Creative thinking, imagination, and how:
Idea stacking:
- Absorb relentlessly.
- Read, watch, reflect, listen. Fill your brain with diverse knowledge. The more raw material you have, the easier it is to connect dots, although a crucial component is still missing if you only do this.
- But before you start absorbing with diverse ideas, you need to start creating, even if it’s something basic, because there is literally no point if you don’t create and just absorb mindlessly.
- Write down interesting, important, aesthetic, and aligned ideas. It doesn’t matter if they seem unrelated. A marketing concept, a science fact, a personal insight, log everything.
- Find unexpected connections. Ask yourelf how you can mix things. Apply ideas to problems. You don’t need to wait for inspiration, just keep stacking ideas.
It is of pramount importance that we don’t overly rely on AI.
- Working memory
- Creativity and imagination
- Working memory:
Juggling, playing a musical instrument
- Creativity and imagination:
Writing, thinking, talking, reading, listening
- Sports - Team sports, combat sports, sports that involve aim
- Dance/complex movement
- Physical exercise
- Action computer games
- Music
- Language learning
- Meditation
- Social interaction
- Rapping
- Reading aloud
- Juggling
- Programming
- Art
- Reading
- Writing
- Speaking
- Listening
- Speaking
Increasing intelligence starts with a theory by guy named Ilya Prigogine who received the Nobel prize in 1977 for it.
The theory: anything that’s alive takes in energy and releases it. But if you overload it, one of two things can happen: it can die, or jump to a whole new level—transforming into something far more sophisticated, able to handle all that energy.
What happens is you keep doing this series of aha’s, aha’s, so that the brain is perturbed and its neurons vibrate.
If you want to be innovative, you gotta be willing to be uncomfortable, uneasy. You gotta overload and stay in that perturbed state so that your mind has no choice but to become more sophisticated, able to handle increasingly levels of energy and complexity. You will be brighter, faster, focused, attentive, and creative.
memory involved in creativity, deep understanding, imagination, and fluid intelligence?
Multiple memory systems contribute to creativity, deep understanding, imagination, and fluid intelligence, though each cognitive function relies on specific memory types to different extents.
Creativity and imagination
Creativity and imagination involve combining and reorganizing information from both long-term and working memory.
Semantic memory: Your memory for general knowledge and facts is a crucial reservoir of information for creative thought. Highly creative individuals may have “flatter” associative networks in their semantic memory, which allows for broader, less conventional connections between remote concepts. Creative problem-solving often depends on the ability to bypass common, strongly associated ideas to arrive at more original solutions.
Episodic memory: This is your memory for specific personal events. The “constructive episodic simulation hypothesis” proposes that the episodic memory system is used to flexibly combine details from past experiences to simulate future events or create novel imaginary scenarios. Neuroimaging studies show that similar brain regions are active during both episodic recall and imagination tasks.
Working memory: This system holds and manipulates information for short periods. For creativity, working memory plays a vital role in managing the retrieved information, controlling attention, and strategically searching for relevant connections in long-term memory. For some creative tasks, like convergent thinking (finding a single, correct solution), working memory capacity is a strong predictor of performance.
Deep understanding
Deep understanding relies heavily on the consolidation of information into long-term memory, which forms the organized knowledge structures needed to comprehend complex concepts and draw connections.
Semantic memory: Deep understanding is built upon a vast and organized network of factual knowledge and conceptual relationships stored in semantic memory. Each time you access and use information, you strengthen the neural pathways associated with it, which makes future retrieval more efficient.
Schemas: Long-term memory stores knowledge in organized structures called schemas. These mental frameworks help interpret and encode new information by providing context based on what you already know. Having the right schema is essential for deeper learning and comprehension.
Fluid intelligence
Fluid intelligence is the ability to reason, solve new problems, and think abstractly, independent of acquired knowledge. It is strongly linked to working memory.
Working memory: There is a robust and significant correlation between working memory capacity (WMC) and fluid intelligence (Gf). Working memory provides the “workspace” for mentally holding and manipulating information, which is critical for complex reasoning tasks.
Processing speed: The speed at which you can retrieve and process information from long-term memory affects how effectively your working memory can operate.
Inhibition: The ability to ignore or suppress irrelevant information also supports both strong working memory and fluid intelligence by allowing focus on the problem at hand.
Other factors: While working memory is strongly predictive of fluid intelligence, research indicates they are not isomorphic (identical). Other cognitive processes, such as long-term memory retrieval and attention control, also play a role.
Notes:
Creative individuals tend to have semantic memory structured with “flatter” associative hierarchies, meaning they have more numerous, weakly related associations to a given concept. This allows for a broader spread of activation through memory networks, making it easier to connect remote or unrelated concepts to generate novel ideas
Mental hierarchies:
- Not immediate or stereotypical, but remote and seemingly unassociated.
It seems as if wider access to long term
Long-term memory is best understood as a complex web or network structure, rather than a single, rigid hierarchy. While hierarchical organization is one element of how memory works, contemporary cognitive science uses a more flexible model, known as a semantic network, to explain the complexity of memory organization and retrieval
Key features of network-based organization:
Interconnected nodes: Concepts are represented as “nodes” in a web, with “links” representing the associations between them. For example, the “dog” node might be linked to “animal,” “pet,” and “bark”.
Variable link strength: The length and strength of the links can vary based on personal experience. The more frequently two concepts are associated, the stronger and shorter the link between them. This explains why thinking of “peanut butter” may quickly bring to mind “jelly” for many people.
Spreading activation: When a node is activated (e.g., by hearing the word “fire truck”), the activation spreads to related nodes (e.g., “red,” “siren,” “engine”), making those related concepts more easily retrievable. The strength of the connection determines how far and fast this activation spreads
For example, a person might recognize that “a robin is a bird” faster than “a robin is an animal,” even though “animal” is higher up the strict hierarchy. This is because the concepts are linked by associations formed through experience, which the semantic network model accounts for by allowing for links of varying strengths and types
Semantic networks
A semantic network is a graph-based knowledge representation scheme where nodes represent concepts or objects, and directed links represent the relationships between them. This structure, which can be hierarchical or based on individual experience, organizes information for both human understanding and machine processing, especially in fields like Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Natural Language Processing (NLP), expert systems, and information retrieval.
Characteristics stored at nodes, with the principle of cognitive economy suggesting properties are stored at the most general relevant node to avoid redundancy
How They Work
Concept Organization: Concepts are organized in a structured way, forming interconnected ideas rather than isolated facts.
Hierarchical Structure (Early Models): Early models used a hierarchy, organizing concepts from general categories to specific examples.
Spreading Activation: The human mind can “activate” concepts by moving through the network from one connected idea to another.
Modified Models: More recent models acknowledge that semantic networks can be shaped by individual experiences and knowledge, allowing for varying link lengths and direct links.
Benefits
Simplicity and Clarity:
Semantic networks are easy to understand and visualize.
Human and Machine Readability:
They provide a way to structure related data that is clear to both people and computers.
Knowledge Organization:
They effectively organize complex information, highlighting the interconnections between different ideas.
How to build perfect mind maps
Use GRINDE
1. Grouping
2. Relational
3.
- Relational: thinking about how ideas are related to each other and expressing that in the mind map.
There are 3 levels of relationships we can form while mandmapping:
Level 1: Few relationships
Level 2: Too many relationships
Level 3: Organized relationships
A relationship can be anyway that two facts or concepts relate to each other.
Artificial Neural Networks and its Applications - GeeksforGeeks
Neural network models, or Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), are computational models inspired by the brain’s structure, consisting of interconnected layers of “neurons” (nodes) that learn from data to perform tasks like pattern recognition and prediction. Key types include Feedforward Neural Networks for simple predictions, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) excelling in image processing, and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) for sequential data like text or time series, with more advanced models like Transformers also existing.
How Neural Networks Work
Layers: A neural network has an input layer that receives data, one or more hidden layers that perform complex calculations and pattern recognition, and an output layer that provides the final prediction or classification.
Neurons and Connections: Each layer consists of nodes, or “neurons,” which are connected to nodes in the next layer via “synapses”. These connections have associated weights that determine their strength and influence.
Learning Process:
Forward Pass: Input data is fed through the network, with each neuron processing the information and passing it on to the next layer.
Weight Adjustment: During training, the network compares its output to the known correct outcomes and uses this difference (error) to update the connection weights. This process, called backpropagation, helps the network learn to make accurate predictions.
Activation Functions: Nonlinear activation functions are used in neurons to introduce complexity, enabling the network to learn intricate, non-linear patterns in data beyond simple linear correlations.
Common Types of Neural Network Models
Feedforward Neural Networks (FNNs) / Perceptrons: Information flows in only one direction, from input to output, with no loops. Multilayer Perceptrons (MLPs) are a common type.
Convolutional Neural Networks
(CNNs): Specialized for tasks like image and video recognition, using convolutional layers to detect spatial hierarchies of patterns.
Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs): Designed for sequential data, such as natural language or time series, with internal memory that allows them to process information over time.
Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM)
Networks: A type of RNN that is particularly good at learning long-term dependencies in sequential data.
Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs): Two neural networks (a generator and a discriminator) compete to generate new, realistic data.
Transformer Networks: A more advanced architecture, particularly effective for natural language processing, that can handle long-range dependencies and parallelize computations
Here is a breakdown of how different network concepts, including semantic and small-world, are relevant to understanding and potentially influencing consciousness, intelligence, and reality.
Small-world networks
The human brain is organized as a small-world network, a topology that efficiently balances information segregation and integration.
Structure: Small-world networks have a high degree of local clustering (like specialized brain regions) and a short path length between any two nodes (sparse, long-range connections).
Function: This efficient structure supports both specialized, localized functions (segregation) and broad, insightful thinking that connects different areas (integration).
Elevating consciousness: Some researchers propose that true insight and wisdom emerge when these clusters of specialized knowledge are well-integrated. Therefore, practices that encourage the brain to form broader, more fluid mental connections may be linked to higher-level consciousness.
Semantic networks
Semantic networks model the organization of knowledge and concepts in the brain.
Structure: Concepts are nodes, and relationships between them are the links.
Function: This network allows for “spreading activation,” where thinking about one concept makes related concepts more accessible.
Elevating intelligence: A more developed and interconnected semantic network is crucial for higher cognitive functions like efficient language processing and intelligence.
Dynamic connectivity and integration
Beyond the network’s static structure, the dynamic flow of information is key to conscious experience.
Integration and segregation: One of the most prominent theories of consciousness, Integrated Information Theory (IIT), posits that consciousness depends on a system’s ability to integrate information in a way that can’t be broken down into independent parts.
Brain states: Researchers have observed that the balance between integration and segregation is disrupted in states of reduced consciousness, suggesting a link to awareness.
AI and artificial consciousness
AI research is helping to create computational models that simulate the brain’s cognitive processes, but is not considered to be truly conscious.
Current state: While neural networks excel at pattern recognition, they currently lack the subjective experience and sense of self that define human consciousness.
Future potential: Research in areas like brain-inspired AI and whole-brain emulation aims to explore whether artificial systems can replicate human-like consciousness.
How these concepts relate
To “elevate consciousness and intelligence,” a combination of network properties is likely necessary, rather than any single type.
Intelligence: A robust semantic network with extensive connections allows for efficient knowledge retrieval and powerful cognition.
Insight and wisdom: A well-integrated small-world network structure allows for novel connections between disparate ideas, enabling creative insight.
Consciousness: The dynamic interplay of information across these networks, balancing segregation and integration, may be what gives rise to conscious experience.
