What else could you have controlled for?
What made you state hypothesis 1 about PCs of public funds having unclear exit strategies?
What made you state hypothesis 2 about PCs of private funds pursuing IPOs more often?
What made you state hypothesis 3 about PCs of public funds having a lower intensity of exit-directed activities?
What made you state hypothesis 4 about no significant difference between PCs focus on internationalization?
What made you state hypothesis 5 about VCs perceived contribution towards internationalization to be higher among PCs of non-public funds?
Why are you not showing the 2 other forms of secondary sale as answer options?
The two other forms being VC fund selling share to other VC-fund OR to a financial institution.
These are uncommon and IF people had that planned, it could be written in “others”.
Also, we took the question from Isaksson’s survey.
Why the chosen methodology?
Why early- and late-stage together?
Lockett et al. (2008) found that the later the stage of development, the less VC-funds contribute to the internationalization process due to internally developed resources.
We thus chose to separate SEED-stage from other stages as these are the earliest.
But stage is not significant for any of the final models - in fact, it is not even included in MODEL 3A and 3C.
What else could you have used instead of the Pearson’s chi-squared test?
When having expected counts below 5, Fisher’s exact test is an alternative (for 2x2 at least)
But using Chi-square as simply and then also comparable to Isaksson.
What would be the alternative to the use of a principal component factor analysis?
Three types of factor analysis:
What was the process of your backward selection of independent variables in your final regression model?
What can explain PCs of public funds higher focus on internationalization? How could this be investigated further?
What is Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin’s (KMO) Measure of Sampling Adequacy?
Measures/tests whether a correlation matrix is adequate for factor analysis.
“a statistic that indicates the proportion of variance in your variables that might be caused by underlying factors”
As long as the KMO value is minimum 0.6, you are good
What is the K1 approach?
Strictly dropping factors with eigenvalues below 1 (Kaiser 1960) => for Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin
What is Bartlett’s Test of Sphericit?
“tests the hypothesis that your correlation matrix is an identity matrix, which would indicate that your variables are unrelated and therefore unsuitable for structure detection.” = and thus unsuitable for factor analysis.
As long as you can reject this null hypothesis, you are good.
What is Principal Component Factor Analysis?
“a method to create one or more index variables from a larger set of measured variables”
What is an Eigenvalue?
The values reported from the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin test. Must be above 1 when using the K1 approach in determining number of factors.
What is a Scree plot?
Simply a plot of the eigenvalues.
Interpreting the scree plot = you should not include factors from the point where it stops dropping substantially / when it flattens out
What is the Unrotated solution?
The variables will load on both axes making it impossible to see the patterns.
What is Rotated factor analysis?
In rotated solutions, the reference axes has been changed, thereby making the patterns of loading more obvious.
What is an Orthogonal rotation?
Rotations produce factors that are uncorrelated = maintain a 90 degree angle.
the alternative are “oblique methods” of rotation in which the factors are allowed to correlate = the axes are allowed to assume a different angle than 90 degrees.
What is Composite factors?
Composite = sammensatte
Think this is not a term, just use of a fancy word we didn’t know the meaning of.
What is Cronbach’s alpha coefficient?
A measure of internal consistency = how closely related a set of items are as a group.
Considered to be a measure of reliability (or consistency).
Fx used to test whether Likert-scale surveys are reliable.