Memory Flashcards

(81 cards)

1
Q

What is the Multi-Store Model

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the sensory register

A

The sensory register gathers information from our sense organs, and each sense is coded differently

Duration-
Limited- 1/4- 2 seconds
Capacity-
Very large
Encoding
Sense organs

If we pay attention to the sensory information, it will pass to the Short Term Memory
Forgetting occurs due to decay

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the short term memory

A

Duration-
18-30 seconds max
Capacity-
Limited- 5-9 items
Encoding-
Acoustic

Maintanence Rehearsal- allows information to be held in the Short Term Memory
Elaborative Rehearsal- transfers information from the Short Term Memory to the Long Term Memory

Forgetting occurs due to displacement and decay

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is long term memory

A

Duration-
A few minutes to a lifetime
Capacity-
Unlimited
Encoding
Semantically

Forgetting occurs due to interference, and retrieval faliure (often due to lack of retrieval cues)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the Evaluation points for the Multi-store model

A

Clinical studies
Experimental support
LTM and STM arent unitary stores
Too much emphasis on rehearsal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the clinical studies (evaluation of the Multi- Store Model)

A

P- Evidence to support the distinction between STM and LTM includes clinical studies of patients with Korsakoffs syndrome (KS)
E- Chronic alcoholics sometimes develop Korsakoffs because of damage to parts of their brain
E- STM not affected, LTM severely impacted
E- For example, you could carry out a conversation with someone with KS, but they will not be able to remember it.
R- Supports the multi-store model, as it shows a clear distinction between LTM and STM and that each store is seperate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the experimental support (evaluation of the multi-store model)

A

P- Experimental support that STM and LTM are seperate stores
E- Glazner and Cunitz study on primancy and recency effects
E- Gave participants a list of words and asked them to remember as many as they could
E- Found that participants are more likely to rememer the first few and the last few than the middle words. Can be explainmed as the first get transferred to LTM through rehearsal, and end words still in STM
R- Supports the multi- store model, as shows that STM and LTM are seperate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is LTM and STM are not unitary stores (Evaluation of the multi-store model)

A

P- One issue is the MSM proposes that LTM is a single unitary store, howevever evidence suggests its made of multiple components
E- Tulving
E- He proposed that the LTM is made up of episodic, semantic and procedural memory
E- Clive Wearing- suffered extensive brain damage, and lost his episodic memory (e.g. cannot remember his wedding), but still has use of his procedural memory (e.g. can still play the piano)
R- Suggests there are at least 2 seperate systems of LTM, so criticses the multi store model as its view is too simplistic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is too much emphasis on rehearsal (evaluation of the multi- store model)

A

P- Multi store model suggestrs rehearsal is the only way to transfer information from the STM to the LTM
E- So the model lacks validity
E- As we do not always need to rehearse infomation to remember it, and there are other things than impact how information is transferred.
E- For example, some things are easier to remember because they are funny, distinctive, or significant, and what is distinctive or significant to one perosn may not be for another
R- Individual differences in human memory influence how information is transferred and is not accounted for by the multi- store model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was the research into the capacity of the Sensory Register

A

Sperling

**Procedure: **
Flashed a grid of letters onto a screen for 1/20th of a second, and asked participants to recall the letters from one of the rows. Sperling sounded a different tone to decide which row the participant should recall
Findings:
Recall of the indicated row was high, suggesting all the information was there, so the capacity of the SR is quite large

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was the research into the duration of the Sensory Register

A

Treisman

Procedure:
Participants were presented with identical auditory messages to both ears, with a slight delay between each
Findings:
Participants noticed the messages were identical if the delay was 2 seconds or less. Suggesting the SR has a limited duration of 2 seconds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was the research into the coding of the Sensory register

A

Crowder

Findings
Crowder found the SR only retains information presented visually for a few milliseconds
However, Information presented in auditory form can be retained for 2-3 Seconds
Supports the idea SR is coded in different formats

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the research into the Capacity of the Short term memory