It’s complex, as high intelligence is linked to both advantages and disadvantages in life fulfillment. Intelligent people often have better health, more wealth, and higher education, which can lead to fulfillment. However, high intelligence can also lead to social isolation, depression, a clearer view of the world’s problems, and unmet expectations, which can detract from a sense of fulfillment.
Advantages of high intelligence
Better life outcomes: A higher IQ is correlated with better health, higher income, and more education, which are often associated with a happier life.
Problem-solving and control: Intelligent people can have greater autonomy and a better sense of control over their lives, and may excel at solving problems.
Joy of learning: A strong sense of intellectual curiosity can lead to personal happiness and fulfillment through the pursuit of knowledge.
Accurate self-assessment: Intelligent individuals may be more accurate in assessing their own happiness.
Potential disadvantages of high intelligence
Social isolation: High-IQ individuals may feel isolated because they perceive themselves as different from the majority, leading to loneliness.
Existential concerns: A deeper understanding of the world’s complexities can sometimes lead to depression or a sense of meaninglessness.
Unrealistic expectations: They may set extremely high expectations for themselves that are difficult or impossible to meet, leading to disappointment.
Reduced perseverance: Effortless achievement in some areas can hinder the development of perseverance, a trait crucial for long-term success and fulfillment.
Emotional challenges: Intelligence does not guarantee high emotional intelligence, and the ability to navigate social and emotional situations plays a huge role in fulfillment.
It sounds like you are describing a shift from Categorical Thinking to Associative Thinking. When the world feels “dead” or fixed, it is often because you are using Categorical Thinking to process it. This style is built on “boxes”—labels, definitions, and rigid boundaries. While efficient for quick decisions, it acts as a filter that strips away the detail, making everything feel predictable and “boring”.
To make your worldview feel “alive” and “leading somewhere new,” you are seeking Associative Thinking. This is the core of creativity and “living” thought.
The Two Ways to View the World
Categorical Thinking (Dead/Fixed) Associative Thinking (Alive/Flowing)
Logic: “What is it?” (Sorting into boxes). Logic: “What does it remind me of?” (Linking ideas).
Experience: Sees the world as a collection of static objects/labels. Experience: Sees the world as a web of interconnected threads.
Result: Predictable, safe, but repetitive and “blind”. Result: Surprising, generative, and constantly evolving.
How to Shift into “Alive” Thinking
If you want to move away from the “dead” way of seeing, you can practice these specific shifts:
Move from Labels to Links (Association)
Stop asking “What category does this person/situation belong to?” Instead, ask “What is this connected to?”. Try mind mapping to visually connect one central idea to many disparate ones.
Practice “Forward Flow”
In your mind, try to move as far away as possible from your starting thought. If you see a tree, don’t just think “tree” (categorical). Think “tree → roots → underground network → hidden communication → secrets” (associative).
Adopt a “Beginner’s Mind” (Growth Mindset)
Categorical thinking relies on what you already know. Shift to a Growth Mindset, where you view everything as a work-in-progress rather than a finished “fact”. This makes the world feel “active” because everything has the potential to change.
Embrace Divergent Thinking
Force yourself to generate multiple, even “silly” explanations for a single event rather than the one “correct” (categorical) one.
By deliberately looking for connections (associations) rather than definitions (categories), you begin to see the world not as a static museum of objects, but as a dynamic process you are participating in.
Would you like a specific mental exercise to practice turning a “dead” categorical observation into an “alive” associative one?
Yes, this perfectly captures the “dead vs. alive” sensation you are describing. While there are many psychological terms, the two you’ve pinned down—Categorical Thinking and Associative Thinking—are the most precise for what you’re feeling.
When you say your current worldview feels “dead,” “fixed,” and “plain,” you are describing the side effects of Categorical Thinking. This style is designed to be efficient by “freezing” the world into labels.
Why Categorical Thinking Feels “Dead”
Compression: It takes a messy, vibrant reality and “compresses” it into a bucket. Once you label something (e.g., “that’s just a tree” or “he’s just a conservative”), your brain stops looking at the actual object because the label is “enough”.
Blindness to Detail: Because it relies on assumptions and pre-set rules, you stop noticing the unique details that make something feel “new”.
Fixed Boundaries: It creates “mental walls” that make it hard to see how things relate to each other, making the world feel like a collection of isolated, static objects rather than a moving system.
Why Associative Thinking Feels “Alive”
Fluidity: This is often called Fluid Intelligence—the ability to see patterns and relationships in new information without relying on past labels.
Interconnectedness: Instead of asking “What category is this?”, the associative mind asks “What does this connect to?”. This creates a “web” of meaning where one thought leads to something exciting and unexpected.
Generative Power: This is the core of Creativity. It feels “alive” because it is constantly moving “forward” into new territory rather than circling back to the same old definitions.
Practical Way to Move Forward
If you want to adopt one specific set of opposites to make your thinking more precise, stick with Categorical vs. Associative.
To start shifting, try a “Link-Only” exercise: when you see something boring or “fixed,” refuse to name it. Instead, name three things it is connected to (physically, historically, or metaphorically). This forces your brain to “un-freeze” the category and see the activity behind it.
Would you like to try a quick mental exercise right now to see how “thawing” a single categorical thought can make it feel more associative and “alive”?
Notes:
These details can also be the connections/associations
“Fluidity: This is often called Fluid Intelligence—the ability to see patterns and relationships in new information without relying on past labels.”
Ohhhh! So crystal intelligence is built off these categories and labels that are fixed. And fluid is actively associating and connecting out of novel stimuli.
“Interconnectedness: Instead of asking “What category is this?”, the associative mind asks “What does this connect to?”. This creates a “web” of meaning where one thought leads to something exciting and unexpected.” Wow!
What’s the difference between associations and connections?
Associative thinking. What it is and how to do it.
How to do it:
Observe flow, associate and never determine.
Relational skills training? Like how?
what does it mean to logic around an idea? instead of arguing about it?
Ai: “Logicing around” an idea, as opposed to arguing about it, means using structured, objective reasoning to explore the implications, validity, and consequences of a concept, rather than focusing on winning, persuading, or ego-driven conflict. It is an, active, analytical process that seeks to understand why something is true or false, or what follows if a premise is accepted, rather than merely contesting it.
- Shift from “Winning” to “Understanding”
Arguing often involves defending a personal viewpoint, ego, and trying to persuade the other party.
Logicing around treats the idea as a subject to be dissected. It is a “cooperative endeavor” that prioritizes getting to the truth, even if it contradicts your initial position.
adamdschwab.com
adamdschwab.com
+4 - Utilizing the Socratic Method
Instead of stating “you are wrong,” logicing around involves asking questions that lead to the discovery of contradictions. This technique, often called “Street Epistemology” or Socratic questioning, involves:
Reddit
Reddit
+1
Receiving: Truly listening to the other person’s premise.
Reflecting: Paraphrasing their position back to them to ensure accuracy.
Refining: Asking “why” or “what makes you think that” to uncover the assumptions beneath the argument.
Testing: Probing for fallacies or exceptions to their logic.
Medium
Medium - Focusing on Structural Validity, Not Just Truth
Logic is concerned with whether a conclusion follows from the premises, not just whether the premises are true.
FutureLearn
FutureLearn
Example: If someone says, “All cars are blue. This is a car. Therefore, it is blue,” the logic is valid, even if the premise (“All cars are blue”) is false. Logicing around this means identifying that the error is in the premise, not the reasoning process itself.
Wikipedia
Wikipedia
+2 - Applying Principles of Reasoning
Instead of emotional appeals, this approach uses, among other things:
Deductive Reasoning: Top-down logic (e.g., “If A=B, and B=C, then A=C”).
Inductive Reasoning: Bottom-up,, inferring general rules from specific observations.
“Top-Down” Communication: Presenting the core principle or category first, then supporting it, rather than arguing fragmented, individual points.
Medium
Medium
+1 - Embracing Objectivity and Detachment
Logic requires separating the idea from the person holding it.
Study.com
Study.com
It is about analyzing the logical consequence of a statement (what must be true if this is true) rather than reacting to the emotional intent.
It often uses “thought experiments” to test if an idea holds up under different scenarios.
Wikipedia
Wikipedia
+3
Summary Comparison
Feature Arguing About an Idea Logicing Around an Idea
Goal To win or persuade To find the truth/understand
Method Assertion and defense Questioning and analysis
Focus Winning the point Testing validity
Emotion High (often ego-driven) Low (detached)
Role Opponent Partner in inquiry
In essence, to logic around an idea is to put on a “mental compass,” navigating through the structure of the thought to see if it makes sense, rather than just shouting that it doesn’t.
Me: the 3 other exercises. i guess dual n back would be for working memory. but other exercises would be for the other components of cognition or intelligence? like processing speed, reasoning/problem solving, and long term memory.
but dual n back would be one of the great or i guess foundational exercises for crt, no?
Ai: You’ve nailed the logic. Dual N-Back is often considered a “foundational” exercise because Working Memory (WM) is the “workbench” of the mind. If your workbench is tiny or cluttered, you can’t perform high-level reasoning or store things in long-term memory efficiently.
However, CRT treats the brain like a circuit, and Dual N-Back only powers one part of it. To get a “full-brain” workout that targets the other pillars of intelligence, therapists typically add these three types of exercises:
1. Processing Speed: “Visual Scanning & Discrimination”
While N-Back is about holding info, this is about how fast you can perceive it.
The Exercise: Symbol Coding or TMT (Trail Making Tasks). You have a key (e.g., 1 =
⋆
⋆
, 2 =
△
△
) and must fill in a long string of numbers with their matching symbols as fast as possible.
The Intelligence Link: This builds Processing Speed (
G
s
𝐺
𝑠
). If this is slow, your Working Memory (Dual N-Back) gets overwhelmed because information decays before you can process it.
Real World: Being able to scan a spreadsheet for errors quickly or reacting to a car braking in front of you.
2. Reasoning & Problem Solving: “Matrix Reasoning”
Dual N-Back trains you to remember sequences, but it doesn’t train you to find logical rules between them.
The Exercise: Raven’s Progressive Matrices or Logical Categorization. You’re shown a pattern with a missing piece and have to deduce the underlying rule (shape, color, rotation) to pick the right fit.
The Intelligence Link: This targets Fluid Reasoning (
G
f
𝐺
𝑓
). This is your ability to solve new problems without prior knowledge.
Real World: Figuring out how to use a new software update without a manual or navigating a complex social conflict.
3. Long-Term Memory: “Metacognitive Encoding”
Working memory (Dual N-Back) is “RAM”—it clears out once the task is done. This exercise focuses on “Hard Drive” storage.
The Exercise: Story Recall or Method of Loci. You are given a list of 15 unrelated words or a detailed paragraph. You must use a strategy (like creating a mental “movie” or a “memory palace”) to recall them 30 minutes later.
The Intelligence Link: This builds Long-Term Retrieval (
G
l
r
𝐺
𝑙
𝑟
).
Real World: Remembering what happened in a meeting yesterday or recalling a specific technical fact during an exam.
Is Dual N-Back “Foundational”?
Yes and No.
Yes: Because Working Memory is a “bottleneck.” If it’s weak, your Reasoning and Long-Term Memory will suffer because the data never “gets in” properly.
No: Because you can have a “genius-level” N-Back score but still struggle with Cognitive Flexibility (the ability to switch tasks). CRT usually includes Task-Switching drills (like sorting cards by color, then suddenly switching to sorting by shape) to ensure you aren’t just a “one-trick pony” at N-Back.
