What were the three attachment types ?
Describe the insecure avoidant attchment
Describe the secure attachment
Describe the insecure resistant attachmet
Who conducted the cultural variations in attachment ?
Describe van Ijzendoorn cultural variations study
What were van Ijzendoorn Findings ?
secure ( most common) in all countries
avoidant ( more common in individualistic cultures) , resistant in non Western
insecure resistant , leastcommon
more variaion within countries than between countries.
Which country had the most insecure avoidant ?
Germany at 35%
Holland 26%
Which country had the most insecure resistant ?
Japan at 27%
Israel 29%
Which country had the least secure infants ?
China at 50 %
Geramny 57%
UK attachment finding ?
avoidant - 22%
secure 75% (had the most secure)
resistant 3%
van Ijzendoorn conclusions ?
secure was the most common in all countries (so biological basis > innate )
however there could be other explanations eg parenting styles
-german>encourage independence>avoidant
- japanese>spend time with infants>resistant attachment.
A03 van Ijzendoorn (cultural variation)
may lack temporal validity
- due to chnaging modern world
+ evidence for bowlby
- secure was dominnt so there is a bio drive
imposed etic
-culturally bound
+ meta analysis
- large sample
-any mistakes hv small efect on overal results , increases validity
ethnocentrism
- cultural bias as secure attachment is viwed as superior whilst others labelled insecure ( taking local norm and impoing to wider world )
What is imposed etic ?
attempting to genralise results for a certai culture to another
How many of the 32 studies were conducted in the US ?
15
What were the aims of the Ijzendoorn study ?
what other research ?
grossman and grosmman
- german parenting style.
What is attachment ?
-Infants and caregivers dvelop deep and lasting emotional bonds
-both seek closeness and feel secured when close to their attachment figure
What are the two types of caregiver interactions ?
reiprocity - turn taking , both care-giver and infant respond to each others cues
interactional synchrony - simultaneous interaction , appear to be acting rythmically with matching co-ordinated behaviour .
caregiver infant interactions ao3
+ support from melzoff and moore
infant responses matched experimenters facial expressions , meaning abiliy to reciprocate through imitation is present from an early age
+ high control , recordings , interater reliability so high internal validity
Stages of attachment ?
1) asocial - ( 0-6 weeks )
- innate behaviours crying /smiling
- also display these to non-human objects
- anyone can comfort them , do not prefer any individual care giver
2) indiscriminate attachment 6w -7m
- can differentiate between humans and objects
- no stanger/separation anxiety yet
- smile at familiar indivduals
3) specific attachment (7-9 months)
- form strong attachmen to primary care giver
- separation and stranger anxiety develop .
4) multiple attachment 9-10 months
- form attachment with regular caregivers eg grandpa , brothers
- separtion/stranger anxiety decrease
Stages of attachment ?
asocial - ( 0-6 weeks )
indiscriminate attachment 6w -7m
specific attachment (7-9 months)
multiple attachment 9-10 months
Stages of attachment by schaffer evaluation :
+ support for stages
60 working class babies in glasgow
stranger and separtion anxiety asessed
SepA mostly in 25-32 wks with StrA occuring 1 month later
suggests development occurs in stages
+ observed in their own homes so had high mundane realism so behaviour recorded was valid
what is the role of the father ?
1) active play
- emphasise stimulation
- encourage risk taking behaviours
2) primary caregiver
- mothers now work
- however if fathers become primary care givers their interactinal style changes to become more sensitive etc