industry - and other interested parties (S50 HSWA) - LAs, TUC, Confederation of British Industry etc (consultative documents may be issued)
Alternatively, regulations may be proposed to SoS by HSE
•Proposed regulations must lie in House of Commons and House of Lords for 40 days
•If no objections / vote against they pass into law
•If opposed / vote against - do not pass into law (S82 negative resolution).
Outline the general types of health and safety related information that the employer should obtain from a contractor (prior to their appointment) to ensure that they are competent to safely design and install a lift.
Section 6 HSWA
GENERAL DUTIES OF MANUFACTURERS ETC.
Any person who designs, manufactures, imports or supplies any article or substance for use at work has duties to ensure, SFAIRP:
The section covers:
•New and second-hand articles designed for use at work (including fairground equipment), whether for sale of hire and their component parts;
•Items, which though capable of domestic use are designed to be used also at work (the safety of goods intended for domestic use is covered instead by Consumer Protection legislation); and
•All substances, including micro-organisms, which are supplied to workplaces.
Section 6 HSWA
S6(1) places duties on persons who design, manufacture, (import) or supply articles for use at work
S6(3) places duties on persons who install any article for use at work in premises where it is to be used by persons at work. In this case the contractor is a designer, supplier and installer of a passenger lift (which is an article for use at work).
Requirements -
•Ensure SFAIRP that the article is designed to be safe and without risks to health at all times when it is being set up, used, cleaned or maintained by a person at work
•Carry out / arrange for any testing and examination required to meet the above duty
•Ensure that persons supplied with the article of work equipment are provided with adequate information re its use etc (as above), dismantling or disposal
• Provide, SFAIRP, revised / updated information as necessary (e.g. Serious risk arising)
•Carry out / arrange for any research necessary to eliminate / minimise risk to health or safety SFAIRP
• ensure SFAIRP that nothing in the way the work equipment is installed makes it unsafe or a risk to health during use (etc)
R v Swan Hunter Shipbuilders and Another [1982]
Contractors working for SH on board HMS Glasgow were using oxy-acetylene cutting equipment. The oxygen hose / connection was leaking in a badly ventilated part of the ship so the atmosphere became oxygen enriched. An employee of Telemeter Installations, working alongside SH employees was preparing to do some arc welding. He struck the electric arc between welding rod and work piece and immediately, due to the atmosphere, a very intense fire broke out and eight men were killed. SH employees were provided with information on the fire risk connected with oxygen but the information was not provided to the employees of Telemeter or of the other contractors involved. Swan Hunter was prosecuted and fined £3000, they appealed. Conviction was upheld in the Court of Appeal (CoA).
The case of R v Swan Hunter Shipbuilders and Another [1982] arose from a serious fire during a ship repair at Swan
Hunter’s shipyard. Swan Hunter was convicted in the Court of Appeal.
Identify the specific provisions of HSWA under which Swan Hunter were prosecuted and in each case outline the reasons why the company was convicted
Clearly SH had a duty to ensure SFAIRP the H&S of its own employees by the provision of information. The CoA held that if, to ensure a SSW for SH’s own employees, it was necessary to provide the contractors / contractors’ employees with information about any particular dangers within its knowledge, then SH was under a duty to provide
such information, SFAIRP. SH also had a duty to those not in its employment.
Consequently SH were prosecuted under:
What is required for a successful claim for negligence?
Civil Law
Meaning of Neighbour
Anyone effected by our acts or emissions
Meaning of Tort (Delict) Sco
A Civil Wrong
The Neighbour Principal
The General Duty of Care at Common Law
Donoghue v. Stevenson (1932)
Reasonable care must be taken to avoid acts or omissions which, with reasonable foresight, you would know would be likely to injure your neighbour.
The test whether someone is a neighbour in the legal sense, can be established if it can be reasonably foreseen that the act or omission may cause harm to them.
3 stage test to decide if a duty of care is owed?
Proximity – there should be sufficient proximity between the claimant and the defendant
Reasonableness – is it fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty?
Reasonable foreseeability – the harm suffered by the claimant must be reasonably foreseeable
Purpose of Civil Law and Civil Courts
To compensate for loss
What must be proven to establish a successful claim for a breach of statutory duty (civil action
Main defences to claims of breach of statutory duty (civil action)
Contributory Negligence
Davies v. Swan Motor Co (1949)
Main types of damages injured parties may claim
Meaning of Damages
Regulation 7 of the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 requires that employers appoint one or more competent persons to assist in complying with health and safety law.
Outline the legal requirements that the employer must satisfy when making such an appointment.
Covers the practitioner’s role
Key legal requirements of MHSW reg 7:
• H&S Assistant to be competent
• Appointment of one or more persons as necessary; arrangements for co-operation if 2 or more
• Numbers of H&S Assistants and time available to be sufficient for organisation’s size, risk and risk distribution.
• Information on health and safety issues to be provided to external appointees.
• Preference for internal appointment(s)
• Information on temporary workers; exemptions for partnerships where one partner is sufficiently competent