Independent variable
variable that the researcher manipulates in order to determine its effect on the dependent variable.
Dependant variable
the variable that is being measured.
Extraneous variables
any variables other than the IV that can affect the DV.
Control condition
a baseline or standard for comparison where the independent variable is absent or held constant
Operationalisation
When variables must be defined and stated how it will be measured
Laboratory experiments
Carried out in controlled environment
High IV control, eliminates any EV
Pps are randomly allocated to a condition (no bias)
Artificial setting
Advantage 1 of lab experiments- control
High level of control on IV
More likely to collect valid data as no EV
Advantage 2 of lab experiments- replicated
Can be easily replicated by other researchers
Can see if similar results are obtained, and therefore if they are reliable
Disadvantage 1 of lab experiments- demand characteristics
Easy for pps to figure out its fake
Change behaviour accordingly
Some pps behave in a more positive way (social desirability)
Disadvantage 2 of lab experiments- mundane realism
Lack mundane realism due to high control
Doesn’t have ecological validity, so cannot generalise findings to wider world
Field experiment
Carried out in real world/natural setting
IV is still manipulated or controlled
Advantage 1 of field experiment- mundane realism
More mundane realism and eco validity
Reflects real life
Advantage 2 of field experiments- less demand characteristics
Pps might not even be aware they are being studied
So will behave more naturally and therefore more valid results gained
Disadvantage 1 of field experiments- EV
More chance for EV compared to lab experiments
The effect of thr dependant variable may not be caused by the IV but by EV
Not valid research
Disadvantage 2 of field experiments- less control
Less control over sample
So may not be representative of the target population
Natural experiments
Researcher takes advantage of a naturally occurring incident
Variables aren’t directly manipulated
Finding pps who already meet the conditions of the experiment
Advantage 1 of natural experiments- mundane realism
High mundane realism and eco validity compared to lab
Advantage 2 of natural experiments -good for unethical situations
It is good when it is impossible to manipulate the iv/sample in a lab or field experiment as it is would be damaging
Disadvantage 1 of natural experiments- hard to replicate
Often very unreliable and if thr experiment was repeated it’s unlikely the same results would be gained again
Disadvantage 2 of natural experiments- cause + effect
Hard ro determine cause and effect due to low levels of control
If A causes B or B causes A
Quasi experiments
Naturally occurring independent variable
The IV is a difference between ppl that already exists (gender, age)
Usually to study the natural difference between ppl
Usually lab setting
Advantage 1 of quasi experiment- control
High level of control
Experimenter can be more confident that the IV is what affected the DV
Advantage 2 of quasi experiments- replication
Easy to replicate due to strict controls
You can therefore test the reliability of findings easily
Disadvantage 1 of quasi experiments- lacks ecological validity
Artificial experiments
Doesn’t reflect real life behaviour