UTUC Epidemiology , Presentation, Pathology , Etiology, Eval ( Dx), Treatment
DEPPER Stepwise ( all in summary)
What is the risk of Bladder recurrence after UTUC Rx
EAU = 29 %
Risk of contralateral UTUC after Rx 6
2- 6%
Risk Stratification of UTUC
Low risk UTUC
- LG cytology
- LG histology
- unifocal
- no invasion on CT
< 2cm
High risk UTUC
- HG cytology
- HG histo
- Local invasion
- Histological subtype
- multifocal
-> 2cm
- HUN
TNM staging
Ta - non invasive papillary Uca
Tis - carcinoma insitu
T1 - Invades subepithelial connective tissue
T2 - Invades muscularis
T3 - Invades beyond the muscularis into the peripelvic fat or renal parenchyma ( ureter) tumour invades beyond muscularis into perinephric fat
T4 - Into adjacent organs or through the kidney into perinephric fat
N1 - Single LN < 2cm
N2 - Multiple LN or LN > 2cm
M1 - Distant mets
What risk factors are different to bladder cancer
Balkan nephropathy
Lynch syndrome
Analgesic abuse - phenacetin
Treatment for Low risk UTUC
NB! Pt must be able to follow up
- Ureteroscopy + laser ablation
- percutaneous acess and resection
- ureteral resection
- Chemo ablation - Mitomycin containing thermal gel ( UGN 101)
Who gets adjuvant chemo for UTUC
LEVEL 1 evidence
POUT phase III prospective RCT
4 cycles of CG combo within 90 days post RNU vs AS
Disease free surveilance at 3 yrs 71 % vs 50%
5yrs 63% vs 46 %
MFS improvement = 19%
Indication = UTUC pT2-T4 N0M0 or any N1-2M0 , PS =0-1
Exclusion = GFR < 30 , Distant mets, unresectable, concurrent MIBC, PS >-2
What aboutt NAC for UTUC
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for High-risk Localized Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Final Long-term Outcomes from a Phase 2 Clinical Trial and an Expanded Cohort
Aug 2025 _ European journal of urology
Pathologygical response rate of 63% in patients with high risk Utuc was treatedted with GC 4 cycles prior to definitive surgery and had RNU within 12 weeks after NAC
DFS and OS rates was similar to POUT at 5 yrs
But becase 60-85% of patients may be ineligibleible for adjuvant GC or even carbo -itcan be strongly recommendedmended
Mitomycin Hydrogel = UGN 101
Reverse polymer hydrogel = thick at cold temperatures and gel at body temperature an dissolves in liquid
Thus developed as a sustained release mitomycin
Response rate of= 58 %
Side effects = Stricture rate 41 %
Stricture mitigation off label advice = Steroids and treatment holiday at first suggesition od any narrowing usually seen by 3rd or 4th Rx
Stenting
Give limited dose as adjuvant Rx after laser ablation
If giving all 6 doses for residual tumours = place a NT
Survival outcomes of KSS vs RNU in Low risk disease
CSS and OS at 5-10 yrs has no significant difference