kewyword
crime
keyword
deviance
formal social control
Informal social control
functionalist theorist of crime
Durkhiem
He argues that crime is healthy for societies, too much crime leads anomie
he identifies 4 functions to crime
- reaffririmg boundaries
- social cohesion
- safety vale
- changing values
4 functions
reaffirming boundaries
public shaming is a way of showing society what will happen if laws are broken, therefore reminding poeple that they must be law abiding
e.g. shamima begum = left the UK at 15 to join ISIS, resulting in her never being able to join the UK
suggests that we must conform to the socially approve ways of society so that we dont get sanctioned
Changing values
E.G. Aluwahila, was charged with murder and imprisoned for life on the ground of ‘provocation’ (After she set her husband on fire after suffering abuse and brutality for 10 years). But government replace this law with a new defence of ‘killing in response to a fear of serious violence’
Social cohesion
Evaluation of Durkheim: weakness
Merton’s Strain Theory
Meetings 5 responses to strain:
- Rebellion
- Conformity
- Innovation
- Ritualism
- Retreatism
Rebellion
Conformity
Individuals conforms to the norms and values and continues with the same goals
Ritualism
Indivisible gives up on goals and norms and values of society e.g. homeless
Retreatism
Individuals abandon the goals but still conforms to societies norms and values
Evaluation of mertons strain theory weakness
1) Merton assumes that there is a value consensus and that people only deviate because of structural strain but in reality, people have different values. ⬇️
- For example, Westernised countries hold the point of view of material wealth being important (ethnocentric) but what about other party’s if the world
2) Mertons theory only accounts for utilitarian crime. What about crimes such as vandalism and violence
3) ignores the reason why people cannot gain material wealth e.g. alleviate opportunists and subcultures e.g drug dealing theft
Utilitarian crimes
Crimes committed for the acquisition of material reward e.g. theft
Non- Utilitarian crime
Crime that does not have a financial/ material reward (Murder, rape)
Status Frustration: Cohen
Evaluation: Cohen theory
Functionalism: Cloward & Ohlin
(Used to support a paragraphs of cohen + Merton)
Clowards & ohlin 3 structures (subcultures)
CRIMINAL SUBCULTURES
- creates a career in utilitarian crime. (deviant career) = this links to Mertons responses to strain more specifically rebellion = creates new goals
CONFLICT SUBCULTURES:
- Gangs organised by young people themselves, often based on claiming territory from other gangs in so called “turf-wars”
- Prevents a stable professional criminal organisation to emerge and instead forms a gang for releasing young men’s frustration. = aligns with cohens status frustration
RETREATIST SUBCULTURES
- Double failures that fail in legitimate and illegitimate opportunity structure. Usually turn to drug
Evaluation of Cloward & Ohlin
Marxism & crime
Three elements in which it does this:
1. Criminogenic capitalism
2. The state & law making
3. Ideological functions of crime & law