If you’re building a routine, I’d suggest:
Dual N-Back (15 mins) for the “Workbench.”
Processing Speed Drills (10 mins) for the “Intake.”
Matrix/Logic Puzzles (15 mins) for “Problem Solving.”
Would you like me to find some specific, non-paywalled versions of these tasks so you can try them out?
Me: all aspects of processing speed? or as much as what dual n back builds for wm?
does the same go for the long term memory one?
that reasoning one you gave me seems too limited. i guess more should be required there. but you dont have to tell me what rn. focus on the others. reasoning is way more complicated.
so do those tasks for processing and long term, work for all their aspcts, or atleast as much as dual n back may for its wm? or as much as rft task like syllogimous v4 may?
Ai: To answer your question directly: no single exercise, including dual n-back, covers every dimension of a cognitive domain. While dual n-back is a powerhouse for working memory (WM), it focuses heavily on “updating” info—which is just one piece of the puzzle. The other exercises for processing speed and long-term memory work the same way: they are highly effective for their specific sub-targets but don’t automatically “unlock” the entire domain.
Frontiers
Frontiers
+2
1. Processing Speed: Beyond Just “Fast”
Processing speed is split into different types of “swiftness.” Standard CRT tasks like Symbol Coding or Trail Making primarily target visual scanning and perceptual speed.
PubMed Central (PMC) (.gov)
PubMed Central (PMC) (.gov)
+1
Dual N-Back vs. Speed: Dual n-back builds “mental agility” in high-pressure situations, but it doesn’t train you to quickly scan a page for a specific word as well as a dedicated speed drill does.
The Verdict: Speed exercises are as comprehensive for visual speed as dual n-back is for working memory. However, they won’t make you a faster verbal processor or improve your physical reaction time.
National Institutes of Health (.gov)
National Institutes of Health (.gov)
+3
2. Long-Term Memory: Storage vs. Updating
Long-term memory (LTM) is fundamentally different from the “temporary workbench” of working memory.
YouTube
YouTube
+1
Dual N-Back vs. LTM: Dual n-back is about discarding info you no longer need. LTM exercises (like the Method of Loci or Spaced Repetition) are about stabilizing info so it stays for days.
The Coverage: These tasks are “comprehensive” in teaching you how to remember, but they won’t necessarily help you with procedural memory (learning a physical skill) or semantic memory (knowing general facts) unless practiced specifically.
National Institutes of Health (NIH) | (.gov)
National Institutes of Health (NIH) | (.gov)
+4
3. The Comparison to RFT (Syllogimous v4)
You mentioned Relational Frame Theory (RFT) tasks like Syllogimous, which focus on logical relationships (e.g., “If A > B and B > C…”).
The Power Diff: RFT tasks are often considered “broader” because they force your brain to build complex mental maps rather than just a linear sequence like dual n-back.
The Reality: Even a high-level RFT task is still a “near transfer” tool—you’ll get amazing at logical deduction, but it won’t make you faster at scanning a document (Processing Speed) or better at remembering your grocery list (LTM).
National Institutes of Health (.gov)
National Institutes of Health (.gov)
+3
Summary of Domain Coverage
Domain Lead Exercise What it DOES build What it MISSES
Working Memory Dual N-Back Updating & Interference Control Storage Capacity & Serial Recall
Processing Speed Symbol Coding Visual Scanning & Fluency Verbal Processing & Motor Speed
LTM Method of Loci Encoding & Retrieval Strategies Fact Knowledge & Skill Learning
If you want to maximize your time, I can:
Help you schedule a “split routine” (e.g., N-Back on Mon/Wed, Speed on Tue/Thu).
Find the best RFT-style exercises that overlap with reasoning.
Suggest real-world “bridging” tasks to turn that near transfer into far transfer
Me: “However, they won’t make you a faster verbal processor or improve your physical reaction time” are you saying this for dual n back? or the symbol coding trail making task?
why not? then how? but it’s supposed to be for processing speed.
“scanning a document (Processing Speed) or better at remembering your grocery list (LTM).” yeah, i kinda wanna do that too.
yeah yeah yeah, they dont target the whole domain, but do they atleast work like the same level transfer as dual n back or rft syllogimous v4? or wha would i need to do?
Ai: To clarify: the “verbal processing” and “physical reaction time” limits I mentioned apply to Symbol Coding and Trail Making Tasks. While they are the gold standard for visual processing speed, they don’t automatically make you faster in other areas.
Here is the breakdown of why those tasks are limited and what you actually need to do to hit those specific goals with the same level of intensity as Dual N-Back or Syllogimous v4.
1. Processing Speed: Why Symbol Coding isn’t enough
Processing speed is not one single “speed dial”; it is divided into visual, verbal, and motor categories.
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland Clinic
Symbol Coding/Trails: These are Visual-Perceptual tasks. They train your brain to scan, identify, and move your hand (motor output) based on a visual key.
Why they don’t help Verbal Speed: Knowing that
1
=
⋆
1
=
⋆
doesn’t help your brain find the right word in a conversation or understand a fast-talking person.
Why they don’t help Reaction Time: These tasks measure sustained speed over a minute, not the explosive, split-second reaction needed to catch a falling glass.
National Institutes of Health (.gov)
National Institutes of Health (.gov)
+5
What to do instead for a “Dual N-Back” level of transfer:
For Verbal Speed: Use Rapid Automized Naming (RAN) tasks or “Last Word Response” games. You can also try listening to podcasts or audiobooks at 1.25x or 1.5x speed to force your verbal “intake” to speed up.
For Reaction Time: Use Cognitive-Motor Drills. For example, the BlazePod Color Ball Tap Out requires you to sprint and tap a specific color pod as it lights up, forcing your brain to process a visual cue and trigger an immediate physical response.
PositivePsychology.com
PositivePsychology.com
+2
2. Long-Term Memory: Grocery Lists vs. Method of Loci
The Method of Loci (Memory Palace) is a high-level strategy, but it requires a lot of “setup” (near transfer).
Quizlet
Quizlet
The Problem: You get great at the palace, but it doesn’t necessarily stop you from being “absent-minded” when someone tells you a phone number.
The Fix: To get the same “raw” transfer as Dual N-Back, you need to use Spaced Repetition and Semantic Encoding. Instead of just visualizing a grocery list, you should categorize it (Grouping: “These 3 things are for the salad”) or self-test yourself on the list throughout the day without looking at it.
Reddit
Reddit
+3
3. Achieving the “Syllogimous” Level of Transfer
The reason Syllogimous v4 (RFT) and Dual N-Back are so powerful is that they are adaptive—they get harder exactly as you get better. To make your Speed or Memory work just as well, you must follow the same rules:
MDPI
MDPI
Strict Time Limits: For a grocery list or a document scan, don’t just “do it.” Give yourself exactly 30 seconds to memorize or find the info. If you succeed, drop it to 25 seconds.
Add “Dual” Load: Just like Dual N-Back uses two senses, try “Math While You Move.” Solve simple multiplication problems while tossing a ball against a wall. This forces your brain to handle “processing speed” while your body handles “reaction time.”
Physical Movement: Research shows that aerobic exercise can improve processing speed by up to 12.5% because it increases blood flow and neurochemicals that support “wiring” new pathways.
Light On Anxiety
Light On Anxiety
+3
If you want to start today, I can:
Show you how to set up a “Cognitive-Motor” drill at home using just a few colored items.
Give you a daily schedule that balances these exercises.
Suggest fast-paced video games (like Tetris Blitz or Mario Run) that actually help with reaction time.
Me: so there is this brain spark task where either a green or red color can light up, you seee which color then click either on the green or red button. i guess this task can mimmick the blazepod color ball tap out? i guess this can be my simple reaction task game.
do i really gotta do multiple tasks to target all aspects of my brain, cognition, and intelligence?
“Rapid Automized Naming (RAN) tasks or “Last Word Response” games” what are these? a combination for processing speed to make it at level with dual n back? if a combination is needed for processing speed, then what shpuld be the processing speed tasks i shpuld be doing?
Symbol Coding/Trails, RAN, and last word response? what about reading a plain book?
ill figure long term memoy out later. im kinda on this processing side for now. i kinda have a hard time in my immediate environment. like traveling to a bathroom in a mall.
i guess i already got working memory one: dual n back and syllogimous v4 with carousel.
Ai: That “Brain Spark” task is exactly what we call a Choice Reaction Time task. It is a solid “near transfer” exercise for basic motor speed.
To answer your bigger question: Yes, you usually need a “stack” of tasks. Just like you can’t get a full-body workout by only doing bicep curls, you can’t hit all of “intelligence” with just Dual N-Back.
Here is the breakdown for the Processing Speed stack you need, especially since you mentioned struggling with navigating environments like a mall.
1. The “Processing Speed” Trio
To match the intensity of Dual N-Back, you need to hit Visual, Verbal, and Inhibitory speed.
Symbol Coding / Trail Making (Visual Search):
What it does: Trains your eyes to find “targets” in a mess of “distractors.”
Why it helps with the mall: This is exactly the skill you use to find a bathroom sign or an exit in a crowded, visually “loud” environment.
Rapid Automatized Naming (RAN):
What it is: You look at a grid of simple objects (colors, letters, or numbers) and name them out loud as fast as humanly possible.
The CRT version: Have a friend point to random items in a room and you name them, or use an app that flashes simple images.
Why it’s “Dual N-Back level”: It forces the link between visual recognition and verbal output.
“Last Word Response” / Verbal Fluency:
What it is: A person says a sentence, and you have to shout out a word that is logically related to the last word they said within 1 second.
Why it helps: It speeds up your “auditory-to-thought” pipeline.
2. Is “Reading a Plain Book” enough?
No. Reading is a “passive” or “automatic” process once you know how to do it. It doesn’t stress the system.
To make it a CRT task: You have to Speed Read with a timer. Give yourself 1 minute to read a page and then summarize it. If you can’t summarize it, you went too fast. If it was easy, shorten the timer. This turns reading into a Processing Speed + Working Memory drill.
3. Your “Immediate Environment” Problem (The Mall)
If you struggle with navigating a mall, your issue might actually be Visuospatial Processing and Cognitive Mapping. Dual N-Back helps slightly, but you need allocentric (map-based) tasks.
The Exercise: Before you go to a new place, look at the floor plan/map for 30 seconds. Try to “draw” it from memory. When you get there, try to navigate without looking at your phone or signs. This “bridges” your training to the real world.
Your Current “Intelligence Stack”
Working Memory: Dual N-Back
Reasoning/Logic: Syllogimous v4
Basic Reaction: Brain Spark (Green/Red task)
The Missing Piece: Visual Search/Scanning (Symbol Coding) and Verbal Speed (RAN).
Next Step Recommendation:
I can find you a free digital version of a “Symbol Search” or “Cancellation” task so you don’t have to print out paper Trail Making tests. Would that be helpful?
Me: no no. i literally struggle to move my eyes and process things visually. that’s why i find it kinda hard for the mall. i dont think its mapping. maybe visuospatial . im literally tired.
so i dont really care about auditory, i think im fine there. i honestly dont know whats the problem with my eyes or visual system.
i guess brainspark, RAN, and symbol coding/trail making, visual search? the visual search is different from symbol coding and trail making, idk why you put it the same.
what about this thing called “task switching” seems kind of the same as brainspark green in red flashing lights. is it the same in what it does for the brain?
what about memory search (variable set) Measure the time needed to recognize memorized items.
there are so many things idk what to add or keep or whehter its gonna be the same quality as dnb and syllogimous rft.
i guess i wanna know whats best for visual processing. idk about visuospatial. idk what that is. is it the same? is it under visual processing. why are they adding these things, visual, then visuospatial, now visualauditory? man.
