Key elements of a statistical loss reserving model (2)
2. distribution of actual emergence around expected value (range of possible outcomes)
Loglogistic growth curve
G(x) = x^omega / (x^omega + theta^omega)
Weibull growth curve
G(x) = 1 - e^ -(x / theta)^omega
*shorter tail compared to Loglogistic
Advantages to using parameterized curves to describe loss emergence pattern (3)
Number of parameters in the LDF method (*Clark)
n + 2
Number of parameters in the CC method (*Clark)
3
Reasons the CC method has a lower parameter and total variance (2)
2. additional info included in the exposure base
Difference b/w LDF and CC methods
Clark
LDF - assumes AYs are independent
CC - assumes a known relationship b/w ultimate losses across AYs»_space; described by ELR
Tests for constant ELR assumption (2)
Clark
2. plot normalized residuals against expected incremental losses and look for a random scatter around the 0 line
Variance / mean ratio (sigma^2)
= 1 / (n - p) * sum[ (actual - expected)^2 / expected)
> calculate chi-squared triangle and then sum
Advantages of using the ODP distribution (2)
Clark
Advantage of MLE
works with negative or 0 incremental loss amounts
Key assumptions from Clark’s model (3)
Residual plots to test model assumptions (what to look for and 4 types of tests)
want: random scatter around zero line
can plot against:
Handling truncation (3)
Which has the smallest variance and why: discounted or un-discounted reserves?
discounted reserves - the tail has the largest parameter variance but also receives the deepest discount
How to handle partial exposure periods
scale by % earned
Discounted reserves when decomposing AY reserves into CY components
discounted reserves = ultimate * change in growth curves / (1 + i) ^ (k - 1/2)
k = # years b/w current and avg age
Process variance when decomposing AY reserves into CY components
= sigma^2 * ultimate * change in growth curves / (1 + i) ^ (2k - 1)
Normalized residuals (Clark)
(Actual incremental loss - fitted incremental loss) / sqrt( sigma^2 *fitted incremental loss)
Parameter variance calculation
Clark
Parameter variance = var(ELR) * premium^2
Why is parameter variance generally greater than process variance?
(Clark)
Few data points in the triangle means that most of the uncertainty comes from parameter estimation (vs. randomness)
MLE term
Clark
MLE term = actual incremental loss * ln(expected incremental loss) - expected incremental loss
(Needs to not be in $000’s)