What is the purpose of PACICC? (Property and Casualty Insurance Compensation Corporation)
Provide for reasonable level of policyholder recovery for claims & unearned premium AFTER an insurer becomes insolvent / in the case of an involuntary market exit by insurer
Who administers this policyholder recovery “plan”?
It is administered by the non-profit PACICC
Who are the members of PACICC?
Exclude:
- Auto in MB & SK
- Auto BI in QC
- Certain D&O, E&O, employer’s liability
- Fidelity, financial guarantee, marine, mortgage, surety, title insurance
- Mandatory auto coverage sold in BC, SK and MB
- Aircraft, credit, crop
Essentially, exclude unusual policy types. PACICC mostly covers only auto and homeowners (EB and Cyber are covered)
What triggers PACICC involvement? (2)
Compare OSFI vs PACICC on their roles regarding insolvency
OSFI: seeks to minimize probability of insolvency (goal is to monitor & promote solvency of insurer)
PACICC: provides reasonable recovery to policyholders AFTER insolvency
Provide the PACICC coverage limits for Auto, Homeowners and Unearned Premium
Auto: limit of 400K
Homeowners: limit of 500K
(All limits except for HO are 400K & Optional Automobile Ins in BC is 60K)
Unearned premium: payment = Min (Unearned premium,2500)*0.7
PACICC funding methods (3)
Funding: which mechanisms increase capacity?
(A,C):
- Assessment
- Compensation Fund (compensation fund is funded by assessments)
Funding: which mechanisms smooth costs?
C:
- Compensation fund can be drawn upon to smoothe annual assessments
Funding: which mechanisms reduce insurer levies
3:
- 3rd party recovery reduce insurer levies/assessments
Who does PACICC assess?
Participating solvent insurers in jurisdiction where the insolvent insurer was writing business
Limit on what PACICC may assess in aggregate
Shortfall between:
- Amounts advanced by PACICC to policyholders
- Amounts PACICC received from insolvent insurer & 3rd parties
Assessment: formula for individual insurer
A = B x (C/D)
where
- A = insurer assessment
- B = Total amount assessed by PACICC
- C = DWP of insurer
- D = total DWP of all assessed insurers
Assessment: Limit on individual insurer
1.5% of DWP (in jurisdiction)
Insurers that have failed in the past were relatively small. Considering the consolidation and growth of the P&C insurance market, evaluate whether PACICC is well positioned financially to handle insurer insolvencies in the future
Yes, because:
- OSFI, MCT regulations minimize insolvencies
- PACICC can assess solvent insurers
- A compensation fund already exists
- Doesn’t have to provide full compensation
Evaluate the performance of PACICC according to the criteria for evaluating government programs
Is it insurance or welfare?
- It is insurance (sort of) because members pay assessment fees
Is it necessary or does it achieve a social purpose that cannot be provided by private insurance?
- Yes, otherwise policyholders may be unprotected if their insurer goes insolvent
Is it efficient, or otherwise accepted by the public?.
- Yes, process already in place, self-sustainable OSFI requires insurers to have MCT greater than 150%.
What happens to policyholder claims (that haven’t been fully compensated) when PACICC receives distribution from a liquidator
Case 1: if the liquidator makes a distribution that is below the amount owed to PACICC (essentially the amount that PACICC paid to the non-compensated policyholders), then policyholders don’t get anything
Case 2: if the liquidator makes a distribution that is greater than the amount owed to PACICC (essentially the amount that PACICC paid to the non-compensated policyholders), then the policyholders will get an increase in their compensation
Identify the 3 main causes of P&C insurer insolvency in Canada