Ch. 5 Flashcards

(54 cards)

1
Q

Learning Objectives

A

5-1
Explain how memory is both a general term for storage and also an umbrella term for many cognitive processes.
5-2
Describe how short-term and working memory and similar and how they are different.
5-3
Explain why we can remember a telephone number long enough to place a call but tend to forget it almost immediately afterward.
5-4
Describe the capacity of short-term memory in terms of time and amount of information.
5-5
Explain how the process of chunking can improve short-term memory capacity.
5-6
Describe how memory is involved in processes such as doing a math problem.
5-7
Evaluate whether we use the same memory system to remember things we have seen and things we have heard.
5-8
Evaluate the working memory model and its components, including the central executive, phonological loop, and visuospatial sketch pad.
5-9
Describe how the prefrontal cortex relates to brief-duration memory systems.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Memory

A

The processes involved in retaining, retrieving, and using information about stimuli, images, events, ideas, and skills after the original information is no longer present

Memory has to do with the past affecting the present and the future.

The word “remember” can be divided into re, indicating repetition, and member, indicating a part or element. Together, to remember implies a “bringing back” or recollection of the elements or parts of a whole memory. In other words, to remember is to re-assemble.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what are the purpose of sensory memory

A

is important when we watch movies (more on that soon).

However, the main reason for discussing sensory memory is to demonstrate an ingenious procedure for measuring how much information we can take in immediately and how much of that information remains half a second later

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what are the purposes of short term memory

A

Everything you know or think about at each moment in time is in short-term memory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

The Modal Model of Memory

A

The model proposed by Atkinson and Shiffrin that describes memory as a mechanism that involves processing information through a series of stages, including short-term memory and long-term memory.

It is called the modal model because it contained features of many models that were being proposed in the 1960s.

This model proposed three types of memory:

  1. Sensory memory is an initial stage that holds all incoming information for seconds or fractions of a second.
  2. Short-term memory (STM) holds five to seven items for about 15 to 20 seconds.
  3. Long-term memory (LTM) can hold a large amount of information for years, with some lasting as long as you live.

components of memory do not act in isolation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

structural features

A

Types of memory indicated by boxes in models of memory. In the modal model, the types are sensory memory, short-term memory, and long-term memory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

control processes

A

In Atkinson and Shiffrin’s modal model of memory, active processes that can be controlled by the person and that may differ from one task to another. (They are dynamic)

Rehearsal is an example of a control process.

Other examples of control processes are

(1)
strategies you might use to help make a stimulus more memorable, such as relating the digits in a phone number to a familiar date in history, and

(2)
strategies of attention that help you focus on information that is particularly important or interesting.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

rehearsal

A

The process of repeating a stimulus over and over, usually for the purpose of remembering it, that keeps the stimulus active in short-term memory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Encoding

A

The process of storming info in LTM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Retrieval

A

This process of remembering information that is stored in long-term memory is called retrieval

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Sensory Memory

A

A brief stage of memory that holds information for seconds or fractions of a second. It is the first stage in the modal model of memory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Persistence of vision

A

The continued perception of light for a fraction of a second after the original light stimulus has been extinguished. Perceiving a trail of light from a moving sparkler is caused by the persistence of vision.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

whole report method

A

Procedure used in Sperling’s experiment on the properties of the visual icon, in which participants were instructed to report all of the stimuli they saw in a brief presentation.

participants saw only an average of 4.5 of the 12 letters (38 percent of the total number of letters were remembered).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

partial report method

A

Procedure used in Sperling’s experiment on the properties of the visual icon, in which participants were instructed to report only some of the stimuli in a briefly presented display.

A cue tone immediately after the display was extinguished indicated which part of the display to report.

A high-pitched tone indicated the top row; a medium-pitch indicated the middle row; and a low-pitch indicated the bottom row.

Because the tones were presented immediately after the letters were turned off, the participant’s attention was directed not to the actual letters, which were no longer present, but to whatever trace remained in the participant’s mind after the letters were turned.

