What are the other names for CI cover
Compare and contrast the cover provided by CI and IP policies
Similarities:
* Both provide cash benefits rather than indemnity for policyholders
* Premiums and payments could be inflation-linked
* CI= sometimes cover extended by use of outcome event like TDP
Differences:
* IP provides regular income from end of deferred period until return to work/end of term BUT CI provides fixed lump sum monetary benefit
* IP= cover for repeated occurrences, CI= cover for only one occurrence, after which cover and premiums cease
* IP= insured event defined i.t.o. outcomes, CI= insured event defined i.t.o causes
* IP is less restrictive
* CI=like accelerated form of life assurance, IP=ill-health pre-retirement annuity
What kind of person is CI most suitable for?
Describe the structure of a CI benefit
Structure of benefit:
* Stand-alone benefit ( more expensive but flexible and matched need. better)= SA paid on diagnosis or after survival period, no death benefit
* Accelerator of WLA or TA(with a reinstatement period without EoH) SA (less life cover when you are difficult to insure) which could include a reinstatement period after which the life cover is reinstated to its original benefit
* Rider to a policy like WLA
* Could also include a waiver of premium rider
List the needs of the customer that a standard CI policy meets
List the of major conditions covered by a CI product (7)
List the non-major conditions that could be included in a CI policy
List the extra conditions that with growing popularity of the contract and increased competitiveness are being included in cover
List the main reasons for offering tiered benefits on CI policies
List the conditions/diseases that could be included in a CI product
List the additions to benefit that can be offered
List the risks to the insurer that CI policies pose
What are the three key characteristics an illness or condition should possess to be appropriate for critical illness (CI) cover?
What is a moratorium period in the context of critical illness insurance, and why is it used?
A moratorium period is a specified initial period at the start of a critical illness contract (e.g., six months) during which the diagnosis of a critical illness will not qualify for benefit
Purpose:
◦ To reduce anti-selection risk: It helps counter situations where an insured might know they are at a higher risk for certain conditions (e.g., due to occupation) than the insurer’s underwriting procedures might detect. This asymmetry of information is a form of anti-selection.
◦ It ensures that claims are for conditions that developed after the policy commenced, rather than for pre-existing or immediately foreseeable conditions that were not fully disclosed.
Describe two major health care risks that are not covered by CI insurance
What were the advantages to insurers and reinsurers of cooperating to produce standardized claim definitions for critical illness policies?
Describe the possible impact on critical illness claim costs of increased use of screening programmes
List the desirable characteristics of a critical illness condition with regard to its suitability for cover under a CI insurance contract.
Suggest how the terms and conditions of a CI policy might be amended so that the same range of illnesses and procedures were covered, but the problems highlighted by windfall claims
are avoided
Explain the effect that medical advances might be expected to have on future critical illness rates.
Factors that influence claims experience for CI benefits (9)
Outline the key differences between tiered benefits CI products and conventional CI products, in terms of product design (11) and pricing requirements (4)
Product design differences:
For tiered benefits to be paid the benefit design will require different levels of severity to be specified.
Each level of severity will have its own level of cover.
Each level of severity will require its own claims definition.
Under the existing product a claim will result in termination of the cover.
Under the new product a claim will not result in termination of cover, unless a claim is made at the maximum severity for the full sum assured.
The new product design will need to specify how cover is reduced/reinstated after a partial claim.
The new product design will need to specify what happens if a mild condition progresses into a more serious one.
The new product design will need to specify whether there will be any reduction in premium after a partial claim has been made.
It is likely that the insurer will be liable for a wider range of claims under the new product since policyholders can claim for milder conditions than would be valid under the standard lump-sum product. Therefore, the insurer should consider implementing stricter underwriting requirements for the new benefit.
The insurer will need to ensure that its salesforce is well equipped to explain the new design to consumers as it is more complex and may lead to policyholder dissatisfaction if they do not fully understand the product.
Pricing differences:
The current product requires an incidence rate per condition by age.
The new product will require an incidence rate per condition, per severity by age.
The administration of the new product is likely to be more onerous and therefore may require a higher administration expense assumption.
There is likely to be more uncertainty in the expected claims experience of this new product, and therefore higher margins may be required in the pricing basis for the new product.