What does the inference theory state
That other information confuses or disrupts our memory
When is the inference theory more likely to happen?
When the information is similar
What are the two example of inference
Proactive and Retroactive
Define proactive
When old information disrupts recall of new information
Define Retroactive
When new information disrupts the recall of information of old information
What case studies support these
McGough & McDonald
Baddley & Hitch
Outline McGough & McDonald case study
rugby players
Outline Baddley & Hitch
what are the limitstations of Mcgeogh and mcdonald
disadvantages (-)
limitstions of Baddley & Hitch
disadvantage
lack of control of EV
cannot establish cause effect
may be other factors such as fatigue and lack of motivation
Who made the case study that overcomes inference
against inference
Tulving &Psotka
outline tulving & Pstoka
aim
Your more likely to forget original list the the more words you learn
outline the tulving & Pstoka procedure
Participants learned lists of 24 words, divided into six categories.
They were asked to recall the words in two conditions:
Free recall (without cues).
Cued recall (given category names as prompts).
what is the findings of Tulving & pstoka
Free recall: The more lists learned, the worse the recall (interference).
Cued recall: Recall was almost 100%, even after multiple lists.
conclusion ir tulving & Pstoka
forgetting in the LTM is mainley due to retreival failure (lack of cues)