When the participants focused their attention on one of the rows, they correctly reported an average of about 3.3 of the 4 letters (82 percent) in that row.

Because this occurred no matter which row they were reporting, Sperling concluded that immediately after the 12-letter display was presented, participants saw an average of 82 percent of all the letters but were not able to report all these letters because they rapidly faded as the initial letters were being reported

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

delayed partial report method

A

Procedure used in Sperling’s experiment on the properties of the visual icon, in which participants were instructed to report only some of the stimuli in a briefly presented display.

A cue tone that was delayed for a fraction of a second after the display was extinguished indicated which part of the display to report.

to determine the time course of the fading.

The result of the delayed partial report experiments was that when the cue tones were delayed for 1 second after the flash, participants were able to report only slightly more than one letter in a row.

plots this result, showing the percentage of letters available to the participants from the entire display as a function of time following the presentation of the display.

This graph indicates that immediately after a stimulus is presented, all or most of the stimulus is available for perception.

This is sensory memory.

Then, over the next second, sensory memory fades

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

decays

A

Process by which information is lost from memory due to the passage of time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

iconic memory or the visual icon

A

Brief sensory memory for visual stimuli that lasts for a fraction of a second after a stimulus is extinguished.

This corresponds to the sensory memory stage of the modal model of memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

echoic memory

A

Brief sensory memory for auditory stimuli that lasts for a few seconds after a stimulus is extinguished.

Also called the persistence of sound

An example of echoic memory is when you hear someone say something that you fail to understand at first and say “What?” But even before the person can repeat what was said, you “hear” (comprehend) it in your mind.

If that has happened to you, you have experienced echoic memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Short-term memory (STM)

A

A memory mechanism that can hold a limited amount of information for a brief period of time, usually around 30 seconds, unless there is rehearsal (such as repeating a telephone number) to maintain the information in short-term memory.

Short-term memory is one of the stages in the modal model of memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

early research on STM that focused on answering the following two questions:

A

(1)
What is the duration of STM?

(2)
What is the capacity of STM?

These questions were answered in experiments that used the method of recall to test memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

recall

A

Subjects are asked to report stimuli they have previously seen or heard.

Memory performance can be measured as a percentage of the stimuli that are remembered.

Participants’ responses can also be analyzed to determine whether there is a pattern to the way items are recalled.

(For example, if participants are given a list consisting of types of fruits and models of cars, their recall can be analyzed to determine whether they grouped cars together and fruits together as they were recalling them.)

Recall is also involved when a person is asked to recollect life events, such as graduating from high school, or to recall facts they have learned, such as the capital of Argentina.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What Is the Duration of Short-Term Memory?

A

15 - 20 seconds

23
Q

Brown Peterson task

A

1958

presented participants with three random letters, such as FZL or BHM, followed by a random number, such as 403.

Participants were instructed to begin counting backward by threes from that number.

This was done to keep participants from rehearsing the letters.

After intervals ranging from 3 to 18 seconds, participants were asked to recall the three letters.

Participants correctly recalled about 80 percent of the three-letter groups when they had counted for only 3 seconds but recalled only about 12 percent of the groups after counting for 18 seconds.

Results such as this have led to the conclusion that the effective duration of STM (when rehearsal is prevented, as occurred when counting backward) is about 15 to 20 seconds or less.

information lost rapidly from STM

24
Q

Digit span task

A

The number of digits a person can remember.

Digit span is used as a measure of the capacity of short-term memory.

According to measurements of digit span, the average capacity of STM is about five to nine items—about the length of a phone number.