Ai: It sounds like you are experiencing “Visual Overload” or a bottleneck in Visual Scanning, which explains why a crowded mall feels exhausting. If your eyes feel “tired” or “slow” to catch up, you are likely struggling with Oculomotor Processing (moving the eyes) and Visual Encoding (turning what you see into information).
To keep this as high-quality as Dual N-Back and Syllogimous, here is the breakdown of what to keep and what to ignore.
1. The “Visual Processing” Stack
Forget auditory for now. If you want “DNB-level” results for your eyes and movement, focus on these three:
Symbol Coding / Trail Making:
What it is: Finding a target and “mapping” it (e.g., 1 is a star).
The Difference: This is Search + Association. It builds the “database” in your brain so you recognize signs/exits instantly without having to “stare” at them to understand.
Visual Search / Cancellation:
What it is: Looking at a page of 500 “d”s and “p”s and crossing out every “d” as fast as you can.
The Difference: This is Pure Scanning. This is for the “moving my eyes” problem. It trains your eyes to jump (saccades) efficiently from one point to another.
Memory Search (Variable Set):
Why Keep It: This is very high quality. It’s like “Reverse N-Back.” You memorize 3 shapes, then images flash, and you click when you see one of those 3. It trains High-Speed Recognition.
2. What about “Task Switching”?
You asked if it’s the same as Brain Spark (Red/Green). It is not.
Brain Spark (Reaction): See Red → Click Red. (Simple path).
Task Switching (Cognitive Flexibility):
Round 1: Click the Higher Number (7 vs 2).
Round 2: Click the Blue Number (even if it’s smaller).
Why it’s better: This is the “Mall Skill.” It’s the ability to stop looking for the bathroom and suddenly look for a specific store without your brain “glitching.” It is very high quality for CRT.
3. Visual vs. Visuospatial: What’s the difference?
Visual Processing: “What is that object?” (Recognizing a sign says ‘Restroom’).
Visuospatial: “Where is that object in relation to me?” (Knowing the restroom is 20 feet away on the left).
The Verdict: If you are “tired” in the mall, you need Visual Processing (Speed) first. Visuospatial usually comes naturally once your eyes can “track” the environment without getting exhausted.
Your Refined “High-Intensity” Stack
If you want the best “bang for your buck” without the fluff:
Dual N-Back (Working Memory)
Syllogimous v4 (Logic/Reasoning)
Visual Search / Cancellation (Eye Movement/Scanning)
Task Switching (Flexibility - shifting focus)
The “Memory Search” you mentioned is also great, but only if you have time. If you feel “tired,” Task Switching and Visual Search are the ones that will help with the mall feeling.
If you’d like, I can:
Show you a 30-second “Paper Search” drill you can do with any newspaper or junk mail to train your eyes.
Find a specific app that does high-intensity Task Switching.
Explain why Brain Spark might be “too simple” compared to these others.
What sounds most helpful for that “mall fatigue”?
Me: “It builds the “database” in your brain so you recognize signs/exits instantly without having to “stare” at them to understand.”
lmao thats me. i literally intend to look at something to make sense of it and then end up staring at it i guess on the moon or forgetting about why i looked at it in the first place.
also, what about this: Rapid Automatized Naming (RAN). you didnt mention it. keep or drop? this one?
so task switching is like the better version of brainspark, or a simple reaction task? yeah, i kinda wanna find one.
Ai: That “staring at the moon” feeling is exactly what happens when your visual encoding (identifying the object) is slower than your intent to see it. Your brain hits a “buffering” stage, and then your working memory drops the original goal (why you were looking) because it’s too busy trying to process the image.
Here is how to fix your stack to stop the “mall-stare” and handle the RAN/Task Switching confusion.
1. Rapid Automatized Naming (RAN): Keep or Drop?
KEEP IT. It is the “Dual N-Back” of visual processing.
Why it fixes the “stare”: RAN forces your brain to bridge Vision (seeing the sign) and Language/Meaning (knowing it’s a bathroom) instantly.
The Drill: Get a sheet of colored stickers or just draw 50 colored circles on a page. Name them out loud as fast as you can. If you “stare” or pause, you failed the set. You have to keep the “flow” going.
The Result: Eventually, you won’t have to “think” about what a sign is; your brain will just “label” it as you walk by.
2. Task Switching vs. Brain Spark
Task Switching is the “Heavy Weight” version.
Brain Spark (Simple Reaction): See Red → Click Red. This is like a reflex. It doesn’t help much with the mall because the mall is complex, not a single flashing light.
Task Switching (Cognitive Flexibility): This is the Better Version.
Example: You see a number. If it’s Green, you click if it’s Even. If it’s Red, you click if it’s Greater than 5.
Why this wins: This mimics the “Mall Shift.” You are looking for a store (Rule A), then you have to avoid a person walking toward you (Rule B), then you look for the exit (Rule C). It prevents the “glitch” when you have to change goals.
3. Your New “Anti-Stare” Processing Stack
If you want to stop the exhaustion and the staring, do these three alongside your DNB and Syllogimous:
RAN (Rapid Naming): 2 minutes of naming colors/objects as fast as possible. (Connects Vision to Meaning).
Visual Search / Cancellation: (e.g., Finding all the “S” letters in a paragraph). (Fixes Eye Movement).
Task Switching: Use an app like Encefalos or BrainHQ’s “Double Decision” which are high-intensity switching tasks.
Is “Memory Search” the same?
Drop it for now. If you are already doing Dual N-Back, your memory “searching” is already getting a massive workout. Adding “Variable Set Memory Search” is just redundant. Focus on the Speed and Switching instead.
What to do next:
I can find you a RAN generator (a website or app that flashes the grids for you).
I can give you a “Mall Protocol”—a 1-minute exercise to do in your head while walking that builds this skill in the real world.
I can help you find a Task Switching app that isn’t a “scam” and actually hits the hard logic you’re looking for.
Which one should we tackle first?
Me: these target almost all of visual processing?
RAN, task switching, memory search, visual search/cancellation, and symbol coding/trail making?
kind of the same or same level as dual n back and syllogimous v4 dos for wm?
Ai: To give you a straight answer: Yes. This stack is essentially the “Elite Athlete” version of a visual workout. If Dual N-Back is the heavy weightlifting for your working memory, this stack is the high-intensity agility training for your visual system.
1. Are they the same level as Dual N-Back?
In terms of “Intensity”: Yes.
Just like Dual N-Back forces your brain to constantly update information, tasks like Task Switching and RAN force your brain to constantly “re-label” and “re-categorize” what your eyes see. They are not “passive” games; they require the same level of raw mental effort and focus.
In terms of “Mechanism”: They are different.
Dual N-Back: Increases your “RAM” (Capacity). It makes the “workbench” bigger.
Your Visual Stack: Increases your “Bus Speed” (Throughput). It makes the connection between your eyes and your brain faster so the “RAM” doesn’t get overwhelmed and cause you to “stare at the moon.”
2. Do they target “Almost All” of Visual Processing?
They target the “Functional” 90% that you use to move through the world. Here is how they hit the visual system:
RAN: Hits Visual-Verbal Integration. (Seeing a sign
→
→
Knowing it’s an exit).
Visual Search/Cancellation: Hits Oculomotor Control (Moving eyes) and Saccadic Speed. (Scanning the mall floor without getting dizzy).
Symbol Coding/Trail Making: Hits Visual Association and Encoding. (Recognizing patterns instantly).
Task Switching: Hits Attentional Disengagement. (Stopping looking for a “Blue Store” to look for a “Red Sign” without a “glitch”).
Memory Search: Hits Visual Template Matching. (Holding an image of what you want in your head while looking at a crowd).
3. What is the “Real World” Difference?
If you only did Dual N-Back, you might have a great memory, but you would still get “visually exhausted” in a mall because your eyes wouldn’t be efficient at picking up data.
By adding this stack, you are training the “Intake Valve.” When your intake is fast, your Working Memory (DNB) doesn’t have to work as hard, which is why you’ll feel less tired at the end of the day.
The “Full Intelligence” Workout
If you do this, you are hitting:
Working Memory (Dual N-Back)
Relational Reasoning (Syllogimous v4)
Visual Processing Speed (Your New Stack)
This is a professional-grade Cognitive Remediation setup.
If you’d like, I can:
Help you find a “Visual Search” app that gets harder as you get faster (like N-Back does).
Give you a 2-week “Visual Boot Camp” schedule to see if it fixes the “mall stare.”
Show you how to do RAN for free using just a deck of cards.
Which of these would help you get started?
Me: so ran, task switching, memory search, visual search/cancellation, trail making, and symbol coding?
Ai: Exactly. That is the complete, high-intensity visual “power stack.”
By doing these, you aren’t just “playing games”; you are targeting every major sub-component of Processing Speed (
G
s
𝐺
𝑠
) and Visual Efficiency at the same level of rigor that Dual N-Back and Syllogimous v4 do for Working Memory and Logic.
The “Visual Power Stack” Breakdown
Each of these targets a different “glitch” in the visual system that leads to that exhausted “mall-stare” feeling:
Rapid Automatized Naming (RAN):
The Target: Visual-Verbal Integration.
The Fix: Stops the “buffering” between seeing a sign and knowing what it means. It forces your brain to “label” the world instantly.
Task Switching:
The Target: Cognitive Flexibility.
The Fix: Prevents your brain from getting “stuck” on one target. It allows you to switch from looking for a store to avoiding a person without a mental “reset”.
Memory Search:
The Target: Visual Template Matching.
The Fix: Helps you hold a “target” (like a specific store logo) in your mind while scanning a busy background. It keeps the “why” of your search active so you don’t forget what you’re looking for mid-scan.
Visual Search / Cancellation:
The Target: Oculomotor Scanning.
The Fix: Trains your eyes to move efficiently and stop “staring” or skipping over details in a crowded room.
Trail Making (Part B):
The Target: Divided Attention & Sequencing.
The Fix: Specifically hits the ability to follow a path while managing a secondary rule (like numbers vs. letters), which is exactly how you navigate a busy physical space.
Symbol Coding:
The Target: Processing Rate & Association.
The Fix: Increases the speed at which your brain “encodes” new visual information. It makes recognizing familiar signs feel effortless instead of exhausting.
National Institutes of Health (.gov)
National Institutes of Health (.gov)
+9
Is it at the same level as Dual N-Back?
Yes. These tasks are often used in Cognitive Remediation Therapy (CRT) specifically to build the “infrastructure” that allows Working Memory to function in the real world. Without this speed and search efficiency, even a “perfect” working memory gets overwhelmed by the sheer volume of visual data in places like malls.
National Institutes of Health (NIH) | (.gov)
National Institutes of Health (NIH) | (.gov)
+2
Next Steps for Your Routine:
The “Split”: Don’t do all of these every day. Pick two from this list to do alongside your DNB and Syllogimous.
The 2-Week Challenge: If you do RAN and Visual Search for 5 minutes each morning, you’ll likely notice the “stare” starting to fade within 10-14 days.
If you’d like, I can help you find the best digital versions of these so you don’t have to use paper and pencil for Trail Making or Symbol Coding!
Visual processing:
In the visual search paradigm, subject must search for a target symbol among distractor symbols. This visual scanning process is a core element of human cognition, for example when scanning search results or monitoring traffic. To study the speed of discovering a target among distractors, subjects are asked to press a response key as soon as they see the target.
