Technique to address model risk
weight multiple models
Error distributions (4)
Variance of incremental claims
Shapland
var(q(w,d)) = scale parameter * fitted incremental claims ^ z
Linear predictor GLM parameters (4)
Consequences of ODP fitted incremental claims = CL incremental claims (3)
(Shapland)
Unscaled (aka normalized) residual
Shapland
r(w,d) = (actual incremental claims - fitted incremental claims) / sqrt( fitted incremental claims ^ z)
Scale parameter formula
sum( squared unscaled residuals ) / (N - p)
where N = # data cells and p = # parameters
**should always be calculated from unscaled residuals
Number of parameters
Shapland
= 2 * # AYs - 1
or with additional development period/adjustment parameters:
= # AYs
+ (# development period parameters - 1)
+ (# hetero adjustment groups - 1)
Scaled residuals and what scaling accounts for
scaled residual = unscaled residual * DOF adj. factor
DOF adj. factor = sqrt ( N / (N - p))
> > corrects for bias/over-dispersion in residuals
Standardized residuals and what standardization accounts for
standardized residuals = unscaled residual * hat matrix adjustment factor
hat matrix adjustment factor = sqrt ( 1 / (1 - ith position on diagonal of hat matrix) )
> > ensures residuals have constant variance
Scale parameter approximation using standardized residuals
scale parameter = sum (squared standardized residuals) / N
How to incorporate process variance into incremental claims estimates
assume each future incremental value is the mean and each variance(fitted incremental value) the variance of a gamma distribution and simulate future incremental losses
Outcomes when modeling paid vs. incurred data
paid data - outcomes represent total unpaid
incurred data - outcomes represent IBNR
Common problem with ODP bootstrap model
Shapland
most recent AYs have more variance than expected b/c more age-to-age factors are used to extrapolate the sample values
> > correct for this by using BF/CC method
Limitations of the ODP bootstrap model (2)
2. tends to over-parameterize the model
Drawbacks to the GLM bootstrap model (2)
Benefits of the GLM bootstrap model (4)
flexibility
ODP vs. GLM bootstrap sampling with trapezoidal data OR when using an L-yr weighted average of LDFs
ODP - models cumulative claims instead of incremental, sample from trapezoid to entire triangle
GLM - models incremental claims directly, sample from trapezoid to trapezoid
ODP (3) vs. GLM bootstrap methods for handling missing data
ODP -
GLM - simply reduce N
Options for handling outliers in the ODP bootstrap model (2) and GLM bootstrap model
ODP -
GLM - treat like a missing value
Methods for handling heteroscedasticity under ODP (3) and GLM bootstrap models
ODP -
GLM - adding/removing parameters can reduce heteroscedasticity
Advantage and disadvantage of stratified sampling
advantage - simple and straightforward to implement
disadvantage - small number of residuals limits variability
Type of residuals used in variance parameter adjustment and scale parameter adjustments for heteroscedasticity
variance parameter adjustment»_space; standardized residuals
scale parameter adjustment»_space; use unscaled residuals to calculated adjustment factors but adjust standardized residuals
Variance parameter adjustment factor
= standard deviation (all residuals) / standard deviation (residuals in group i)