WEEK 5 Flashcards

(38 cards)

1
Q

ATTITUDE CHANGE

A

Process through which out attitudes are modified
- Can be spontaneous (independent learning)
- Can be deliberate (persuasion from others)

People do not approach new information rationally or impartially

Existing attitudes will bias engagement with new information

Attempts to change attitudes can lead to attitude polarisation (attitudes become more extreme)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

SELECTIVE EXPOSURE

A

Attitudes influence exposure to new information

Consistency motives:
- Promote searching for attitude-consistent information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

SELECTIVE INTERPRETATION

A

Attitude influences interpretation of new information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

BIASED ASSIMILATION

A

Interpret new information in a way that aligns with existing attitudes

More readily accept attitude-consistent information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

ATTITUDE RESISTANCE STRATEGIES

A
  • Attitude bolstering
  • Counter arguing
  • Source derogation
  • Source validation
  • Assertions of confidence
  • Negative affect
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

ATTITUDE BOLSTERING

A

Generating thoughts that support existing attitude without directly refuting attitude-inconsistent information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

COUNTER-ARGUING

A

Generating rebuttals or counter-arguments to attitude inconsistent information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

SOURCE DEROGATION

A

Insulting the source, dismissing their credibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

SOURCE VALIDATION

A

Bringing to mind others who share existing attitude

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

ASSERTIONS OF CONFIDENCE

A

Claiming that nothing and no one will ever be able to change our mind

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

NEGATIVE AFFECT

A

Getting angry, irritated and upset

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

WHY DO WE RESIST PERSUASION?

A
  • moralisation
  • difficulty
  • psychological reactance
  • reluctance to change
  • concerns of deception
  • desire for cognitive consistency
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

MORALISATION

A

Makes attitudes not just a matter of opinion, but a moral issue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

DIFFICULTY

A

Difficulty associated with change, making it easier to reject new information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

PSYCHOLOGICAL REACTANCE

A

if persuasion attempt is perceived to threaten one’s sense of autonomy, freedom, or independence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

RELUCTANCE TO CHANGE

A

It involves uncertainty and lack of control

17
Q

CONCERNS OF DECEPTION

A

Especially for those who think their existing beliefs are already correct, accurate, true.

18
Q

DESIRE FOR COGNITIVE CONSISTENCY

A

Can lead to rejection of dissonance-arousing information

19
Q

FACTORS INFLUENCING ATTITUDE CHANGE

A
  • Message quality
  • Source credibility
  • Source vested interest
  • Source attractiveness
  • Source likability
  • Source group membership
20
Q

MESSAGE QUALITY

A

Stronger arguments -> greater attitude change

21
Q

SOURCE CREDIBILITY

A

More credible source -> greater attitude change

Perceived to have greater expertise and trustworthiness

Credible sources aren’t always correct

May have vested interests

SOMETIMES sources low in credibility elicit attitude change

22
Q

SOURCE VESTED INTEREST

A

Individuals stake in the issue

Lower attributions of vested interest -> greater attitude change

23
Q

SOURCE ATTRACTIVENESS

A

More attractive source -> greater attitude change

24
Q

SOURCE LIKABILITY

A

More likeable source -> greater attitude change

25
SOURCE SIMILARITY
More similar source -> greater attitude change
26
SOURCE GROUP MEMBERSHIP
Ingroup source -> greater attitude change
27
SOCIAL CONSENSUS
The attitude the majority of people hold towards a particular attitude object Greater social consensus -> greater attitude change Not everyone will be influenced by consensus information
28
FALSE CONSENUS EFFECT
People automatically infer that the majority of others already think as they do
29
MESSAGE FRAMING
Match between framing of message and attitudes/values of recipient -> greater attitude change Most persuasive appeals are those tailored to recipient
30
MORAL REFRAMING
A technique in which a position an individual would not normally support is framed in a way that is consistent with that individuals moral values Makes it familiar, relevant, easier to integrate Transforms morally 'wrong' attitude to morally 'right' through framing
31
COGNITIVE DISSONANCE
Psychological state aroused when one perceives they hold conflicting attitudes or behaviour Experiencing cognitive dissonance can result in attitude/behavioural change
32
PERSUASIVE POWER OF AI
Conversations with AI can be more effective than changing people's attitudes than humans Due to patience, responsiveness, personalisation and lower perceived bias
33
PREVENTING ATTITUDE CHANGE?
Can be dangerous Contributes to attitude polarisation - Illusory truth effect - Deliberation - Debunking - Forewarning - Psychological inoculation
34
ILLUSORY TRUTH EFFECT
Tendency to believe that repeated information tends to be correct
35
DELIBERATION
Allows people to pick up on misinformation by processing it carefully
36
DEBUNKING
Fact-checking and correction
37
FOREWARNING
Warning a person in advance that they will be the target of a persuasive attempt
38
PSYCHOLOGICAL INOCULATION
Exposing a person to persuasive argument + counter arguments to that persuasive argument to build their resistance to real persuasive event. 1. forewarn person of expected persuasive attempt 2. present expected arguments person with use to individual 3. provide the individual with counter-arguments