Explanations for Forgetting: Interference Flashcards

(15 cards)

1
Q

What does the inference theory state

A

That other information confuses or disrupts our memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

When is the inference theory more likely to happen?

A

When the information is similar

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the two example of inference

A

Proactive and Retroactive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define proactive

A

When old information disrupts recall of new information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Define Retroactive

A

When new information disrupts the recall of information of old information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What case studies support these

A

McGough & McDonald
Baddley & Hitch

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Outline McGough & McDonald case study

A
  • Participants learned 10 words that were synonyms with 100% accuracy (old list)
  • particpants had to learn another list with new list of items (new list)
  • supported retroactive as they werent abke to remeber old list as they were synonyms
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

rugby players

Outline Baddley & Hitch

A
  • Asked rugby players to recall tea,m theyve played against this season
  • included players who played most ganes and players who missed a few
  • players who played more games had more inferencing information so forgets more
  • compated to those who played less games due to injury
  • this supoorts retreoactive interference can disrupt memory
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what are the limitstations of Mcgeogh and mcdonald

disadvantages (-)

A
  • lacks mundane realism as ina real life scenrio you will probably recall information in several days not in 2hrs
    shows inference isnt valid reason to explain forgetting in LTM
    *lacks ecological validity
    so wont be able to apply to real life scenrios
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

limitstions of Baddley & Hitch

disadvantage

A

lack of control of EV
cannot establish cause effect
may be other factors such as fatigue and lack of motivation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Who made the case study that overcomes inference

against inference

A

Tulving &Psotka

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

outline tulving & Pstoka
aim

A

Your more likely to forget original list the the more words you learn

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

outline the tulving & Pstoka procedure

A

Participants learned lists of 24 words, divided into six categories.
They were asked to recall the words in two conditions:
Free recall (without cues).
Cued recall (given category names as prompts).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is the findings of Tulving & pstoka

A

Free recall: The more lists learned, the worse the recall (interference).
Cued recall: Recall was almost 100%, even after multiple lists.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

conclusion ir tulving & Pstoka

A

forgetting in the LTM is mainley due to retreival failure (lack of cues)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly