Describe the concept of materiality
An ommission/over-statement or under-statement is material if the actuary expects it to materially affect the user’s decision-making or reasonable expectations
Provide two examples of what materiality is NOT
Identify the main factor underlying the selection of a materiality level in an actuary’s work
The impact on the user
In applying judgment to determine how to address materiality, the actuary normally focuses on:
Identify circumstances where the materiality level should change
When an external benchmark is approached (Ex: regulatory action level)
Identify the six characteristics of an insurance company that may affect the materiality level
Identify a metric to test materiality for regulatory (or solvency) purposes (2)
Identify a metric to test materiality for appraisals (3)
Identify a metric to test materiality for general purpose financial statements (2)
Describe the difference between the materiality level for DCAT (FCT now) and the materiality level for valuation work
For FCT work, the materiality level is expected to be less rigorous than for valuation work, since valuation work is related to financial statements. FCT materiality level for FCT is used in scenario testing
Identify the 3 considerations regarding the disclosure of the materiality level within the actuarial work product
Does the actuary need to disclose the materiality level for things other than policy liabilities valuation or FCT?
No
Possible actions of report-writer based on materiality (3)
INCLUDE ITEM? Ask yourself whether the item should be considered?
REFINE ITEM? Ask yourself whether item is sufficiently accurate?
DISCLOSE ITEM? Ask yourself whether item should be reported
Possible further issues for investigation & discussion
How does materiality relate to the range of reasonable results in an actuarial estimate?
How does materiality relate to the inherent uncertainty associated with an actuarial estimate?
Should the actuary treat materiality differently in an internal user report?