What does moral reasoning refer to?
What did Kohlberg propose?
What level are offenders more likely to have their moral reasoning classified at?
Pre-conventional level.
What does pre-conventional level mean?
Evaluate moral reasoning.
(+)
1) Palmer and Hollin (1998) compared moral reasoning between 210 female non-offenders, 122 male non-offenders and 126 convicted offenders using 11 moral dilemmas, such as not taking things that belong to others.
- The offenders showed less mature moral reasoning than the non-offenders.
(-)
1) The level of moral reasoning may depend on the type of offence.
- Thornton and Reid (1982) found that individuals who committed crimes for financial gain, such as robbery, were more likely to show pre-conventional reasoning than those convicted of impulsive crimes (such as assault), where no reasoning was evident.
What are cognitive distortions?
What is hostile attribution bias?
What is minimalisation?
Evaluate cognitive distortions. (Advantages)
1) Understanding the nature of cognitive distortions has proven beneficial in the treatment of criminal behaviour.
- The dominant approach in the rehabilitation of sex offenders is cognitive behavioural therapy.
- This encourages offenders to ‘face up’ to what they have done and establish a less distorted view of their actions.
- A reduced incidence of cognitive distortions in therapy is highly correlated with a reduced risk of offending.
Evaluate cognitive distortions. (Disadvantages)
1) One key failing with the cognitive approach is that, whilst it explains thinking,it cannot account for the source of these thoughts(is it nature or nurture?).
2) Cognitive distortions cannot be observed or measured. This means the cognitive explanation of criminal behaviour is not scientific.