Who proposed a theory to explain why people conform?
Deutsch and Gerrard
Why do people conform?
1) Normative Social Influence
2) Informational Social Influence
What is normative social influence?
What is informational social influence?
Evaluate normative and informational social influence (ADVANTAGES)
1) Jenness (1932) asked participant to estimatehow many beans they thought were in a jar.
- Each participant had to make an individual estimate first, and then do the same as a group.
- He found that when the task was carried out in a group, the participants would report estimates of roughly the same value (even though they had previously reported quite different estimates as individuals).
- This is likely to be an example of informational social influence as participants would be uncertain about the actual number of beans in the jar and so be genuinely influenced by the group.
2) Asch (1951) asked participants to say which of three ‘test lines’ was the same as the ‘standard line’.
- The participants were in a group with confederates who purposefully gave the same wrong answer, even though the correct answer was obvious.
- In 33% of the trials the participants conformed to the group and gave the wrong answer (the chance of making a genuine mistake on this task was only 1%).
- Participants conformed due to normative social influence.
- After the experiment they claimed that they knew the correct answer but were worried that the group would ridicule them if they answered differently to everyone else.
3) Lucas et al 2006 asked students to solve easy and more difficult math questions. There was greater conformity when the maths question were harder and this was especially true for the students who rated their maths skills as being poor. This shows that we do look at other people and assume they are right when we are unsure/lack confidence in our own answer, in order to be right/ have the right information.
Evaluate normative and informational social influence. (DISADVANTAGES)
1) Dispositional factors(i.e. personality traits) may also impact whether or not a person conforms.
- Kurosawa (1993) found that people with high self-esteem were far more resistant to conformity than those with low self-esteem.
2) NSI and ISI work together; for example in Asch’s line study the dissenter could have reduced NSI by providing social support or may have reduced ISI by proving alternative information. Even in everyday life both NSI and ISI can work together when making a decision on whether to conform or not, this suggests Deustch and Gerrad’s two process approach involves both NSI and ISI not one or the other.
3) Some people called nAffiliators have a greater need for being in a relationship with others, McGhee and Teevan (1967) found that students high in need of affiliation were more likely to conform. This suggests there are individual differences for NSI.