Investigating the impact of a prevention technique or intervention on the level of subsequent crime, fear, or other intended outcome is referred to as:
evaluation
Ekblom and Pease argue that the goals of evaluation include all but which of the following?
understanding who had the most impact on a project
Another name for an impact evaluation is:
outcome evaluation
The fact that neighborhoods or other geographic areas are often targeted in prevention raises all but which of the following problems?
all of the above are problems
The largest problem with a cost-benefit analysis is:
setting monetary values on all factors
Which of the following is NOT a reason for an atheoretical evaluation?
an evaluation has already been conducted
Which of the following is NOT an advantage of a true experimental design?
costs can be assessed
The taking of measurements in the study that cause change to occur in place of or beyond the impact of the stimulus refers to the problem of:
testing
Something that takes place independent of the experiment and causes the change to take place refers to:
history
Which of the following is NOT a threat to external validity listed by Tilley?
selection
The underlying problem for external validity is that, too often, experimental designs fail to consider the __________.
context of the program
The negative findings in an evaluation may be the result of all but which of the following?
none of the above
Impact evaluations consider the implementation of a program or initiative and involve determining the procedures used to implement a specific program (TF)
false
The fact that crime prevention initiatives rarely rely on a single intervention or approach is an advantage in conducting evaluations (TF)
false
Process evaluations offer a detailed descriptive account of the program and its implementation (TF)
true
Cost-benefit analysis is a form of process evaluation that requires that an impact evaluation be completed at the same time (TF)
true
Self-report data is a response to evaluations of crime prevention programs on neighborhoods or other small geographic areas that do not coincide with specific police reporting areas (TF)
true
The ideal follow-up time for evaluation is 6 months (TF)
false
A true experimental design is also known as a randomized control trial (TF)
true
Threats to internal validity are factors that could cause the results other than the measures that were implemented (TF)
true
The issue of generalizability involves what are called threats to internal validity (TF)
false
Intensity of intervention in relation to target people, places of crime problems varies from site to site, and the level refers to the external validity problem of intervenor attributes (TF)
false
In realistic evaluation, rather than relying exclusively on experimental approaches, evaluation needs to observe the phenomenon in its entirety (TF)
true