Chapter 3 Flashcards

(29 cards)

1
Q

What is considered a statement or claim ?

A

is an assertion that something is or is not the case; it is either true or false

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Critical reasoning –

A

is the careful, systematic evaluation of statements or claims

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

An argument -

A

is a group of statements, one of which is supposed to be supported by the rest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Premises -

A

the supporting statements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Conclusion -

A

the statement being supported

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What makes a good argument?

A

That’s its conclusion is worthy of belief or acceptance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Deductive arguments –

A

are supposed to give logically conclusive support to their conclusions
- its valid just in case the truth of the premises guarantees the trust of the conclusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Inductive Arguments –

A
  • are supposed to offer only probable support for their conclusions
    – is strong just in case that truth of the premises makes the truth of the conclusion probable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Good arguements must be …

A

valid or strong. but they must also have true premises.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

A valid arguments with true premises is said to be –

A

sound

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

A strong arguments with true premises is said to be –

A

cogent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Implied premises -

A

premises that are merely implied, something too obvious to mention. This creates a gap between the premises and conclusions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Moral Statement –

A

a statement affirming that an action is right or wrong or that a person (or one’s motive or character) is good or bad

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Nonmoral statement –

A

asserts that a state of affairs is actual (true or false) but does not assign moral values to it - is the link between the moral premise and the conclusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

A moral statement is needed because —

A

We cannot establish what ought to be or should be base3d solely on what is

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the best way to test a moral premise?

A

to use counterexamples

17
Q

What are Fallacices?

A

Bad arguments that are convincing.

18
Q

Begging the questions -

A

arguing is a circle - that is, trying to use a statement as both a premise in an arguments and the conclusion of that argument

19
Q

Equivocation -

A

One commits this fallacy when one “assigns two different meanings to the same term in an argument”

20
Q

Appeal to Authority -

A

relying on the opinion of someone thought to be an expert who is not

21
Q

Expert is –

A

someone who is both knowledgeable about the facts and able to make reliable judgement about them

22
Q

Slippery slope -

A

using suspicious premises to argue that doing a particular action will inevitably lead to other actions that will result in disaster

23
Q

Appeal to emotion -

A

when we try to convince someone to accept a conclusion not by providing them with relevant reasons but by appealing only to fear, guilt, anger, hate, compassion, and the like

24
Q

Faulty Analogy -

A

a type of inductive argument that says because two things are alike in some ways, they must be alike in some additional way but not only must the degree of similarity great is also have to be relevant

25
Appeal to tolerance—
This fallacy consists are arguing that a sense of evidence entitles us to believe a claim
26
27
Straw man
Amount to misrepresenting someone claim or argument so it can be more easily refuted
28
Appeal to person —
Arguing that a claim should be rejected solely because of the characteristics of the person who makes it
29
Hasty generalization—
The mistake of drawing a conclusion about an entire group of people or things based on an undersized (or unrepresentative) sample of the group