What are the two main approaches to valuation
Use these to get a potential range for a company’s value. Not exact.
1) Intrinsic:
- Look at biz ability to generate CFs
- DCF -> based on value = PV of its future free cash flows.
2) Relative:
- Look at comparable companies and apply the average/median of peers (EV/EBITDA, P/E)
- Look at trading and transaction comps
What are most common valuations used in finance
1) Trading Comps = base on how similar publicly-traded companies are valued.
2) Transaction Comps = Based on amount buyers paid to acquire a similar company
3) DCF: Value is a function of projected CFs, discounted at appropriate rates that reflect risk of those cash flows.
4) LBO: Look at potential acquisition target under highly leveraged scenario to determine max purchase price firm willing to pay.
5) Liquidation Analysis: Used for distressed companies. Value assets of company under worst-case, liqudiation scenario,
Public companies already have market caps and share prices. Why do you need to “value them” at all.
Market cap and share reflect current valuation per the market as a whole.
Market may be wrong
You value a company to see if the markets views are right and if the value might change based on your views
What are advantages & disadvantages of public comps valuation
Adv:
- Based on real market data
- Quick to find data and calcualte
- Do not depend on far in the future assumptions
Dis:
- No 2 companies are the same
- less accurate for volatile or thinly trade companies (stock is very violitile, small trades can change value)
What are advantages & disadvantages of transaction comps valuation
Adv:
- Based on real prices that companies have paid for other companies for.
- May better reflect industry trends than public comps.
Dis:
- Data can be spotty and misleading (especially private companies)
- May not be truly comparable transaction
- Specific deal terms/market conditions might distort multiples
What are advantages & disadvantages of DCF
Adv:
- Most “correct” per finance theory.
- Less subject to mkt fluctuations
- Better reflects company-specific factors and LT trends.
Dis:
- Sensitive to assumptions, less useful for fast-growing, unpredictable companies
- Very dependent on far-in-the-future assumptions.
When would it not make sense to use a DCF
DCF doesnt make sense when:
1) FCF not a meaningful metric (don’t have stable CFs)
- DCF assumes you can reasonable project revenue, maragins, CapEx etc.. if you cannot then valuation is not accurate.
2) Industry is asset-centric so you are better valuing A/L. Because their value doesn’t come from recurring FCF, and FCF is volatile.
Ex) Commercial banks, insurance firms, REIT
Almost always use public and transaction comps because universally applicable, but change metrics and multiples.
When to use a DCF
1) Stable and mature companies
2) Predictable growth rates
Which of the 3 main methodologies will produce highest implied values.
Transaction higher than public because of control premium (can be 25-50%) above market price.
What is control premium
Extra amount that buyers must pay to acquire sellers. Pay it cuz lets them make strategic changes, and capture synergies that minority stakeholders cannot.
Which should be worth more a $500MM EBITDA healthcare or industrials company. Assume same growth rates and margins
1) Healthcare since less asset-intensive
2) CapEx / Working Cap will be lower, CFs will be higher.
3) Healthcare tends to be more of a “growth industry”
4) DistRate might be higher for health, but lower asset insensitiy and higher expect growth could offset.
But would need more info.
How do you use a public/transaction comp in valuation
1) Select companies/transactions based on industry,size, geo, and time for transactions.
2) Determine and calculate appropriate metrics and multiples for each (rev, rev growth, EBITDA, EBITDA margins, etc)
3) Calc min, 25th, median, 75th, and max for each valuation multiple in set.
4) Apply these to company you analyst to estimate implied value.
When screening for similar public comps and transactions give an exp of what that might look like
Comparable: “U.S. based steel manufacturing companies over $500MM in rev)
Precedent: Aussie M&A transaction over past 2 years involving infra sellings with over $200MM in AUD in rev.
How do you choose which metrics and multis to use in valuation methods. Why do we do this.
Industry dependent, and what stage of growth the company is in. In general:
1) Revenue multiple (EV/Rev) -> how valuable a firm is relative to net sales
2) 1-2 Profitability multiples (P/E, EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT, EV/Unlev FCF) -> how valuable relative to profits.
Why do you look at both historical and projected metrics in these methods.
Historical:
- Based on what happened in real life.
-They can be deceptive if non-recurring items or company made acquisition or divestitures
Projected:
- Assume company will operate in a study state w/o acquisitions, divestitures, non-recc.
- But less reliable cuz based on predictions rather than historicals
When calculating forward multis for comparable companies, should you use current EQV or current EV, or project them to get Y1 and Y2 values.
ALWAYS use current EQV and EV, never project either.
A companys share price, and therefore both EQV and EV reflect past performance and future expectations.
Why do we use multiples instead of absolute values
We use multiples because you need to standardize various factors like size differences.
How do you interpret the public comps? What does it mean if the medians are above or below the ones of the company you are valuing.
Depends on growth rates and margins.
1) Most meaningful when growth rates and margins are similar
2) But multiples are different. But why? Could mean the company you are valuing is mispriced.
Ex:
- All companies growing at 10-15%, ebitda margins 10-15%. Your company has growth rates and margins in these ranges.
- But your company trades TEV/EBITDA multis of 6x to 8x, while comparable all trades at 10-12x
- could indicate company is undervalued since multi-lower, but growth rates, margins, industry, and size are comparable.
What is a liquidation valuation, how do you solve for it.
value of a company by estimating the market values of all assets.
1) add them up
2) sub Liab
3) gives you implied equity value (valuing net assets not net operating assets)
What is a liquidation valuation useful and no
useful:
- Distressed companies.
- Tells you have much they might be worth if they liquidate
- How much lender groups might recieve if liquidate
Not:
- Healthy, growing companies = undervalues them.
- Assets like Net PP&E are always worth more to distressed companies
Equity Value Multiples
P/E, Price/Book Value
Numerator: Market Cap or Price Per Share.
Denom: Metrics that already include interest exp (NI, BV of equity)
Enterprise Value Multiples
EV/EBITDA, EV/Revenue
Numerator: EV
Demom: Metrics that exclude interest expense (EBITDA, EBIT)
What is sum of the parts
value each division or business segment seperately using appropriate comps or DCF, then add all up.
When should you use sum of the parts