A

Jacobs

Procedure:
Particicpants were presented with a series of letters or digits that they had to repeat back immediately in the same order. List lenght increased by one until participants consistently made mistakes
Findings:
The average STM span was between 5-9 items. Digits were recalled better than numbers.
Experimental design:
Repeated Measures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What was the research into the Duration of the Short Term memory

A

Peterson and Peterson

Procedure:
Presented nonsense trigrams to participants, and asked them to recall the trigrams after an increasing amount of time. They were prevented from rehearsing the trigrams by counting backwards in 3s from 999.
The % of trigrmas correctly recalled was recorded for each time interval
Findings:
Found that if rehearsal is prevented, then recall is negatively affected, with the maximum duration being around 18-30 Seconds.
Experimental Design:
Repeated Measures design

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What was the research into the Coding of the Short term memory

A

Baddely

Procedure:
Presented participants with one of two lists, A- acoustically simialr words (cat, mat sat), and B- acoustically disimilar words (pit, day, cow). And participants were given the list in the wrong order, and had to rearange the words in the correct order.
Findings:
Participants given list A, performed worse, with a recall of 10%
Suggests STM is coded on an acoustic basis
Experimental Design
Independent groups design

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What was the research into the Capacity of the Long term memory

A

The capacity of the LTM is assumed to be limitless, as research hasnt been able to prove otherwise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What was the research into the Duration of the Long term memory

A

Bahrick

Procedure:
400 participants between 17-74
Shown photographs and names of old high school classmates and asked to identify them
Findings:
Found 90% of people could remeber their classmates names and faces after 15 years
80% could remember classmates names and 70% of faces after 48 years.
Suggests meaningful memories are long lasting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What was the research into the Coding of the Long term memory

A

Baddeley

Procedure:
Participants were presented with one of two lists, C- semantically similar words (big, huge, tall), and list D- semantically dissimilar words (hot, safe, foul). After 20 minutes, participants were given the list in the wrong order and they had to rearrange the words into the correct order
Findings:
Participants given list C performed worse, with a recall of 55%
Suggesting LTM is coded on a semantic basis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is the working memory model

A

Baddely and Hitchs working memory model is a model of STM. It suggests that the STM is more complex than the multi-store model said.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is the central executive

A

Features
Controls the other slave components and decides which component is required for a task
Involved in planning, problem-solving solving and decision-making
Decides what the working memory pays attention to

Capacity
Limited to no storage capacity

Coding
Flexible as each sense is coded differently

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is the Phonological loop

A

Processes acoustic information

Features
Can be sub-divided into
Primary Acoustic Store- Linked to Speech perception. revieves and remembers sounds in the order they were presented
Articulatory Process- Linked to speech production. Prepares sounds using rehearsal

Capacity
Limited capacity (2 Seconds)

Coding
Codes information acoustically

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What is the Visuo-Spatial Sketchpad

A

Processes visual information

Features
Can be sub-divided into
Visual Cache- Stores material about form and colour
Inner Scribe- handles spatial relationships

Capacity
Limited Capacity (3-4 objects)

Coding
Codes information Visually

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What is the Episodic buffer

A

Features
Brings together different types of information from the Visuo-Spatial sketchpad adnt he phonological loop
Provides temporary storage of information
Is controlled by the central executive
Plays an important role in retrieving information from the LTM

Capacity
Temporary storage system
Limited capacity of about 4 chunks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What were the Evaluation points of WMM

A

Studies of dual task performance support the existence of the Visio-spatial sketched