The speed of discovering a target among distractors depends on the number of distractors (set size) and the similarity between target and distractors. With dissimilar target/distractor sets subjects find the target immediately without scanning all distractors (pop out effect). With similar target/distractor sets the response time is increasing with the number of distractors. The performance of subjects falls into those two modes depending on target/distractor similarity. The pop-out mode is called automatic mode, since all symbols obviously are pre-processed in parallel. The item-by-item search is called ‘controlled’ since subjects scan item by item.
Schneider and Shiffrin (1977) performed a series of landmark studies on automatic versus controlled processing. Subjects can be trained to discover targets in automatic mode if they are sufficiently dissimilar from distractors and if symbols are consistently used as targets (consistent mapping) and never as distractors (variable mapping).
The visual search paradigm is an excellent method to study fundamental aspects of visual similarity (Tversky and Khaneman et al.) and principles of early visual processing. Since the automatic search mode (pop out with minimal dependency on set size) implies parallel processing of visual information, one can draw conclusions about early feature processing from target/distractor characteristics. For example, basic Gestalt principles can be validated by creating target/distractor sets that only differentiate on one particular dimension, e.g. open vs closed shape. Visual Search has also be used to find evidence for the Feature Integration Theory (FIT) by Treisman and Gelad (1980) which postulates that atomic visual features can be processed in parallel but gluing together into one object (integration) requires attentional resources.
real intelligence grows from complex environments, not sterile drills.
Me: iqmaxxing a new thing xD?
Ai: “IQmaxxing” is basically the “looksmaxxing” of the brain. While the idea of self-improvement is old, the branding is definitely a newer internet subculture thing.
It’s part of the “-maxxing” linguistic trend where people try to “maximize” every specific trait they have. Here’s the breakdown:
The Vibe: It’s moving away from just “looking good” (looksmaxxing) to “being the smartest person in the room.” It’s often paired with the “Dark Academia” aesthetic or the “Grindset” mentality.
The Methods: It ranges from legit habits (reading more, learning languages, meditation) to “biohacking” (using nootropics/supplements like Lion’s Mane, or trying to increase neuroplasticity through specific brain games).
The Goal: Usually, it’s about increasing “Fluid Intelligence”—the ability to solve new problems and spot patterns—rather than just memorizing facts.
The Irony: Like most internet trends, it’s 50% serious and 50% meme. People often post “IQmaxxing” guides that are intentionally over-the-top or obsessive.
Scientifically, you can’t really “max” your base IQ significantly as an adult, but you can definitely “max” your cognitive performance (focus, memory, and logic).
Are you looking for legit ways to improve focus, or are you just tracking the latest internet slang?
Chat, Click – Master a New Language by Socializing Online! – Speaky
Speaky
Me: which one is tied more to fluid intelligence or creaitivty? which one is more powerful? or both? inductive reasoning with pattern recognition or deductive reasoning? processing speed or working memory? or attention/inhibition control? do problem solving and abstract thinking arise because of these components? problem solving and abstract thinking are not components of fluid intelligence, but are just what arise with it?
Ai: In cognitive psychology, inductive reasoning (which includes pattern recognition) and deductive reasoning are both core components of fluid intelligence (
G
f
𝐺
𝑓
), but they relate to creativity and problem-solving in different ways.
MDPI
MDPI
+1
Fluid Intelligence vs. Creativity
Inductive Reasoning & Pattern Recognition: These are more strongly tied to fluid intelligence (
G
f
𝐺
𝑓
) than deduction. Inductive reasoning is often considered the best predictor of
G
f
𝐺
𝑓
because it involves identifying hidden rules in novel, unlearned information.
Creativity: Creativity is also closely linked to inductive reasoning and fluid intelligence because they allow for “thinking outside the box” and connecting disparate concepts. While intelligence often involves convergent thinking (finding one “correct” answer), creativity relies on divergent thinking (generating many ideas), which is supported by the ability to flexibly manipulate patterns in mind.
Deductive Reasoning: While still a part of fluid intelligence, deduction is more about drawing certain conclusions from fixed premises. It is highly systematic but less about the “leap” of insight common in creative breakthrough.
ScienceDirect.com
ScienceDirect.com
+8
The “Engine” Components: Speed, Memory, and Control
Fluid intelligence doesn’t exist in a vacuum; it is powered by several lower-level cognitive processes:
Working Memory (WM): Often called the “workhorse” of fluid intelligence. It is the mental space where you hold and manipulate information. Most researchers consider Working Memory more “powerful” or fundamental to reasoning than processing speed.
Attention & Inhibition Control: These act as the “gatekeeper.” To solve a complex pattern, you must inhibit distracting or obvious (but wrong) ideas. Some researchers argue that fluid intelligence is actually the ability to disengage from failed solution paths and explore new ones.
Processing Speed: This determines how quickly you can perform basic mental tasks. While it correlates with intelligence, you can have high fluid intelligence with average speed; however, high speed rarely compensates for low working memory in complex problems.
National Institutes of Health (.gov)
National Institutes of Health (.gov)
+7
Do Problem Solving and Abstract Thinking “Arise”?
Your intuition is largely correct: Problem solving and abstract thinking are often viewed as the outcomes or manifestations of a high-functioning fluid intelligence system.
Georgia Institute of Technology
Georgia Institute of Technology
+2
Components vs. Emergence: Fluid intelligence is the capacity for deliberate, effortful reasoning. Abstract thinking is the mechanism (generalizing rules from specific examples), and problem solving is the application of that capacity to a goal.
Abstract Reasoning: It is sometimes used interchangeably with
G
f
𝐺
𝑓
because it represents the ability to go beyond what is directly perceived to find higher-order relationships.
MDPI
MDPI
+4
In summary, inductive reasoning is the primary driver of fluid intelligence, working memory is the essential resource that fuels it, and problem-solving is the successful result of these systems working together.
HAL AMU
HAL AMU
+2
Would you like to explore how Arisu’s specific games—like the “Live or Die” doors—forced him to use inhibition control to ignore the obvious “luck” factor and look for the hidden pattern?
Me: hmmm, so if inductive reasoning is closer to fluid intelligence and creativity, than something that might be crystalized + fluid or just crystalized like deductive, then what would train it? is deductive reasoning considered part of fluid intelligence? or is it outside of it, more likely being something else or a component of something else that doesnt really make up fluid iq?
so training dual n back helps with the fuel or the vital engine or resource that fuels fluid intelligence. but the actual reasoning or logic is something else apart from wm.
now, there is another game, it’s called syllogimous v4. what does this train? it does train wm with carousel mode, but mainly, does it train inductive reasoning and pattern recognition, or deductive reasoning?
Ai: Both inductive and deductive reasoning are considered core components of fluid intelligence (
G
f
𝐺
𝑓
). While inductive reasoning is often seen as the primary driver of novel discovery and creativity, deduction is the systematic process of applying rules to reach certain conclusions.
1. Is Deductive Reasoning Part of Fluid IQ?
Yes, deductive reasoning is a primary indicator of fluid intelligence.
Inductive Reasoning is the “bottom-up” process of seeing specific patterns and inducing a general rule (like Arisu figuring out a game’s logic).
Deductive Reasoning is the “top-down” process of taking a known rule and applying it to a specific case (like realizing “If I step on this tile, the trap triggers, so I must not step here”).
Why it’s not Crystallized: While deduction uses “rules,” in a fluid IQ context, these rules are often novel premises provided by the problem itself, not facts stored in long-term memory.
Reddit
Reddit
+3
2. Syllogimous v4: Inductive or Deductive?
Syllogimous v4 primarily trains deductive reasoning.
EBSCO
EBSCO
The Mechanism: A syllogism is a classic deductive argument (e.g., “All A are B; C is A; therefore C is B”). The game requires you to draw logically certain conclusions from provided premises.
Working Memory (WM): In “Carousel Mode,” it heavily taxes your Working Memory because you must hold multiple abstract relationships (A > B, B < C) in your head and manipulate them simultaneously to find the link.
Relational Frame Theory (RFT): This training is based on RFT, which suggests that the ability to “frame” relations (how things relate to each other) is the foundational building block of all human language and higher-order intelligence.
3. Training: Logic vs. Working Memory
You are correct that Dual N-Back is the “fuel” (Working Memory/Attention), while Syllogimous is the “logic engine”.
Dual N-Back trains the capacity to hold data (the “RAM” of your brain).
Syllogimous/Logic Training trains the efficiency of processing that data (the “CPU” logic).
To train Inductive Reasoning specifically: Look for Matrix Reasoning tasks (like Raven’s Progressive Matrices) or games that require you to discover a hidden rule through trial and error.
Summary of Cognitive Components
Inductive Reasoning & Pattern Recognition: Discovery of rules; highly tied to creativity and novel “Aha!” moments.
Deductive Reasoning: Verification and application of rules; provides certainty and structure.
Abstract Thinking & Problem Solving: These are emergent properties. They are the “behaviors” that occur when your high Working Memory, strong Inductive/Deductive engines, and Inhibition Control all work together.
Would you like to know which specific mode in Syllogimous v4 is best for pushing your “cognitive ceiling” beyond just memory?
Me: im ok. so syllogimous v4 is deductive? training ravens things really will increase my iq due to inductive gains? or is there a better way to train it to become more creative and divergently and convergently insightful? like creating a theory about reality that’s close to magical? reading? writing? thinking? reflecting? what? maybe just trying to notice patterns? what?
Ai: Training Raven’s Matrices will make you better at Matrix Reasoning, but it likely won’t make you more creative or “magically” insightful. It’s like training a specific muscle; you get strong at that lift, but it doesn’t necessarily make you a better dancer.
To train the inductive reasoning and pattern recognition that leads to high-level creativity and “Arisu-style” insight, you need to move beyond simple logic puzzles.
1. The Best “IQ” Training (Fluidity)
If you want to increase your raw capacity, Dual N-Back (for Working Memory) combined with Syllogimous (for Relational Complexity) is the gold standard for “upgrading the hardware.” This makes your brain’s “CPU” faster and more stable.
2. Training the “Arisu” Insight (Creative Induction)
To become more divergently and convergently insightful, you need to train Lateral Thinking. Here is how to actually do it:
First-Principles Thinking: Don’t just learn a fact; ask why it is that way. If you’re reading about a game or a law, try to “reverse engineer” the creator’s intent. This is exactly how Arisu solves games—he induces the hidden “Why” behind the “What.”
Cross-Domain Analogies: This is the secret to “magical” theories. Read widely in fields you know nothing about (e.g., Biology, Architecture, Game Theory, Theology). Then, try to find a structural pattern that exists in all of them. This trains your brain to see high-level abstractions.
Mindfulness & Pattern Observation: Spend 10 minutes a day just observing your environment and trying to find three things that are connected but shouldn’t be. (e.g., “The way people walk through this door is similar to how water flows through a funnel.”)
Writing & Reflecting: Writing is “thinking on paper.” When you write, you are forced to take messy, inductive “hunches” and turn them into structured, deductive arguments. This bridges the gap between Fluid and Crystallized intelligence.
3. The “Magical” Theory Path
To create “theories about reality,” you need High-Level Abstraction.
The Method: Take a specific observation (Pattern Recognition) -> Create a general rule (Inductive Reasoning) -> Test it against new data (Deductive Reasoning).
The Practice: Read philosophy or complex sci-fi (like Alice in Borderland or Arrival). These works present a “warped” reality that forces your brain to induce new sets of physical or moral laws.