This idea that the limit of STM is somewhere between five and nine was suggested by George Miller (1956), who summarized the evidence for this limit in his paper “The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two

25
How Many Items Can Be Held in Short-Term Memory?
According to measurements of digit span, the average capacity of STM is about five to nine items. Luck and Vogel concluded that participants were able to retain about four items in STM. Thus, chunking in terms of meaning increases our ability to hold information in STM. increases the memory span to 20 words or more
26
Change detection
Detecting differences between pictures or displays that are presented one after another. More recent measures of STM capacity have set the limit at about four items (Cowan, 2001). This conclusion is based on the results of experiments like one by Steven Luck and Edward Vogel (1997), which measured the capacity of STM by using a procedure called change detection . The result of Luck and Vogel’s experiment, indicates that performance was almost perfect when there were one to three squares in the arrays, but that performance began decreasing when there were four or more squares. Luck and Vogel concluded that participants were able to retain about four items in STM. Other experiments, using verbal materials, have come to the same conclusion (Cowan, 2001).
27
Chunking
Combining small units into larger ones, such as when individual words are combined into a meaningful sentence. Chunking can be used to increase the capacity of memory. These 7 or 4 item estimates set rather low limits on the capacity of STM. If our ability to hold items in memory is so limited, how is it possible to hold many more items in memory in some situations, such as when words are arranged in a sentence? = chunking Thus, chunking in terms of meaning increases our ability to hold information in STM. increases the memory span to 20 words or more.
28
Chunk
Used in connection with the idea of chunking in memory. A chunk is a collection of elements that are strongly associated with each other but weakly associated with elements in other chunks.
29
mnemonics
Any memory strategy or technique that improves encoding, retention, and/or retrieval of information. Story mnemonic: put random words into a meaningful order within a story that can then be more easily remembered.
30
How Much Information Can Be Held in Short-Term Memory?
Some researchers have suggested that rather than describing memory capacity in terms of “number of items,” it should be described in terms of “amount of information.” When referring to visual objects, information has been defined as visual features or details of the object that are stored in memory. The results, was that participants’ ability to make the same/different judgment depended on the complexity of the stimuli.
31
George Alvarez and Patrick Cavanagh (2004)
did an experiment using Luck and Vogel’s change detection procedure. But in addition to colored squares, they also used more complex objects like the ones. For ex, shaded cubes, which were the most complex stimuli, a participant would see a display containing several different cubes, followed by a blank interval, followed by a display that was either the same as the first one or in which one of the cubes was different. The participant’s task was to indicate whether the two displays were the same or different. The results, was that participants’ ability to make the same/different judgment depended on the complexity of the stimuli. Memory capacity for the colored squares was 4.4, but the capacity for the cubes was only 1.6. Based on this result, Alvarez and Cavanagh concluded that the greater the amount of information in an image, the fewer items that can be held in visual STM.
32
Sabrina Trapp and colleagues (2021)
suggest that the capacity for STM may serve a functional purpose: to help us predict future sensory input. This means our leaky bucket likely leaks on purpose at least!
33
Working memory (WM)
A limited-capacity system for temporary storage and manipulation of information for complex tasks such as comprehension, learning, and reasoning. introduced in a paper by Baddeley and Hitch (1974). STM is concerned mainly with storing information for a brief period (for example, remembering a phone number), whereas WM is concerned with the manipulation of information that occurs during complex cognition. holding information in memory and processing information. The fact that STM and the modal model do not consider dynamic processes that unfold over time is what led Baddeley and Hitch to propose that the name working memory, rather than short-term memory, be used for the STM process.
34
Baddeley and Hitch (1974).
Baddeley, one of the things he noticed was that under certain conditions it is possible to carry out two tasks simultaneously. According to Atkinson and Shiffrin’s modal model, it should only be possible to perform one of these tasks, which should occupy the entire STM. found participants were able to read while simultaneously remembering numbers. What kind of model can take into account both (1) the dynamic processes involved in cognitions such as understanding language and doing math problems and (2) the fact that people can carry out two tasks simultaneously? Baddeley concluded that working memory must be dynamic and must also consist of several components that can function separately. He proposed three components: the phonological loop, the visuospatial sketch pad, and the central executive
