Primary data
Information collected by sociologists for their own purposes.
Methods of gathering primary data
Advantage of primary data
Disadvantage of primary data
Secondary data
Second hand data
Examples of secondary data
Official statistics
Advantage of secondary data
Disadvantage of secondary data
Resources may not provide the exact information needed
E.G. it’s geographical features
date e.g. diary
Qualitative data
(narrative).
In-depth information usually expressed in words
interpretivist prefer this method.
Unstructured interview are an example of this
Quantitative data
Refers to information in numerical form
Official statistics is an example of this
Methodological perspective
The view of what society is like and how we should study it.
There are two contrasting perspectives of methods
Positivism & interpretivism
Positivists - ( social facts) Durkheim
Believe society shapes the individual
Refers quantitative data e.g. social surveys, structured questionnaires and official statistics because these have good reliability and representativeness.
Interpretivist - (Verstehen) - Weber
How interpretivists and positivist differ
Positivists
* believe society shapes an individual = we can discover facts in a completely objective way
* systematic, scientific methods.
While, Interpretivists believe
* that individual shape society
* objectivity is impossible, we must value subjectivity (opinions) = as individuals are intricate / complex
Experiments
Laboratory experiments
Takes place in a controlled environment. Used to discover cause & effect’ relationship.
strength:
* Control – lab experiments have a high degree of control over the environment & other extraneous variables which means that the researcher can accurately assess the effects
* Have a narrow focus - only examine one specofic aspects of teacher expectations, such as body language for example.
* Reliablity - Replicable – due to the researcher’s high levels of control, research procedures can be repeated.
Two groups of the laboratory experiments
The experimental group
The control group
The experimental group
The group under study in the investigation.
The control group
The group which is similar to the study group who are held constant
problems of the laboratory experiments
Using experiments to investigate education
Example
May use experiments to study issues such as:
Teacher expectations
Labelling
The self fulfilling prophecy
Teacher expectations:
- Some teachers have preconceived ideas about pupil’s
- Teachers based their ratings on the similarities they perceived between the children in the photographs and pupils they had taught. This study indicates that teachers label pupils from different social classes and use these labels to pre-judge pupils’ potential.
Ethical problems
Young people’s vulnerability and their more limited ability to understand what is happening mean that there are greater problems of deception, lack of informed consent and psychological damage. These ethical concerns are a major reason why laboratory experiments play only a limited role in educational research.
Field experiments
limitations of feild experiments
MIC
Lab Experiments and teacher expectations