Research support from PET scans

Central executive is over simplified

WMM does not account for all types of memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Evaluation of WMM- studies of dual task performance support the existence of Visio spatial sketchpad
P-studies support Visuo spatial sketchpad E- baddely E- pps had more difficulty when doing 2 visual tasks, than visual and verbal. E-both visual tasks compete for the vssp, and exceed the limited capacity, R-supports idea of different components within working memory
26
Evaluation of WMM- Central executive is oversimplified
P- one issue is central executive is oversimplified E- case study of EVR E- EVR performed well on tests requiring reasoning, but had poor decision making after a tumor was removed E- these things suggest CE was intact, and also damaged R- suggest several components of CE rather than one
27
Evaluation of WMM- doesn’t account for all types of memory
P- WMM doesn’t account for all types of memory E- Berz E- doesn’t account for musical memory, as we can listen to instrumental music without imparing performance on other acoustic tasks E- shoudl occupy primary acoustic store, but doesn’t R- suggests WMM doesn’t give complete picture of how memories are processed
28
What is forgetting
Failure to retrieve memories from the long term store
29
What is the interference theory
Forgetting in LTM can occur because of interference, where one set of information competes with another causing them to be confused More likely when information is similar and short time between learning
30
What are the two types of interference
Proactive Previous information competes with new information so new information is forgotten Retroactive Recent information competes with old information so old information is forgotten Retroactive
31
Evaluation points for interference theory
Research support for proactive interference Artificiality Research support for retroactive interference
32
Evaluation of interference theory- research support for proactive interference
P- research support for proactive interference E- Wickens E- 4 trials, nonsense trigrams, 3 were letter based, last number based. E- performance declined in 1-3 but was almost 100% in 4 R- evidence of interference as old information interfered with newer as it was similar to
33
Evaluation of interference theory- Artificiality
P- research criticised for being artificial E- wickens E- lacks mandate realism, as used nonsense trigrams E- research has very little relevance to everyday situations R- ecological validity can be question
34
Evaluation of interference theory- research support for retroactive interference
P-research support for retroactive interference E- baddely and hitch E- rugby players recalled names of opposition teams E- those who played most games had poorest recall R- new information interfered with old causing them to be forgotten
35
What is retrieval failure
People forget information due to sufficient cues
36
What are the two types of retrieval failure
Context dependent forgetting: External cues, like words, places, smells Forgetting more likely to occur when contexts are different from learning to rehearsal State dependant forgetting: Internal cues, like mood, emotional state Forgetting more likely to occur when internal states are different at time of learning and recall
37
Points of Evaluation of retrieval failure
Research support for state dependant forgetting Research for context dependent forgetting Application to real world Retrieval cues do not always work
38
Evaluation of retrieval failure- research support to state dependant forgetting
P- one strength is research to support state dependant forgetting E- Goodwin et al E-participants who learned info drunk, more likely to forget when sober. And recalled better when sober E- internal cues presenr during learning were absent recall R- shows how different internal state can lead to forgetting
39
Evaltuation of retrieval failure- research support for context dependant forgetting
P- one strength is research support for context dependant forgetting E- Godden and Baddely E- study with divers, learned on land or underwater and recalled on both E- those who learnt underwater, were more likely to froget when recalling on land and vise versa R- suggests forgetting occurred due to lack of external cues
40
Evaluation of retrieval failure- retrieval cues do not work
P- limitation of retrieval failure is contexts are actually not very strong irl E- baddeley E- contexts have to be very different for an effect to be seen E- like in godden and baddely study, underwater or or land but in real world environments arent often that different R- validity of this explanation is reduced
41
What is an eyewitness testimony
The evidence provided in court be a person who has witnessed a crime/incident.
42
What is a leading question
A quetion that suggests what answer is desired, or leads the person to a desired answer
43
What was the procedure of Loftus and Palmers study into leading questions
Lab experiment, Independent groups 45 American students shown 7 films of car crashes. After each they were given a questionare with one critical question THey changed the verb in the critical question in the groups, and the pps were asked to estimate speed of the cars.