35
model of working memory
three main components of Baddeley and Hitch’s (1974; Baddeley, 2000) model of working memory: the phonological loop, the visuospatial sketch pad, and the central executive.
36
phonological loop
The part of working memory that holds and processes verbal and auditory information. consists of two components: the phonological store , which has a limited capacity and holds information for only a few seconds, and the articulatory rehearsal process , which is responsible for rehearsal that can keep items in the phonological store from decaying. Thus, when you are trying to remember a telephone number or a person’s name you are using your phonological loop.
37
visuospatial sketch pad
The part of working memory that holds and processes visual and spatial information. When you form a picture in your mind or do tasks like solving a puzzle or finding your way around campus, you are using your visuospatial sketch pad. The phonological loop and the visuospatial sketch pad are attached to the central executive. The visuospatial sketch pad handles visual and spatial information and is therefore involved in the process of visual imagery.
38
central executive
The part of working memory that coordinates the activity of the phonological loop and the visuospatial sketch pad. The “traffic cop” of the working memory system. where the major work of working memory occurs. The central executive pulls information from LTM and coordinates the activity of the phonological loop and visuospatial sketch pad by focusing on specific parts of a task and deciding how to divide attention between different tasks. The central executive is therefore the “traffic patrol” of the working memory system. To understand this “traffic patrol” function, imagine you are driving in a strange city, a friend in the passenger seat is reading you directions to a restaurant, and the car radio is playing music in the background. Your phonological loop is taking in the verbal directions from your friend; your sketch pad is helping you visualize a map of the streets leading to the restaurant; and your central executive is coordinating and combining these two kinds of information. In addition, the central executive might be helping you ignore the lyrics from the music on the radio so you can focus your attention on the directions.
39
three phenomena that support the idea of a system specialized for language
the phonological similarity effect, the word length effect, and articulatory suppression.
40
phonological similarity effect
An effect that occurs when letters or words that sound similar are confused. For example, T and P are two similar-sounding letters that could be confused. R. Conrad (1964) flashed a series of target letters on a screen and instructed his participants to write down the letters in the order they were presented. He found that when participants made errors, they were most likely to misidentify the target letter as another letter that sounded like the target. Thus, even though the participants saw the letters, the mistakes they made were based on the letters’ sounds.
41
word length effect
The notion that it is more difficult to remember a list of long words than a list of short words. Each list contains eight words, but according to the word length effect, the second list will be more difficult to remember because it takes more time to pronounce and rehearse longer words and to produce them during recall (Baddeley et al., 1984). In another study of memory for verbal material, Baddeley and colleagues (1975) found that people can remember the number of items that they can pronounce in about 1.5 to 2.0 seconds. Try counting out loud, as fast as you can, for 2 seconds. According to Baddeley, the number of words you can say should be close to your digit span.
42
articulatory suppression
Interference with operation of the phonological loop that occurs when a person repeats an irrelevant word such as “the” while carrying out a task that requires the phonological loop. Another way that the operation of the phonological loop has been studied is by determining what happens when its operation is disrupted. Baddeley and colleagues (1984) found that repeating “the, the, the . . .” not only reduces the ability to remember a list of words but also eliminates the word length effect. Eliminating rehearsal by saying “the, the, the . . .” removes this advantage for short words, so both short and long words are lost from the phonological store.
43
visual imagery
A type of mental imagery involving vision, in which an image is experienced in the absence of a visual stimulus. early visual imagery experiment by Roger Shepard and Jacqueline Metzler (1971). measured participants’ reaction time to decide whether pairs of objects were the same or different, they obtained the relationship for when objects that were the same. when one shape was rotated 40 degrees compared to the other shape, it took 2 seconds to decide that a pair was the same shape. However, for a greater difference caused by a rotation of 140 degrees it took 4 seconds. Based on this finding that reaction times were longer for greater differences in orientation, Shepard and Metzler inferred that participants were solving the problem by rotating an image of one of the objects in their mind, a phenomenon called mental rotation. This mental rotation is an example of the operation of the visuospatial sketch pad because it involves visual rotation through space.
