what was the procedure of Rutter and Sonuga - Barke (2010)
ERA
led a study on Romanian orphans since early 1990s called ERA, this study included orphans who spent time in an institution and therefore suffered from the effects of institutionalisation
of the group 111 were adopted before the age of 2 and 54 before the age of 4
the adopetes were tested at the ages of 4,6,11,15 to assess their physical cognitive and social development they also got information form teachers and parents
this information was compared with 52 children adopted in UK before the age of 6 months
What was the findings of Rutter and Sonuga-Barke (2010)
at the time of adoption the Romanian orphans lagged behind in everything - they were smaller,weighed less and some were categorised as mentally retarded
by the age of 4 some had caught up to the british adoptees but this mainly happened if they were adopted before the age of 6 months
beyond the age of 6 months significant deficits remained - they had disinhibited attachment, peer relationship problems
this showed that the long term consequences were less serve if the children had a chance to form an attachment (adopted before 6 months) but were more serve if they did not form an attachment
What were the other studies of Romanian orphans
What are the effects of institutionalism?
evaluation of Romanian orphans : individual differences
some studys say that individulas who do not form a primary attachment within a sensitive period are unable to recover
evaluation of Romanian orphans : Real-life application
improved how children were cared for in hospitals
evaluation of Romanian orphans : value of longitudinal study
evaluation of Romanian orphan studies : deprivation is only one factor
Evaluation of Romanian orphan studies: institutionalisation may cause slow development
What was Ainsworth interested in
Ainsworth was more interested with the different types of attachment that infants form with their care givers these types of style were seen as patterns of thinking and feeling
What was the aim of strange situation
the aim was to see how infants behaved under conditions of mild stress and novelty
What are the different types of attachment
secure attachment (type B) insecure resistant (type C), insecure resistant(Type A)
Describe what happens in strange situation
What were the findings of strange situations
combined data from 106 different studies using middle class families, they noted the similarities and differences and found different attachment types
describe secure attachment (Type B)
Describe insecure - avoidant (Type A)
Describe insecure-resistant (Type C)
What percentage of infects are
A, secure attached
B, insecure-avoidant
C, insecure-resistant
A 66%
B 22%
C 12%
Evaluation of Ainsworth Strange Situation: other types of attachment
Ainsworth overlooked a 4th attachment type,
Main and Soloman (1986) - analysed over 200 strange situation video tapes and proposed insecure-disorganised (Type D) this is a lack of consistent patterns of social behaviour
- they lack a convenient strategy for dealing with the stress pf separation for example they show strong attachment behaviours followed by avoidance of caregiver - Van Ijzendoorm supported this
Evaluation of Ainsworth Strange Situation: High reliability
measurement’s confirmed if agreeable if agreement among obsevers called interobserver reliability determined by comparing ratings 94% agreement therefore it was highly reliable
Evaluation of Ainsworth Strange Situation: Can types of attachment be applied to real life
in situations where disordered attachments happen interventions are put into place,
- security project taught better care to mothers and saw a 60-15% decrease in caregivers categorised as disordered
Evaluation of Ainsworth Strange Situation: Does it have low internal validity
Main and Weston - behave differently depending on what parent they are with therefore it was not measuring the aim as only one relationship measured but Bowlby’s theory of monotropy suggested than infant behaved differently with anyone other than the caregiver. Main (1999) supported him, tested children and re-assessed them at the age of 9 using the AAI interview they found that the attachment was influenced by the mother
Evaluation of Ainsworth Strange Situation: maternal reflective functioning
this suggested that secure attachment was linked to maternal sensitivity
What did Van Ijzenfoorm and Kroonenburg do? (cultural variations of attachment)
Conducted a meta-anaylsis of the findings from 32 studies of attachment behaviour they examined over 2,000 strange situations classifications in 8 different countries