Main aim of his studies
Focused on how children play and socialise as well as their language development in the context of their understanding of the world
Main diversion from Piaget
Emphasising that children’s cognitive development cannot be fully understood without considering their social and cultural context
* knowledge is shared and acquired through imitation and collaborative learning
* unlike Piaget suggests that learning often leads to development rather than follows it
3 key aspects of Vygotsky’s theory into development
Zone of Proximal Development
The difference between what a child can achieve independently and what a child can achieve with guidance and encouragement from a more knowledgeable other
* the MKO will employ scaffolding to help the learner achieve the task
Scaffolding
To model, demonstrate or break down in steps how to solve a problem or task and then step back, offering support as needed
How does a child develop knowledge through a “more knowledgeable other”?
Vygotsky’s four major stages of speech development
Preintellectual Speech
Language as a social contact
* this includes crying, babbling, laughing and gesturing
Autonomous speech (12 months)
The child begins to invent words for objects in an effort to communicate with adults
Naïve psychology (begins at 18 to 24 months)
Child begins to use adult words
* begins to name things, connections develop between words and objects
* young child’s first expression is a simple word that conveys a greater meaning
* as the child’s thoughts become differentiated, he can formulate simple requests in the form of short and simple sentences
Communicative and egocentric speech (around 3 yrs old)
The child’s speech splits into two types of speech: communicative and egocentric
* Communicative speech is used to convey meaning to others (e.g. “I want milk”)
* Egocentric speech is self-talk, that guides a child through a task with no intention of communicating with someone else
Egocentric speech (more depth)
Strengths of Vygotsky’s theory (3)
Limitations of Vygotsky’s Theory (2)
Piaget vs Vygostky in sociocultural context
Piaget: little emphasis
Vygostky: strong emphasis
Piaget vs Vygostky in constructivism
Piaget: cognitive constructivism
Vygostky: social constructivism
Piaget vs Vygostky in stages
Piaget: strong emphasis of stages of development
Vygostky: no stages proposed
Piaget vs Vygostky in key processes in development and learning
Piaget: equilibration, schema, adaptation, assimilation, accomodation
Vygostky: zone of proximal development, scaffolding, language/dialogue, tools of the culture
Piaget vs Vygostky in role of language
Piaget: minimal (provides labels for experiences)
Vygostky: major (powerful role in shaping thought)
Two similarities between Piaget and Vygostky