Reinsurance loss reserving problems (7)
Causes of persistent upward development of reinsurer loss reserves (3)
Components of a reinsurer’s loss reserve (6)
Methods for reinsurance reserving for short-tailed exposure categories (2)
2. reserve up to a selected LR
Method for reinsurance reserving for medium-tailed exposure categories
CL - incurred preferable, but paid can be used if more stable
Methods for reinsurance reserving for long-tailed exposure categories (6)
Advantage of using CL method for reinsurer loss reserve estimates
(Patrik)
strongly correlates future development with overall lag pattern
Disadvantage of using CL method for reinsurer loss reserve estimates
(Patrik)
so heavily correlated that credibility is low for immature years
Advantage of using the BF method for reinsurer loss reserve estimates
(Patrik)
correlates future development with an exposure measure
Disadvantage of using the CC method for reinsurer loss reserve estimates
(Patrik)
highly dependent on rate-level adjusted premium
Credibility IBNR estimate
credibility IBNR = Z * CL IBNR + (1 - Z) * SB IBNR
where Z = cred. factor * report lag
» more weight to CL as AYs mature
Potential conclusions if actual claims > expected claims (3)
Advantage of the CC method for loss reserve estimates
Patrik
more stable than CL results at early maturities