44
Lee Brooks (1968)
Just as the operation of the phonological loop is disrupted by interference (articulatory suppression), so is the visuospatial sketch pad. Which was easier, pointing to “Out” or “In” or saying “Out” or “In”? Most people find that the pointing task is more difficult. The reason is that holding the image of the letter and pointing are both visuospatial tasks, so the visuospatial sketch pad becomes overloaded. In contrast, saying “Out” or “In” is an articulatory task that is handled by the phonological loop, so speaking typically does not interfere with visualizing the F.
45
The Central Executive
The central executive is the component that makes working memory “work,” because it is the control center of the working memory system. Its mission is not to store information but to coordinate how information is used by the phonological loop and visuospatial sketch pad. Baddeley describes the central executive as being an attention controller. It determines how attention is focused on a specific task, how it is divided between two tasks, and how it is switched between tasks. The central executive is therefore related to executive attention. The central executive is essential in situations such as when a person is attempting to simultaneously drive and talk on the phone. One of the ways the central executive has been studied is by assessing the behavior of patients with injury to the brain. the frontal lobe plays a central role in working memory. It is logical, therefore, that patients with damage to the frontal lobe have problems controlling their attention. A typical behavior of patients with frontal lobe damage is perseveration —repeatedly performing the same action or thought even if it is not achieving the desired goal.
46
An Added Component: The Episodic Buffer
Baddeley’s three-component model cannot explain some things. A component added to Baddeley’s original working memory model that serves as a “backup” store that communicates with both long-term memory and the components of working memory. It holds information longer and has greater capacity than the phonological loop or visuospatial sketch pad. Can store information (thereby providing extra capacity) and is connected to LTM (thereby making interchange between working memory and LTM possible). Model also shows that the visuospatial sketch pad and phonological loop are linked to LTM. This revised model shows connections to three types: - The phonological loop is connected to language-related LTM, including definitions, grammar, syntax (word order), and phonology (how languages sound). - The episodic buffer is connected to episodic LTM, or the memories of our conscious experiences. - The visuospatial sketch pad is connected to visual semantics, a type of LTM related to the meaning derived from visual information.
47
The Effect of Damage to the Prefrontal Cortex
Phineas Gage and the tamping rod. Amazingly, Gage survived, but reports from the time noted that the accident had changed Gage’s personality from an upstanding citizen to a person with low impulse control, poor ability to plan, and poor social skills. Nonetheless, reports about Gage, whether accurate or not, gave rise to the idea that the frontal lobes are involved in a variety of mental functions, including personality and planning.
48
delayed-response task
A task in which information is provided, a delay is imposed, and then memory is tested. This task has been used to study short-term memory by testing monkeys’ ability to hold information about the location of a food reward during a delay. If their PFC is removed, their performance drops to chance level (50/50), so they pick the correct food well only about half of the time. This result supports the idea that the PFC is important for holding information for brief periods. In fact, it has been suggested that one reason we can describe the memory behavior of very young infants as “out of sight, out of mind” (when an object that the infant can see is then hidden from view, the infant behaves as if the object no longer exists) is that their frontal and prefrontal cortex do not become adequately developed until about 8 months of age
49
Prefrontal Neurons That Hold Information
Shintaro Funahashi and colleagues (1989) conducted an experiment in which they recorded from neurons in a monkey’s PFC while the monkey carried out a delayed-response task. The monkey first looked steadily at a fixation point, X, while a square was flashed at one position on the screen. This caused a small response in the neuron. After the square disappeared, there was a delay of a few seconds. The nerve firing records show that the neuron was firing during this delay. This firing is the neural record of the monkey’s working memory for the position of the square. After the delay, the fixation X disappeared. This was a signal for the monkey to move its eyes to where the square had been flashed. The monkey’s ability to do this provided behavioral evidence that it had, in fact, remembered the location of the square. The key result of this experiment was that Funahashi found neurons that responded only when the square was flashed in a particular location and that these neurons continued responding during the delay.
50
activity-silent working memory
