What are the two key studies of baillargeon
the impossible event study and the tall vs short carrot study
What was the aim of the impossible event study?
to test whether infants have sn understanding of object permanence using looking-time rather than reaching
what is the procedure of the impossible event study
infants as young as (3-4 months)
watched a rotating drawbridge
in two conditions
* possible event: a rotating screen stops when it hits the box
* impossible event: the screen appears to pass through the box (a hidden trapdoor removes the box)
What are the findings of the impossible
the infants looked longer at the impossible event in contast to the possible event
What conclusion can you draw from the impossible event study
infants understand that the object continue to exist
one object cannot pass thrigh anothe r(solidity rule).
this shows obeject permanence appears much ealier than piaget claimed
What is the aim of the Tall vs short carrot” study
test infants understanding of object persistance
What is the procedure of the “tall vs short careot study”
A tall & short carrot pass behind a screen with a window
The tall carrot should appear in the window
in the impossible trial the it doesnt appear.
What are the findings of the “tall vs short carrot study
infants looked at the impossible event fit 33secs, whilst at the possible event for 25secs
What conclusion can you draw frim the tall vs short carrot study
infacnts have expecations
of object jeight
object continuity
objects not disappearing ot teleporting