How do we deal with low internal validity
Control extraneous/confounding variables
When does problems with internal validity occur
How could the problem that lowers internal validity be dealt with: ‘flawed behavioural categories, e.g. behaviour recorded inaccurately or behaviour wan’t recorded —> low validity’
How could the problem that lowers internal validity be dealt with: ‘presence of an observer causing social desirability bias’
How could the problem that lowers internal validity be dealt with: ‘observer bias, especially prevalent in participant observations where the observer might get too involved’
How could the problem that lowers internal validity be dealt with: ‘Difficulty in recording data, e.g. with non-participant observation where they might miss some behaviours, or participant observation where they can’t write it all down discretely so rely on memory later’
What are self reports
Refers to any data collection method that involves asking people to report on their own thoughts, feelings or beliefs to the researcher, e.g. questionnaire, interview, diary
What do you think th key problem could be in gathering accurate, valid data from self-reports
Social desirability bias
How would the issue be solved concerning self-reports: No appropriate option to choose as an answer, so participants can’t put what they feel
How would the issue be solved concerning self-reports: Some people don’t know what they think or feel
Give participants some options for possible answers
How would the issue be solved concerning self-reports: Giving socially acceptable answers rather than honest ones (social desirability bias)
How would the issue be solved concerning self-reports: leading Qs / ambiguous Qs
Change or remove problematic Qs
How would the issue be solved concerning self-reports: interviewer bias / effects
.
.