Lenin said not be entirely fixated on Marxism, but what his polcies instead
pragmatic opportunism
how was the peace treaty and alliance against marxism
peace made with Imperial Germany, despite conceeding land and power which went against doctrine
What was Lenin and Trotsky ideological justification for signing armistace
Expected revolution to follow in other marxist countries - especially germany, which was politically,economically and socially ripe for revolution according to Marx’s criteria
earliest example of lenin not being marxist but pragmatic opportunist
October revolution went against doctrine, as proleteriat lead themselves
L+S difference in their role in gov
L has one party state, S has one man dictatorsiip
when Brest-Litovsk treaty
3rd March 1918
Losses of Brest-Litovsk treaty, signed 3rd March 1918
Lost 1/6 population, 2million km2 of land, 74% of coal and iron supplies
to what extent were october decrees on land ideologically driven
not - peasants already seizing land so pragmatic opportunism instead for support
fundamental evidence lenin want power for party not ideology
first evidence of lenin using supression to consolidate power
12 civilians killed when protesting against dissolving of Constituent Assembely on January 5th 1918
when bolsheviks become communsit party
march 1918
evidence that lenin favoured ideology personally
devoted his whole life to it, e.g publishing ‘what is to be done’ and publishing in Iskra in 1902
lenin view on what lead proleteriat revolution
believed he understood the needs of the proleteriat better than the proleteriat themselves did
Key Lenin introduction for power consolidation
Ban on factions, April 1921 meant that any decision made by central committee had to be accepted by party members on pain of expulsion
evidence of dealing with nat min under lenin
Gerogain independance attempt crushed in 1922
when lenin die
jan 24
when stalin affimed as undisputed societ leader
dec 29
main reason why stalin was able to bcome leader
counter-argument and why invalid of reason for one man party
It might’ve been neccessary to win the civil war, it was certianly no longer requreid from 1922
L+S, how power for themselves
L used violent revolution and force during civil war, S relied on the party and exploited ideological rifts
ways in which stalin removed opposition from within the party in a bid to assuming power