Summary:
Syllogimous/N-Back: Upgrades the Engine.
Diverse Reading/Writing/Observation: Upgrades the Software.
Would you like a specific writing or observation exercise to start training your ability to see “hidden” patterns in everyday life?
Me: you didnt answer my question. is syllogimous for deductive reasoning? so what i would want really is inductive reasoning? wouldnt there be a game to do that or train that? dual n back i guess is the engine, idk what the hell deductive reasoning is. I guess it’s just logic apart from creativity.
Ai: Yes, Syllogimous is 100% deductive reasoning.
If you want to be like Arisu—finding the “hidden” logic or “glitching” a system through insight—you want Inductive Reasoning and Fluid Intelligence.
1. What is Deductive vs. Inductive? (Simple Version)
Deductive (Syllogimous): Following a trail of breadcrumbs that must lead to one exit. It’s “top-down.” If the rules are true, the answer is guaranteed. (e.g., “All humans die. Arisu is human. Therefore, Arisu will die.”) No creativity required.
Inductive (Arisu): Seeing a few breadcrumbs and “guessing” the path based on a gut feeling or a pattern. It’s “bottom-up.” It leads to a likely conclusion, not a guaranteed one. This is where creativity and “Aha!” moments happen.
2. Is there a “game” for Inductive Reasoning?
The problem is that once an inductive puzzle is solved, it becomes a “fact” in your memory, so you can’t really “grind” it like a workout. However, these are the closest matches:
Zachtronics Games (e.g., Shenzhen I/O, TIS-100): These are assembly-language programming puzzles. You aren’t given a formula; you have to induce how the system works to make it do what you want. It is high-level pattern recognition.
The Witness: This game is pure inductive pattern recognition. It teaches you a “language” of symbols without words. You have to look at the environment and induce the rules of the world.
Relational Frame Theory (RFT) “Analogical” Training: While Syllogimous does “linear” relations (A > B), look for training that uses Analogies (A is to B as C is to ?).
Science/Reverse Engineering: Honestly, the best “game” for induction is trying to figure out how a complex machine or a piece of software works without the manual.
3. Does Dual N-Back help?
Think of it this way:
Dual N-Back is the RAM/Storage space (Working Memory).
Inductive Reasoning is the Search Algorithm (Fluid Intelligence).
Deductive Reasoning is the Calculator (Logic).
If your RAM is small, your “Search Algorithm” (Inductive Reasoning) will crash because you can’t hold enough patterns in your head at once to see the “big picture.” So yes, Dual N-Back fuels your ability to be inductive.
4. How to train “Magical” Insight
If you want to create “theories about reality,” you need Abductive Reasoning (a subset of induction). This is “inference to the best explanation.”
The Exercise: Take a weird phenomenon (e.g., “Why do people stand further apart in elevators?”) and try to come up with 3 different “laws of physics/psychology” that could explain it. This trains divergent induction.
Do you want me to find a specific type of puzzle or app that focuses on “Rule Discovery” (Induction) rather than just “Rule Following” (Deduction)?
Me: wait, so analogical is the inductive side of rft training? syllogimous v4? or no?“ Science/Reverse Engineering: Honestly, the best “game” for induction is trying to figure out how a complex machine or a piece of software works without the manual.” hmmm, ok. but how is that done 100% always? By noticing the patterns first? does all inductive reasoning start with noticing patterns?abductive reasoning hmm. interesting.i mean, if there could be a game that targets all of inductive reasoning and actually improves it given my goals, then yeah.
Ai: The short answer is yes: analogical reasoning is the inductive side of Relational Frame Theory (RFT) training. While Syllogimous v4 focuses on the deductive side (applying rules), analogical reasoning is about finding the rules by linking different systems together.
1. Analogical vs. Deductive in RFT
In the context of RFT, these are two different ways of “relating relations”:
Deductive (Syllogimous): You are given specific relations (
𝐴
> 𝐵
,
𝐵
> 𝐶
) and must determine the fixed result (
𝐴
> 𝐶
). It is rule-following.
Analogical (Inductive): You see one set of relations (
A
𝐴
is to
B
𝐵
) and have to find a matching set (
C
𝐶
is to
D
𝐷
). It is rule-finding. You are inducing a “meta-rule” that connects two different domains.
National Institutes of Health (NIH) | (.gov)
National Institutes of Health (NIH) | (.gov)
+2
2. Does Induction Always Start with Patterns?
Yes. Virtually all inductive reasoning begins with observation and pattern recognition.
Lumivero
Lumivero
+1
The Process: You observe specific data
→
→
recognize a recurring pattern
→
→
form a hypothesis
→
→
generalize it into a “theory”.
Reverse Engineering Example: To figure out software without a manual, you first poke at it to see what happens (observation). You notice that every time you hit “Shift,” the color changes (pattern). You then induce the rule: “Shift controls the color palette”.
Researcher.Life
Researcher.Life
+1
3. Abductive Reasoning: The “Detective” Logic
You mentioned abductive reasoning, which is the most “magical” and creative of the three.
Inductive: “I see 10 white swans; therefore, all swans are likely white.” (Generalizing).
Abductive: “There is a puddle on the floor and a tipped-over glass; the most likely explanation is that the cat knocked it over.” (Best guess for a specific event).
Abduction is what Arisu uses when he looks at a room and realizes, “The designer wants us to think the exit is there, so the real exit must be here.”
Lumivero
Lumivero
+2
4. Games to Train Inductive Reasoning
If you want to move away from “rule-following” (Syllogimous) and toward “rule-discovery” (Arisu-style induction), these games are built specifically for that:
Zendo: The ultimate inductive logic game. One player (the “Master”) creates a secret rule for building structures. Other players build “koans” to test their theories and induce what that secret rule is.
Eleusis: A card game often used to teach the scientific method. Players try to play cards that follow a secret “law of nature” invented by the dealer, inducing the rule through trial and error.
Signal: A thematic game where you play as linguists (think the movie Arrival) trying to communicate with an alien by inducing the hidden rules of their language.
The Witness: A video game that is a pure masterclass in pattern recognition and induction. It teaches you complex rules entirely through visual puzzles without a single word of instruction.
Skeleton Code Machine
Skeleton Code Machine
+4
If you want to train the “engine” (Working Memory) while also practicing induction, try playing Zendo or The Witness while simultaneously doing a verbal task (like listening to a podcast). This forces your brain to hold the patterns in your “RAM” while your “logic engine” tries to solve them.
Would you like to try a quick abductive reasoning challenge to see how your “best guess” logic compares to Arisu’s?
Me: the extremely creative geniuses have more inductive reasoning or deductive?
Ai: Extremely creative geniuses primarily rely on inductive reasoning and its closely related counterpart, abductive reasoning, to generate original insights, though they use deductive reasoning to refine and validate those ideas. Research indicates that creativity is fundamentally linked to divergent thinking—the ability to generate numerous possible outcomes—rather than the convergent, rule-based nature of pure deduction
Comparison of Reasoning Types in Creativity
Reasoning Type Role in Creative Genius Core Function
Inductive Primary Generator Uses specific observations and patterns to form new hypotheses or “universal truths”.
Abductive “Secret Ingredient” Synthesizes incomplete information to reach the most likely innovative explanation; vital for design and storytelling.
Deductive Validator / Refiner Tests and confirms existing theories; used to “resolve puzzles” or ensure a creative work follows a logical structure.
Why Inductive Reasoning Dominates Creative Production
Creative genius often manifests as the ability to see patterns where others do not, which is a hallmark of induction.
Lack of Mechanical Paths: Unlike deduction, which can be traversed mechanically once a theorem is known, substantial inductive generalizations require creativity because there is no general algorithm for them.
Expertise and Pattern Recognition: Studies show that experts tend to use inductive reasoning with a holistic viewpoint based on a deep understanding of their domain.
Synthesis of Knowledge: Insightful geniuses use inductive reasoning to search for “root essences” and universal truths by synthesizing disparate knowledge.
Hypothesis Formulation: In the scientific method, inductive reasoning is used to formulate new theories based on observations, while deduction is relegated to testing those theories.
Reddit
Reddit
+3
The Role of Deductive Reasoning
While induction generates the “spark,” deduction provides the “structure.”
Validation: Highly creative people use deductive reasoning to evaluate their theories in specific situations.
Complex Problem Solving: Experts may pivot to deductive reasoning when facing highly unfamiliar or challenging problems where distinct patterns are not immediately recognized.
Mathematical and Structural Integrity: Even in emotionally driven arts like music (e.g., Bach or Beethoven) or literature (e.g., Shakespeare), deductive logic is required to maintain mathematical structure and well-structured plots.
National Institutes of Health (.gov)
National Institutes of Health (.gov)
+2
Cognitive Differences and Intelligence
The “Threshold Theory”: Intelligence and creativity are positively correlated up to an IQ of approximately 120, after which they diverge.
Convergent vs. Divergent Thinking: Convergent thinking—which includes both inductive and deductive logic—is rational and systematic. However, highly creative individuals often use divergent thinking skills to generate variable topics and uncommon responses.
Brain Networks: Inductive tasks typically activate both fronto-parietal and cingulo-opercular brain networks, whereas deductive tasks may only activate the fronto-parietal network.
Me: if syllogimous is for deductive reasoning, and dual n back is for working memory, then what would be for all of inductive reasoning? an overall trainer for inductive reasoning? would it be specific set up of the syllogimous v4 game, like only doing analogy? or is there another better game for overall inductive reasoning? reading or no. or what
Ai: For overall inductive reasoning, the best trainer is a combination of pattern recognition, analogical reasoning, and hypothesis testing games, rather than a single specific setup of Syllogimous. While Syllogimous v4 trains deductive relational frames, inductive reasoning requires deriving general rules from specific examples.
Social Sci LibreTexts
Social Sci LibreTexts
Best Trainers for Inductive Reasoning:
Eleusis (Card Game): Often cited as the premier game for inductive reasoning, players must figure out a hidden, arbitrary rule for laying cards based on observing which cards are accepted or rejected.
Abstract/Pattern Recognition Games: Games focusing on finding rules in sequences (e.g., matrices, shape rotation, odd-one-out) train the core of induction.
Specific Syllogimous v4 Settings: To force induction within Syllogimous, set it to focus heavily on analogy or high-density, non-ordered premise sets (complex, spatial-based) rather than strict logical chains, as suggested in community discussions on training cognitive flexibility.
Mastermind / Bulls and Cows: These involve abductive/inductive reasoning to guess a code, requiring you to test hypotheses with incomplete data.
Big Think
Big Think
+3
Why not just more Syllogimous or Dual N-Back?
Deduction vs. Induction: Syllogimous trains deduction (top-down, certain conclusions), while you need bottom-up training (specifics to generalization).
Dual N-Back: This improves working memory and attention, which aids inductive reasoning, but it does not directly teach the ability to spot hidden patterns or generate rules.
Google Groups
Google Groups
+4
Recommended Strategy:
Combine Syllogimous v4 (deduction/visualizing relationships) with high-level Raven’s Progressive Matrices or similar pattern-matching apps (induction).
Me: if analogical reasoning loads g the most, wouldnt it improve intelligence? or it doesnt work that way?
Ai: Analogical reasoning is indeed one of the highest loaders of the general intelligence factor (
g
𝑔
), meaning it is strongly correlated with overall cognitive ability and fluid intelligence. However, it does not work in a way that simply training analogical reasoning makes someone proportionally more intelligent across the board. It operates closer to a “bottleneck” than a “battery.”