Short-term changes in neural network connectivity that has been hypothesized as a mechanism for holding information in working memory. proposed by Mark Stokes (2015). the activity state, in which information to be remembered causes several neurons to briefly fire. This firing does not continue but causes the synaptic state, in which several connections between neurons are strengthened. These changes in connectivity, which Stokes calls activity-silent working memory, last only a few seconds, but that is long enough for working memory. Finally, when the memory is being retrieved, the memory is indicated by the pattern of firing in the network. Thus, in Stokes’s model, information is held in memory not by continuous nerve firing but by a brief change in the connectivity of neurons in a network.
51
Other researchers have proposed other ways of holding information in working memory that do not require continuous neural firing
These models are based on experiments and computations too complex to describe here, and all are speculative. However, they suggest that information can be stored in the nervous system by changes in the connections in neural networks. Another current idea about working memory is that it involves physiological processes that extend beyond the PFC. This idea that several regions of the brain are involved in working memory is an example of distributed representation.
52
Meredyth Daneman and Patricia Carpenter (1980)
carried out one of the early experiments on individual differences in working memory capacity by developing a test for working memory capacity and then determining how individual differences were related to reading comprehension. The test they developed, the reading span test required participants to read a series of 13- to 16-word sentences. Each sentence was seen briefly as it was being read, and then the next sentence was presented. Immediately after reading the last sentence, the participant was asked to remember the last word in each sentence in the order that it occurred. The participant’s reading span was the number of sentences they could read, and then correctly remember all of the last words. Participants’ reading spans ranged from 2 to 5, and the size of the reading span was highly correlated with their performance on several reading comprehension tasks and their verbal SAT scores. concluded that working memory capacity is a crucial source of individual differences in reading comprehension.
53
Edmund Vogel and colleagues (2005)
focused on one component of working memory: the control of attention by the central executive. They first separated participants into two groups based on their performance on a test of working memory. Participants in the high-capacity group were able to hold a greater number of items in working memory; participants in the low-capacity group were able to hold fewer items in working memory. Participants were tested using the change detection procedure. Their task was to indicate whether the cued red rectangles in the test display had the same or different orientations than the ones in the memory display. While they were making this judgment, a brain response called the event-related potential was measured, which indicated how much space was used in working memory as they carried out the task. the size of the ERP is nearly the same for both groups. However, Vogel also ran another condition in which he added some extra blue bars. These bars were not relevant to the participant’s task, so their purpose was to distract the participant’s attention. If the central executive is doing its job, these extra bars should have no effect, because attention would remain focused on the red bars. The results, show that adding blue bars caused an increase in the response of the high-capacity group but caused a larger increase in the response of the low-capacity group. The fact that adding the blue bars had only a small effect on the response of the high- capacity group means that these participants were very efficient at ignoring the distractors, so the irrelevant blue stimuli did not take up much space in working memory. Because allocating attention is a function of the central executive, this means that the central executive was functioning well for these participants. The fact that adding the two blue bars caused a large increase in the response of the low-capacity group means that these participants were not able to ignore the irrelevant blue stimuli, so the blue bars were taking up space in working memory. concluded from these results that some people’s central executives are more efficient at allocating attention than others.
54
Other experiments have gone one step further and have asked whether high-capacity participants performed
better because they are better at “tuning in” to the important stimuli or better at “tuning out” the irrelevant distractor stimuli. The conclusion from these experiments has generally been that high-capacity participants are better at tuning out the distractors. The importance of being able to ignore distracting stimuli highlights the connection between working memory and cognitive control. Cognitive control has been described as a set of functions, which allow people to regulate their behavior and attentional resources, and to resist the temptation to give in to impulses. In other words, cognitive control involves effective use of endogenous attention while limiting or suppressing exogenous attention.