In order to reach a conclusion, what will the auditor have to do and what may occur here?
Make sense of all the information obtained during the audit - here some of the info will be more material than others
What ISA talks about audit evidence storing and recording?
ISA 230 Audit Documentation
What does the ISA 230 Audit Documentation lay out?
Protocols for storing and recording audit evidence obtained
What does the ISA 230 classify the role of documentation as? (3)
(paras 2 and 6)
What is audit documentation often referred to as?
Working papers
Define working papers.
Documentation prepared by and for, or obtained and retained by, the auditor in connection with the performance of the audit (ISA 230: para 6)
What are the 5 details auditors must reference working papers with?
Who are working papers reviewed by?
A member of staff more senior than the one that prepared them
When a working paper is review, what details are added to it?
Review also initials the WP and dates when it was reviewed
ISA 230 sets out what auditors must document in a general rule - what is this?
‘The auditor shall prepare audit documentation on a timely basis.’
How sufficient shall an auditor prepare audit documentation?
Sufficient enough to enable an experienced auditor, having no previous connection with the audit, to understand various details.
What are the 3 details which auditors have to ensure someone who has had no previous connection to the audit should be able to understand?
The 3 key details which someone with no connection to the audit should understand include info on what 6 things?
What must auditors document their reasoning on?
Significant matters where they have exercised judgement
Conclusions they have drawn
How they addressed any inconsistencies between evidence originally collected
Auditor’s final conclusions on any matters
Why is auditor’s final conclusions on any matters recorded?
So if auditor’s view on internal controls changed through the course of the audit, there should be documentation to explain this change of viewpoint
What does the ISA 230 say about how much auditors should write?`
Suggests auditors should write down enough that an experienced auditor who has no experience of the particular client could follow and understand what had been done
What will the form, content and extent of audit documentation depend on and what does this mean in other words?
Factors such as:
-Nature of audit procedures
-Risks of material misstatement
-Extent of judgement required
-Significance of evidence
-Nature and extent of exceptions identified
In other words, auditor will need to use their judgement when making this decision
What is the standardisation of working papers?
May be cases where working papers are standardised so auditor merely has to complete the client details
Give some examples of standardised working papers
Checklists
Specimen letters
Why must the auditor always take care when using standardised working papers?
Never appropriate to take a mechanical approach to auditing as audit judgement must always be exercised
Working papers usually include 10 things. Name first 5 of them.
Working papers usually include 10 things. Name the last 5 of them.
Where are working papers contained and why?
For one audit, having all the info it does this can amount to a lot of working papers so therefore are contained in audit files.
What do audit regulations usually require in relation to WPs?
Must be kept for at least six years from the end of the accounting period to which they relate