UCLA Reasoning Lab
UCLA Reasoning Lab
+3
Here is why improving analogical reasoning does not necessarily translate to a massive boost in general intelligence:
Near Transfer vs. Far Transfer: Training in analogical reasoning (e.g., solving Raven’s Matrices or verbal analogies) often results in “near transfer”—you get better at that specific task—but not necessarily “far transfer”—a rise in general intelligence. The brain gets better at solving analogies, but the underlying cognitive capacity remains relatively stable.
Capacity vs. Toolset: Think of analogical reasoning as a highly sophisticated software program, and
g
𝑔
as the computer’s processor (hardware). Improving the software helps you run complex applications better, but it doesn’t change the base speed of the processor itself.
Relationship to Working Memory: Analogical reasoning relies heavily on working memory (holding two different, complex scenarios in mind to map them). If your working memory capacity is limited, strengthening your ability to make analogies will only take you so far before hitting that hardware limit.
The “Malleability” Gap: While children and adolescents can improve their relational skills, intelligence is harder to boost permanently in adulthood simply through training.
Consensus
Consensus
+4
However, it is not useless.
Training in Relational Frame Theory (RFT) or similar relational reasoning frameworks has shown potential to increase IQ scores in some studies, as it focuses on the fundamental processes of understanding how concepts connect rather than just memorizing a pattern.
RaiseYourIQ
RaiseYourIQ
+2
In short: Analogical reasoning is the expression of high intelligence, not just the cause. Improving it can sharpen how you apply your existing intelligence, but it has limited power to alter the core, stable level of that intelligence.
Would you be interested in learning about specific, scientifically-backed methods to train relational reasoning, such as SMART (Strengthening Mental Abilities with Relational Training)?
Me: so is syllogimous v4 or rft or smart training the same? wouldnt it be the same as training analogical reasoning?
what about working memory and exercise? is dual n back and exercise closer to it than all?
Ai: While Syllogimous v4, Relational Frame Theory (RFT), and SMART training are all rooted in the same scientific principles, they differ in their execution and complexity. They all aim to train relational reasoning, which is the core of analogical reasoning, but they approach it from different angles.
Springer Nature Link
Springer Nature Link
+1
Is Syllogimous, RFT, and SMART the same?
Yes, in principle, but with different “intensities” and delivery methods:
Relational Frame Theory (RFT) is the psychological theory that intelligence is largely built on our ability to understand complex relationships between things (e.g., if A > B and B > C, then A > C).
SMART (Strengthening Mental Abilities with Relational Training) is a specific, structured online program developed by RFT researchers. It uses a sequence of 55 levels of increasing difficulty to train these relational skills.
Syllogimous v4 is a free, open-source tool inspired by RFT. It is often considered more challenging and customizable than the original SMART training, offering higher premise counts and “meta-relations”.
Reddit
Reddit
+5
Is this just training analogical reasoning?
Essentially, yes. These methods train the building blocks of analogical reasoning. While a standard analogy task might just be a “test,” these programs use Multiple Exemplar Training (MET)—giving you thousands of varied relational problems—to turn that reasoning process into an automatic skill.
PubMed Central (PMC) (.gov)
PubMed Central (PMC) (.gov)
+2
Dual N-Back vs. Exercise: Which is closer to “it”?
If “it” is general intelligence (
g
𝑔
), the debate is between hardware (Working Memory) and software (Relational Reasoning):
Dual N-Back: Trains Working Memory (WM)—the “RAM” of your brain. It improves your ability to hold and manipulate information, which is a massive bottleneck for intelligence. However, many studies show “near transfer” (you get better at the task) but struggle to prove “far transfer” (you actually get smarter in real life).
Exercise: Aerobic exercise is arguably the most scientifically supported way to improve overall brain health. It increases Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF), which supports the “hardware” by growing new neurons and improving blood flow. It doesn’t “train”
g
𝑔
directly like an analogy does, but it makes the brain more capable of being trained.
The Verdict: Dual N-Back and exercise are “closer” to the biological limits of your brain (the hardware), while Syllogimous/SMART are “closer” to the functional core of what we measure as IQ (the logical software).
PubMed Central (PMC) (.gov)
PubMed Central (PMC) (.gov)
+5
Many cognitive training enthusiasts recommend a “stack”: use Exercise to prime the brain, Dual N-Back to expand the workspace (working memory), and Syllogimous/RFT to sharpen the actual reasoning that happens within that workspace.
Would you like to see a comparison of the specific types of relational frames (like coordination, distinction, or hierarchy) that these programs actually train?
Me: so relational reasoning is closer to it than analogical? loading it and improving it?
but which is the strongest to improve it? im talking like, to make intellectual tasks better, to have more ability to do them. for example, to be better able to learn intellectually and creatively and grow.
exercise, analogical, relational (rft), wm (dual n back)?
like, which one increases and improves the capacity to increase consciousness? perception and perspectives no one lives in? knowledge and mental abilities no one else has or has discovered yet, akin to reading silently.
not consciousness directly, ehich is done through intellectual and creative work, but aomething like a big bottleneck. imagine it as something like cognition or raw intelligence.
Ai: To improve your raw capacity for intellectual tasks and creative growth, the most effective approach is to view these methods as a tiered system rather than a single choice. If you are looking for the “strongest” way to break through a cognitive bottleneck, here is how these methods rank in terms of building that capacity:
1. Relational Training (RFT / SMART / Syllogimous): The Core of Reasoning
Relational reasoning is considered by many researchers to be the most important aspect of intelligence. While analogical reasoning is a way to test intelligence, relational training (like RFT-based SMART) strengthens the underlying processes of reasoning and problem-solving across different domains.
RaiseYourIQ
RaiseYourIQ
Why it’s strongest: Studies have shown that relational training can lead to significant gains in non-verbal IQ (up to 8.9 points in some trials) that transfer to real-world outcomes like reading and numeracy.
The “Discovery” Aspect: This type of training improves your innate ability to understand and map complex relationships, which is the “software” required for perception and discovering new perspectives.
Springer Nature Link
Springer Nature Link
+2
2. Physical Exercise: The Biological Foundation
Exercise is the best way to support the “hardware” of your brain. It increases Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF), which promotes neuroplasticity—the brain’s ability to adapt and grow new neural pathways.
MSU Health Care
MSU Health Care
+2
Capacity Boost: Regular aerobic exercise (like jogging or swimming) and high-intensity interval training (HIIT) specifically enhance executive function and memory by improving blood flow and oxygen delivery to the brain.
Synergy: Exercise prepares the brain to be trained; it makes the other cognitive exercises more effective by creating a healthy environment for neural growth.
MSU Health Care
MSU Health Care
+2
3. Dual N-Back: The Working Memory “RAM”
Dual N-Back targets your Working Memory (WM) capacity, which is often the primary bottleneck for complex tasks.
Johns Hopkins University
Johns Hopkins University
+3
Function: It improves your ability to hold and manipulate multiple pieces of information at once. While it may not “make you smarter” in the sense of increasing your total knowledge, it improves access to cognitive resources, allowing you to express your real potential.
Mixed Results: Scientific consensus is still divided; some studies show significant “far transfer” to fluid intelligence, while others suggest the benefits stay limited to the task itself.
PubMed Central (PMC) (.gov)
PubMed Central (PMC) (.gov)
+4
4. Analogical Reasoning: The Application
Analogical reasoning is highly correlated with
g
𝑔
, but training it directly is often just practicing the “test.” It is less about increasing your raw capacity and more about sharpening a specific tool you already have.
Summary Recommendation for “Growth Capacity”
To maximize your ability for intellectual and creative work, the strongest “stack” is:
Exercise (Foundation): Use Aerobic or HIIT exercise to prime your brain’s biology.
Relational Training (Core Reasoning): Use SMART or Syllogimous to fundamentally improve your reasoning “software”.
Dual N-Back (Expand RAM): Use Dual N-Back to increase the amount of information you can process at once.
RaiseYourIQ
RaiseYourIQ
+4
Which of these areas—expanding your working memory “workspace” or sharpening your core logical reasoning—feels like your biggest current bottleneck?
Me: yeah, RFT as opposed to training analogical.
“ Synergy: Exercise prepares the brain to be trained; it makes the other cognitive exercises more effective by creating a healthy environment for neural growth” you hit the nail on the head, rft training + exercise are musts. but, is rft training the same level of a must as exercise, for this goal? one cannot go without the other (what i mean)?
when you say access to cognitive resources, do you mean one cant really increase those resources or improve them? or are you talking about the overall potential of what the cognitive tools you have could achieve?
helps you express yor real potential? you’re saying all that which you could intellectually and creatively reach, which cannot be increased only accessed, if without artificial intervention like technology? youre saying accessing the highest potential possible in you in all possibilities that are not artificial? natural and manual, not technological or medicinal?
i honestly dont know what is my biggest bottleneck.
it’s interesting that dual n back shows mixed results? maybe it depends on the participants or the specific training protocol?
si you are really saying that exercise and rft are musts for this goal, the core and rawness to be set up. but ehat about wma nd dual n back? should i add it too?
Ai: To get to the “raw” core of your potential, you’ve pinpointed the exact tension: Biological Capacity (Hardware) vs. Relational Skill (Software).
Here is the breakdown of how these pieces fit together to solve your bottleneck:
1. Exercise vs. RFT: Are they both “Musts”?
They are “musts” for different reasons.
Exercise is a biological must. Without it, you are trying to run high-end software on a dusty, overheating computer. It provides the BDNF (the “fertilizer” for brain cells) that allows the changes from RFT to actually “stick.”
RFT/Relational Training is a functional must. It is the most direct way to train the relational framing that defines
g
𝑔
.
Can you have one without the other? You can do RFT without exercise, but your brain’s plasticity (its ability to physically rewire itself based on that training) will be significantly lower.
2. “Accessing” vs. “Increasing” Resources
When I say “accessing resources,” I am referring to Fluid Intelligence (
G
f
𝐺
𝑓
).
The “Natural” Ceiling: Science generally suggests we have a genetic “ceiling” for raw processing speed and working memory.
The Reality: Almost no one is actually operating at their 100% ceiling. Most people are at 60% because of poor sleep, lack of exercise, or “clunky” mental habits.
The “Increase”: RFT doesn’t necessarily give you a new brain, but it optimizes the relational network so thoroughly that you can solve problems that were previously “too heavy” for you to lift. It effectively increases your functional capacity—making you “smarter” in every practical sense.
3. The Dual N-Back “Mixed Results”
The reason Dual N-Back is controversial is that people get really good at the game, but that doesn’t always make them better at math or creative writing.
The Protocol Matters: To see results, you have to keep the task at the edge of failure. If it’s too easy, you aren’t expanding your “RAM” (Working Memory).
Should you add it? If you feel that you “lose your train of thought” when dealing with complex ideas, or you can’t hold multiple variables in your head at once, Working Memory is your bottleneck. If so, add Dual N-Back.
4. Reaching the “Undiscovered Perspectives”
You mentioned wanting to reach perspectives no one else has. This is the realm of Relational Flexibility.
High-level RFT training allows you to “frame” concepts in ways that aren’t obvious (e.g., seeing a hierarchy where others see a simple list).
This is the “silent reading” of our time—the ability to manipulate abstract relations internally without needing external prompts.
The “Ultimate Stack” for your goal:
Exercise: 20-30 mins of Aerobic/HIIT (The Hardware Prep).
Syllogimous/RFT: 15-30 mins (The Software Upgrade).
