Eysenks 3 factor model
Psychoticism
Extraversion vs introversion
Neuroticism vs stability
Eysenck theory of personality
States that out personality is innate and has a biological basis
Personality is genetic, we inherit a type of nervous system that predisposes us to offending
Halfway between psychological and biological approach
Highlights a personality type known as the ‘criminal personality’
How does Eysenck measure personality
Eysenck’s personality questionnaire
Measures where an individual is along the E, N, L dimensions to determine their personality type
extroversion - introversion
neuroticism - stability
liar scale
Eysencks personality questionnaire, Lie scale and social desirability
Inclusion of a falsification scale providing the detection of response distortion. Lie score out of 9, measures how socially desirable you are trying to be in your answers.
Those who score 5 or more on this scale are probably trying to make themselves look good and not being completely honest
What is extroversion
Extroversion = people are more outgoing, enjoy social interactions, prefer the company of others, seek excitement and stimulation
What is introversion
Introversion = more reserved, thoughtful, quieter, more reflective. Prefer solitary activities or smaller social gatherings
Recipe for the criminal personality (3 factor model)
Psychoticism + extroversion + neuroticism =
Criminal personality
Biology of extroversion and how this contributes to a criminal personality
The reticular activating system (RAS) is in the brain stem, where spinal cord meets the brain.
When external stimuli enters the brain the RAS acts as a filter controlling how much stimulation we receive.
Extroverts have a RAS that filters out more information which means they are less stimulated. Results in lower levels of cortical arousal so extroverts seek higher stimulation as they don’t naturally get enough stimulation so can then to crime to get an adrenaline rush
Also do not condition easily and do not learn from mistakes .
Thrill of committing a crime may draw them to offending behaviour
Biology of introversion
RAS = lets more information through, not as much filtering occurring so these people are being over stimulated already and their cortical region has a high level of arousal.
Because already high stimulated, more sensitive to extra stimuli so they don’t want or seek any extra arousal so won’t seek any more stimulation in life .
Quieter environments preferred and thrill of committing a crime would over stimulate them so less likely to be drawn to offending behaviour
Environmental element of Eysenks theory
Eysenck explained criminality in terms of the outcome between innate personality and socialisation.
Person born with certain personality traits, but interaction with the environment is key in the development of criminality.
Criminal behaviour, associated with development of immaturity, selfishness and immediate gratification.
Eysencks conditioning
People with high E and N scores cannot be conditioned easily because of lower arousal they don’t learn from punishment/rewards = more likely to engage rule breaking
What is neuroticism
Refers to an individuals emotional instability
People high in neuroticism are more likely to react strongly to stress
What is stability
Emotionally stable
Remain, calm, balanced and composed even in stressful or challenging situations
Biological of neuroticism and how it contributes to a criminal personality
Emotional instability, reacts strongly to stress
Over active limbic system, involving the amygdala and hypothalamus that regulates emotions where emotional states are regulated, such as fear and aggression. React swiftly and strongly to stressors
Means their behaviour is difficult to predict in high levels of emotion
More likely to commit a crime in an emotionally charged situation
What is Psychoticism
Tendency to lack empathy, antisocial
Excess of dopamine neurons causing overproduction of dopamine.
More likely to commit a crime as they are aggressive and lack conscience, guilt, remorse
Eysenck (1977)
SUPPORT
Compared 2070 male prisoners score on EPQ and 2422 male controls.
Subdivided into ages group (16-69)
Across all age groups, prisoners recorded higher scores on EPQ than controls on PEN compared to non criminals
Eysenck and Eysenck (1973)
Female research
264 female offenders in UK
Completed EPQ
Found that all offenders scored higher on the EPQ PEN than controls
Similar findings to that of male offenders
Raine et al (1997)
Murderers brain scan showed less active prefrontal cortex, less self control links with neurotic traits
Barton and Holanchock (1979)
Hispanic, American male prisoners in NY
Gave EPQ and compared male prisoners against non criminals
Scored lower on extroversion than the control group
Less outgoing and thrill seeking than Eysenck predicted
Not culturally valid?
4 limitations of Eysencks theory
Farrington et al (1982) - reviewed 16 studies and found that offenders tend to score highly on P and N measures but not always E
Cultural bias - Eysenck studied mainly white westerns European participants. Guilty of property crimes (doesn’t measure personality for serious crimes)
Social desirable, may lack validity
OVERSIMPLIFICATION of the classification of criminals