Attachment Flashcards

(42 cards)

1
Q

What were the three attachment types ?

A
  • secure attachment ( B )
  • insecure avoidant ( A )
  • secure resistant ( C )
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Describe the insecure avoidant attchment

A
  • infants keep distance from their mother and explore freely
  • display low stranger anxiety
  • low separation anxiety
  • don’t attempt to get comfort when mom returns
  • moms show little responsiveness to their infants .
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Describe the secure attachment

A
  • use mother as a safe base
  • as they explore environment
  • moderate stranger anxiety
    -show separation anxiety
    -happy reunion
    -moms show sensitive responsiveness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Describe the insecure resistant attachmet

A
  • do not explore environment as they are clingy
    -higher stranger and separation anxiety
    -reject comfort when mom returns
  • mother inconsistant with sensitive responsiveness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Who conducted the cultural variations in attachment ?

A
  • van Ijzendoorn (1998)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Describe van Ijzendoorn cultural variations study

A
  • large scale meta aalysis
  • 2000 infants
    -32 studies
  • 8 countries
  • used the strange situation to classify attachment types.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What were van Ijzendoorn Findings ?

A

secure ( most common) in all countries

avoidant ( more common in individualistic cultures) , resistant in non Western

insecure resistant , leastcommon

more variaion within countries than between countries.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Which country had the most insecure avoidant ?

A

Germany at 35%
Holland 26%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Which country had the most insecure resistant ?

A

Japan at 27%
Israel 29%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Which country had the least secure infants ?

A

China at 50 %
Geramny 57%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

UK attachment finding ?

A

avoidant - 22%
secure 75% (had the most secure)
resistant 3%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

van Ijzendoorn conclusions ?

A

secure was the most common in all countries (so biological basis > innate )

however there could be other explanations eg parenting styles
-german>encourage independence>avoidant

 - japanese>spend time with infants>resistant attachment.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

A03 van Ijzendoorn (cultural variation)

A

may lack temporal validity
- due to chnaging modern world

+ evidence for bowlby
- secure was dominnt so there is a bio drive

imposed etic
-culturally bound

+ meta analysis
- large sample
-any mistakes hv small efect on overal results , increases validity

ethnocentrism
- cultural bias as secure attachment is viwed as superior whilst others labelled insecure ( taking local norm and impoing to wider world )

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is imposed etic ?

A

attempting to genralise results for a certai culture to another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How many of the 32 studies were conducted in the US ?

A

15

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What were the aims of the Ijzendoorn study ?

A
  • asses whether there was a pattern in distribution of attachment types
  • assess inter and intra differences in samples
  • asses simi + diff in the amt of type A,B,C attachment tyes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

what other research ?

A

grossman and grosmman
- german parenting style.

18
Q

What is attachment ?

A

-Infants and caregivers dvelop deep and lasting emotional bonds
-both seek closeness and feel secured when close to their attachment figure

19
Q

What are the two types of caregiver interactions ?

A

reiprocity - turn taking , both care-giver and infant respond to each others cues

interactional synchrony - simultaneous interaction , appear to be acting rythmically with matching co-ordinated behaviour .

20
Q

caregiver infant interactions ao3

A

+ support from melzoff and moore
infant responses matched experimenters facial expressions , meaning abiliy to reciprocate through imitation is present from an early age

+ high control , recordings , interater reliability so high internal validity

  • depend on inferences as infants cannot communicate their thoughts and feelings
20
Q

Stages of attachment ?

A

1) asocial - ( 0-6 weeks )
- innate behaviours crying /smiling
- also display these to non-human objects
- anyone can comfort them , do not prefer any individual care giver

2) indiscriminate attachment 6w -7m
- can differentiate between humans and objects
- no stanger/separation anxiety yet
- smile at familiar indivduals

3) specific attachment (7-9 months)
- form strong attachmen to primary care giver
- separation and stranger anxiety develop .

4) multiple attachment 9-10 months
- form attachment with regular caregivers eg grandpa , brothers
- separtion/stranger anxiety decrease

21
Q

Stages of attachment ?

A

asocial - ( 0-6 weeks )
indiscriminate attachment 6w -7m
specific attachment (7-9 months)
multiple attachment 9-10 months

22
Q

Stages of attachment by schaffer evaluation :

A

+ support for stages
60 working class babies in glasgow
stranger and separtion anxiety asessed
SepA mostly in 25-32 wks with StrA occuring 1 month later
suggests development occurs in stages

  • cant generalise
    glasgow
    working class
    lack temporal validity (outdated social norm / not reflective of modern attachment types)

+ observed in their own homes so had high mundane realism so behaviour recorded was valid

23
Q

what is the role of the father ?