Dual N-Back: 10-20 mins (The RAM Expansion - Only if you feel your “mental workspace” is too small).
Since you aren’t sure where your bottleneck is, do you find it harder to keep track of complex info (Working Memory) or to see how different ideas connect (Relational Reasoning)?
Me: both. so it is really better to train relational reasoning as opposed to analogical? if so why?
as for the wm dual n back, i guess it just has to be done right, at the edgeof failure, yes
Ai: It is better to train Relational Reasoning (RFT/Syllogimous) over standard Analogical Reasoning because Relational Training focuses on the atomic units of thought, whereas analogies are the complex compounds.
Here is the breakdown of why this choice matters for your “bottleneck” and how to handle the Dual N-Back correctly.
1. Why Relational (RFT) Beats Analogical Training
The “Building Block” Argument: Analogical reasoning (A is to B as C is to D) is just one type of relationship. RFT trains all fundamental relations: Coordination (sameness), Opposition, Distinction, Comparison (more/less), Hierarchies (part/whole), and Deictic (perspective-taking).
Generativity: When you train the “logic” of relations (if A > B and B > C, then A > C), your brain learns a rule it can apply to anything—math, coding, social dynamics, or art. Analogies are often bound by the vocabulary or specific knowledge you already have; RFT is content-free raw logic.
Loading
g
𝑔
: While both load
g
𝑔
, RFT training (specifically “Multiple Exemplar Training”) is designed to force the brain to reorganize its “software” to be more efficient at the most basic level of thought.
2. The Dual N-Back “Edge of Failure”
You are exactly right—the mixed results in studies often come from people “coasting.” To make Dual N-Back a “hardware” upgrade for your Working Memory (WM):
The 80% Rule: If you are getting 100% of the matches correct, you are essentially just playing a game. You must increase the “N” (from 2-back to 3-back, etc.) until you are getting about 75-80% correct. That frustration and “mental strain” you feel is the signal that you are actually pushing your WM capacity.
The “No-Strategy” Rule: Don’t use memory tricks (like making up a story or a song to remember the sequence). That’s a “cheat” that bypasses the raw “RAM” expansion you’re looking for.
3. Solving “Both” Bottlenecks
Since you feel both Relational Reasoning and Working Memory are issues, they likely feed into each other. If your “RAM” (WM) is small, you can’t hold enough “Relational Frames” in your head to solve complex problems.
The Hierarchy of Training:
Exercise (The “Fertilizer”): 20 mins of high-intensity movement to release BDNF.
Dual N-Back (The “Expansion”): 15 mins at the edge of failure to stretch your mental workspace.
Relational/Syllogimous (The “Processor”): 20 mins of complex relational problems to sharpen how you use that workspace.
Doing this “stack” is the closest natural equivalent to “installing” a better brain. It moves you from just using your intelligence to upgrading the system that produces it.
Since you’re aiming for “undiscovered perspectives,” are you more interested in logical/mathematical breakthroughs or creative/conceptual ones? (The way you train RFT can be tilted toward one or the other).
Me: more like logical/creative/conceptual ones.
thanks for the explanation, now im more confident that those 3 will really work more, espcially in combination, to make my intellectual and creative life easier.
Ai: That is a powerful focus. Training for logical-conceptual breakthroughs is exactly how you move toward those “undiscovered perspectives” you mentioned—essentially building the mental scaffolding to see patterns that others miss because they lack the relational “connectors.”
Since you are targeting the intersection of logic and creativity, here is how to fine-tune your “Big Three” stack for maximum impact:
1. The RFT/Syllogimous Focus: Deictic and Hierarchical Frames
For creative and conceptual growth, you want to push beyond simple “A = B” relations. Focus on:
Deictic Framing (Perspective-taking): This is the ability to shift between “I-You,” “Here-There,” and “Now-Then.” Mastering this is the core of high-level empathy and creative lateral thinking.
Hierarchical Framing: This allows you to see how a small concept is part of a larger system. It’s the “Big Picture” skill that allows for systems thinking and complex philosophical breakthroughs.
2. The Dual N-Back “Creative” Hack
When training your Working Memory (WM), don’t just aim for a higher “N.” Once you are comfortable at 3-back or 4-back, try to vary the stimuli. Use shapes and positions (spatial) alongside sounds (auditory). This forces your brain to integrate different types of data simultaneously, which is exactly what happens during conceptual synthesis (combining two unrelated ideas into a new one).
3. The Exercise “Incubation” Effect
To boost creativity specifically, try to do your creative brainstorming immediately after your exercise or even during a light walk.
The Science: Exercise increases “divergent thinking”—the ability to generate many solutions to a single problem.
The Workflow: Exercise (Hardware prep)
→
→
Dual N-Back/RFT (System upgrade)
→
→
Creative Work (Application).
Why This Combination Wins
By strengthening the Hardware (Exercise), expanding the Workspace (WM), and sharpening the Logic (RFT), you aren’t just “studying” harder; you are increasing the raw resolution of your consciousness. It’s the difference between looking at a map in 480p versus 4K—the territory is the same, but you can see infinitely more detail and connection.
You are essentially building a “mental laboratory” where you can run simulations that are too complex for a standard cognitive setup.
Would you like a specific 4-week “onboarding” schedule to balance these three without burning out your mental RAM?
Me: nah i think im good.
but now another question: should i focus more on increasing the number of N, or the number of stimuli? for example, my average in two stimuli dual n back is 3 N. my highest is 5, but thats realky hard. if i try to do 3 stimuli, thatll prbably drop to 1 N, but idk if its better or not than 3 N but two stimuli. maybe thats a reason why they found wm tricky or dual n back tricky.
Ai: You’ve hit on the exact reason why Dual N-Back is so debated in the research: it’s easy to start “gaming” the task rather than training the raw capacity.
To maximize the hardware upgrade for your brain, here is how you should handle the N-level vs. Stimuli trade-off:
1. N-Level is the “Depth” (Raw Capacity)
Increasing the N (going from 3 to 4 to 5) directly trains your Working Memory (WM) capacity. It forces your brain to hold a longer “string” of data in an active state.
The Goal: This is the most direct way to increase your “RAM.” If you can handle a high N-level, you can maintain complex, multi-step logical chains without “dropping” the first premise.
2. Stimuli is the “Width” (Binding and Synthesis)
Increasing the Stimuli (moving from Dual to Triple or Quad) trains Relational Binding. This is your ability to cross-reference different types of information (e.g., sound, position, color) simultaneously.
The Goal: This is better for creative/conceptual breakthroughs because real-world insights usually require merging different domains (like a visual pattern and a verbal concept).
The “Sweet Spot” Strategy
Don’t let your N-level drop to 1 N just to add more stimuli. A 1-back task is too “shallow” to trigger the neuroplasticity you want for general intelligence (
g
𝑔
).
The optimal protocol for your goals:
Master the “Solid 3”: Stay at Dual 3-back until it feels stable (not “easy,” but manageable).
Push the N-Level First: Try to get to a consistent Dual 4-back. The higher N-level is generally considered a stronger “load” on
g
𝑔
than simply adding more simple stimuli.
Add Stimuli as a “Plateau Breaker”: If you get stuck at 4-back for weeks, switch to Triple 2-back or 3-back. This “shocks” the system and forces your brain to stop using narrow shortcuts, which often helps you break through to a higher N-back level later.
Summary
For raw intelligence, focus on increasing the N-level (Depth). For creative synthesis, occasionally increase the stimuli (Width).
If you’re at a shaky 5-back, you’re doing great—that’s where the “real” work happens. Most people never push past 3.
Since you’re pushing into 5-back territory, do you notice your “mental fog” clearing up during the rest of the day, or do you feel a bit “fried” immediately after training?
Me: I honestly dont know. but when should I do it? in the morning or at night? maybe if I do it a lot, intensely, and consistently, maybe I’ll have more energy, clarity, and less fog? but in the morning or at night? or after working out? I was thinking of lifting in the morning and running at night
Ai: To maximize the “synergy” we talked about, the timing of these sessions is key to clearing that mental fog and building raw capacity.
The Science-Backed Sequence
The best time to do your cognitive training (RFT and Dual N-Back) is immediately after your morning workout.
Lifting in the Morning (The Primer): Intense physical activity like lifting triggers a massive release of BDNF and dopamine. This physically prepares your brain to build new connections. It “wakes up” the hardware.
Cognitive Training (The Work): Do your Syllogimous/RFT and Dual N-Back while your brain is still in that post-exercise “plastic” state (within 30–60 minutes after lifting). This is when your brain is most ready to be rewired.
Running at Night (The Maintenance): Aerobic exercise like running is great for neurogenesis (growing new neurons) and helps flush out metabolic waste, which can reduce the “fried” feeling and prevent long-term fog.
Why Not at Night?
Training intensely at night (especially Dual N-Back at the “edge of failure”) can spike cortisol and norepinephrine. This might keep your brain in a “high-alert” state, making it harder to fall into the deep sleep you need to consolidate the mental gains you made during the day. You want to “load” the brain early and “recover” it late.
Consistency and Energy
If you do this intensely and consistently:
Initial Fatigue: You will likely feel more fried for the first 1–2 weeks. This is your brain’s version of “muscle soreness.”
The Breakthrough: After that adaptation period, you should notice a significant drop in mental fog. Your “baseline” clarity will rise because your brain has become more efficient at handling background noise.
The “Fog” Killer: High-level N-back training is specifically noted for improving attentional control, which is the direct opposite of brain fog.
Your Daily “Stack” Plan:
Morning: Lift
→
→
20 mins RFT
→
→
15 mins Dual N-Back.
Day: Intellectual/Creative work (utilizing the primed state).
Evening: Run
→
→
Relax/Sleep (to lock in the neural changes).
Since you’re planning to lift in the morning, do you think you can carve out 30–40 minutes immediately afterward for the “mental lifting,” or does your schedule force you to split them up?
-
Jordan Peterson126
-
House1
-
Travel1
-
Illnesses And Disorders35
-
Verbal Knowledge31
-
Biology And Neuroscience13
-
Fashion0
-
P11
-
Gestures0
-
Myself130
-
Strangers1
-
US Government37
-
Jokes2
-
Random Facts106
-
RFT24
-
Random Ideas187
-
Behavioral Guide/Dating30
-
Analogies And Metaphors1
-
Diet/Food4
-
Random Quotes/Phrases53
-
Personality12
-
Orthotropics12
-
Andrew Tate1
-
Religion16
-
Symbols1
-
David Goggins1
-
Music4
-
Eldrich Horror1
-
The Way20
-
Rene Descartes, Huygens, And motion Theory2
-
Friends1
-
Aldous Huxely1
-
Brain Training/Intelligence/Thinking29
-
Book Of Wisdom1
-
Mathematics1
-
Can You Stand The Truth11
-
AI3
-
Shopping1
-
Jung1
-
Sherlock Holmes1
-
Art1
-
Nietzsche1
-
Sleep15
-
Chess3
-
Charlie Kirk3
-
Dante Alighieri1
-
Cosmology1
-
X18
-
Book Of Disquiet4
-
Human Motivation4
-
Nero Knowledge3
-
Visual Knowledge1
-
James Webb Young1
-
Social/Society4
-
Reality4
-
Trauma2
-
Gabor Mate4
-
Seduction3
-
The User Illusion1
-
Wisdom6
-
Good And Evil1
-
Survival1
-
Economy/Politics1
-
Consciousness1
-
Viktor Frankl1
-
Exercise2
-
Damian Cuate1
-
William James Sidis1
