Article 5
Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. No one shall be deprived of this right except for in the situations in 5(1) (a-f) and in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law
Article 5(1) (a-c)
The situations when a state can lawfully deprive a person of their liberty
The distinction between deprivation and restriction of liberty
There is a distinction between a deprivation of and a restriction of liberty, depending on factors such as degree and intensity (Guzzardi v Italy, type (Austin v UK) and length (Kasparov v Russia)
HM v Switzerland
Article 5 can only be engaged when there is a deprivation of liberty, not a mere restriction
Austin v UK
Kettling can be either a restriction or deprivation. Decided by whether the containment was 1. unavoidable 2. necessary 3. kept to the minimum
Depriving liberty can be lawful if one of these exceptions apply…
5(1)(a) - person has been convicted to a sentence by the court
5(1)(b) - to secure compliance with a lawful obligation
5(1)(c) - on reasonable suspicion of having committed an offence or to prevent an offence
Ostendorf v Germany
Any obligation must be specific and concrete, rather than a general duty to obey police instructions
5(1)(b)
Kasparov v Russia
There was an unlawful deprivation as there was no evidence or any reasonable grounds for suspicion
5(1)(c)
5.2
Informed promptly, in language they understand, the reason for detention
5.3
Only applies to (1)(c): Brought promptly before a judge to decide whether to remain in custody or be released on bail
R(Hicks) v Commissioner of PM
Preventative detention can only be lawful provided the arrest was lawful
5.4
Lawfulness of detention decided speedily by court
5.5
Anyone arrested/detained in contradiction with these provisions entitled to compensation
UK domestic legislation complying with Article 5
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act (PACE) 1984
s.24(1) PACE
Police officers can arrest a suspect without a warrant where a person is committing, is about to or has committed a criminal offence
s.24(5) PACE
Reasonable grounds that make arrest necessary:
- Identify suspect
- Prevent injury/damage
- Allow effective investigation
- Prevent suspect from dissapearing
What is the 2-stage test to prevent necessity?
PACE
Hayes:
1. Did the officer actually believe the arrest was necessary? (subjective)
2. Was that belief objectively reasonably
s.28
An arrested person has the right to be told the reason for their arrest ASAP
During an anticipated breach of the peace, when should the power of arrest be used?
Only when there is a sufficiently serious and imminent threat
Hicks
Breach of peace
Detention for preventative reasons is not an unlawful deprivation of liberty
Define breach of peace
The behaviour of the person involved causing the police officer to believe that a breach of peace had or would occur and that it related to harm which was done or likely to be done to a person OR a person is in fear of being harmed - R v Howell