A

1) active play
- emphasise stimulation
- encourage risk taking behaviours

2) primary caregiver
- mothers now work
- however if fathers become primary care givers their interactinal style changes to become more sensitive etc

24
Role of the father evaluation :
+ field - supportive research fathers - game playing mothers - sensitive responsive behaviour - socially sensitive - gay couples / single dads may feel they cant fully support their children
25
Describe Lorenz's imprinting study (5)
randomly divided a clutch of goose eggs * half-hatched in an incubator and the first ‘thing’ they saw was Lorenz * half-hatched with their mother * once hatched the two groups were mixed up and Lorenz observed who/what they followed * he varied the time between birth and seeing a moving object so he could measure the critical period for imprinting
26
Describe Harlow's monkey study (5)
in a controlled environment, infant monkeys reared with two mother surrogates * plain wire mother dispensing food, cloth-covered mother with no food * time spent with each mother was recorded * details of fear conditions * long-term effects recorded: sociability, relationship to offspring, etc
27
Animal studies ao3
- generalising animal behaviour to humans ( we r complex beings due to social n cutural experiences etc) - extrapolation + supported by bowlby that infants require comfort to form a monotropic relationship , if this fails then they grow to be adults with poor socialiation - unethical to monkeys , distress to monkeys however did lead to understanding of attachment
28
Explanations of Attachment : Cupboard Love Theory
1) cupboard love theory - learning due to association (classical conditioning) - food = US , Mother = NS then CS - infant now experiences pleasure as a response in mother's presence OR operant conditioning -+ ve reinforcement by giving milk when the baby cries so baby most likely to repeat crying behaviour -ve bcz mom re moves unpleasant stimulus of crying AO3 + face validity , makes sense that babies cry when they need food + backed by Pavlov and skinner -however impossible to carry out on actual babies due to ethical reasons - environmentally reductionist (reduces it to stimulus associations) - contrary to Harlow's monkeys who preferred comfort over food - alternative theory , monotropic , biological and evolutionary
29
Explanations of Attachment : Bowlby's monotropic
- evolutionary explanation - Bowlby argues it is instinctual as forming a strong attachment is vital to infants survival as their mother provides food and security - babies use social releasers in order to form these which include , crying , smiling - mothers are biologically programmed to find these cute / alarming - critical period (first 30months) , inability to do so , permanent -ve social, intellectual and emotional consequences in infant - this bond acts as a schema / blueprint for future relationships in adulthood - bond is disrupted by distance / separation for long periods AO3 + Bowlby's work base on Lorenz - however there is sense of extrapolation , also this period is sensitive in humans not critical as suitable care can recover damage + applications eg need for physical contact after birth , investigate infant neglect and inspire Mary Ainsworth - lacks temporal validity as seeing the mother as a the primary caregiver is more of a 1940s view - modern parents share care giving - alternative explanations
30
What behaviours show attachment strength
- proximity to mother - exploration (safe base behaviour) - reunion response - sensitive responsiveness of mother
31
Ainsworth Strange Situation (overall)
- mother and baby enter room with toys - stranger enters ( observe stranger anxiety) - mother leaves room ( observe stranger anxiety ) - mother returns (observe reaction) - mother leaves again and left alone - stranger enters -mother returns
32
What are the consequences of deprivation ?
Deliquency - behaviour outside the norm eg petty crime Affectionless Psychopathy - due to disrupted emotional development Low IQ - due to disrupted intellectual development
33
Bowlby's Theory of Maternal Deprivation AO3 :
+ 44 thieves 14 thieves matched criteria for affectionless psychopathy , compared to none in the control grp , 12had experienced prolonged separation compared to two of the control . Suggests a link btwn maternal deprivation and deliquency - researh is corelational so maybe third factors eg extreme poverty / criminal relatives who r role models - monotropy underestimates role of father in early attachment - findings of orphan studies suggest children hv sensiive period not critical which can be reversed
34
Define insttutionalisation :
nstitutionalisation refers to when a person becomes accustomed to the norms and routines of an institution (such as a care home or orphanage) and struggles to adapt to life outside that environment.
35
Define Deprivation ?
not recieving suitable emotional care from a primay attachment figure this can happen with freq / extended absences of the primary caregiver.
36
Define privation ?
- total lack of care so no ability to form an attachment bond - more severe
37
What did the romanian orphans face in 1990 ?
- Institutional Privation
38
Describe Romanian orphan studies - ( rutters research)
- romanian children grouped into those adopted while under 6months btwn 6months and two years . A control grp of British adoptees - each group assessed at the ages of 4 , 6 , 11 , 15 FINDINGS - adopted at 6months and after 2 showed disinhibited attachment - after 6 showed delayed physical/emotional/intellectual development - - adopted after 6 had low iq of 77 compared to below 6months of 102 - quasi autism in some cases CONCLUSION - adoption within the first 6months is importants as the rate of recovery depends on age adoption -effects of privation cn be severe and long lasting - sensitive not critical period
39
Romanian orphan studies - (Rutters research) - AO3
+ practical applications , changed policis around adoption - children were selected so maybe those more sociable were picked for adoption at a younger age + support for sensitive period , Tizard and Hodges , children adopted into caring fmilies coped more than in terms of bhavioural and peer relationships than children returned to their org abusive families , studies suggest adverse effect of instututionalisation cn be overcome with right care
40
Influence of early attachment on childhood attachment on childhood and adult relationships :
- Internal Working model - infants develop schema , based on attachment to primary caregiver ,schema acts as templat for new relatoionships - Continuity Hypothesis - future relationships will follow pattern based on their IWM - Bowlby suggests children with a disrupted attachment with their primary caregiver in the critical period will have problems with development
41
Influence of early attachment on childhood attachment on childhood and adult relationships : AO3
+ support , Love Quiz on the newspaper ( find stats) + McCathy - found adults with long lasting secure frienships were securely attached in childhood suggests ... + prac applications , schools can address bullying + lonliness , potentially reducing costs to economy related to divorce + mental health linked to poor relatoships - correlational , no caue n effect , third part influence - early infant relationships may not be recalled accurately due to demand characteristics / social desirability -