44
What were the findings of Loftuas and palmers study
Estimated speed was affected by verb used Smashed= highest (40.8mph) Conctacted= lowest (31.8mph)
45
What were the conclusions from Loftus and Palmers study
Language can affect EWT, and can lead to inaccurate accounts. Has implications for the questions used in police interviews of eyewitnesses
46
What are the two explanations to why leading questions affect eye witness testimony
Respoen bias- wording of the question influences the answer they give, not their memeory Substitution explanation- memory has been altered.
47
What is post event discussion
Any information disussed after th event has happened which could influence a persons memory
48
What was the procedure of Gabbert et al's study into post event discussion on EWT
Lab experiment, Paired participants Watched video of the same simulated robbery but from different angles, then discussed what they had seen, then completed a test of recall. Measured the number of incorrect items recalled by the pps as a result of post-event discussion
49
What were the findings of Gabbert et al's study
71% mistakenyl recalled aspects picked up in post event discussion 60% said girl was guilty, despite not seeing her commit a crime 0% of control group made errors
50
What were the conclusions of Gabbert et al
Witnesses go along with each other,, to win social approval, or because they believbe the other is right. Police need to gather information quickly before post event discussion can occur
51
What are the points of evaluation for leading questions
Reliability Contradictory researfch
52
What is reliability (evaluation for leading questions)
P- Many studies have been conducted and found similar results E- Loftus E- used a range or controlled experiments shwoing different edxamples of EWT. E- due to bieng in lab, could control extraneous variables, so the research was easy to replicate. R- Means researchers using identical procedures should produce simialr results
53
What is contradictory research (evaluation for leading questions)
P- One limitation is there is contradictory research E- Yuille and Cutshall E- Found leading questions did not reduce accuracy of recall E- Interviewed witnesses of a real robbery of a gun shop, and found very accurate recall of thecrime, despite bieng given two misleading questions initially. R- Suggests misleading questions may have less influence on the accuracy of eyewitness testimony
54
What is real life application (evaluation of leading questions)
P- Research into leading questions as it has real life application E- Important practical uses for police officers and investigators E- Highlights the need to take care in how they phrase their questions when interviewing eyewitnesses E- to avoid leading questions from distorting the eye witnesses memory R- Can improve how the legal system works and improve the quality of eyewitnesses testimonies
55
What is the yerkes Dodson curve
Shows that there is best recall at medium anxiety, and at high or low anxiety there is poorer recall.
56
What is weapon focus effect
A weapon distracts attention because of the anxiety it creates. So negatively affects the ability to recall details
57
What was the aim and procedure of Johnson and Scotts study into how anxiety affects recall
Aim- To investigate whether high levels of anxiety will affect accuracy of recall Procedure- Two conditions, one with weapon one without, pps asked to sit outside a room where they heard a discussion between two people Low anxiety- Conversation was peaceful, man came out holding pen with grease on hands High anxiety- Conversation more heated, man came out holding knife covered in blood Measured number of correct identifications made of the man from 50 pictures
58
What was the findings and conclusion of Johnson and Scotts study
Found that in low anxiety, 49% identified the man. In high anxiety, 33% identified the man Suggests weapon distracted attention from person holding it, so explains why eyewitnesses sometimes have poor recall.
59
What was the Procedure of Loftus and Burns study into how anxiety affects recall
Participants watched a film of a simulated robbery. Some watched a non violent version, some watched a violent version where a boy was shot in the face
60
What were the findings and conclusions of Loftus and Burns study
Those who watched the non violent condition recalled more details of the crime than those who watched the violent version Higher anxiety affected the memory of the event.
61
What are the points of evaluation of the research into how anxiety affects recall
Reliability Surprise not anxiety Contradictory evidence
62
What is reliability (evaluation of research into how anxiety affects recall)
P- Other studies have similar results E- Loftus and Burns E- Participants were put into groups, and shown either a violent or non violent version of a robbery E- Found that those who watched the non violent could recall significantly more details R- Backs up the idea that higher levels of anxiety, and weapon focus effect leads to worse accuracy of recall
63
What is surprise not anxiety (evaluation of research into how anxiety affects recall)
P- Reduced accuracy of recall casued by weapon focus could be due to surprise not anxiety E- Pickel E- Asked pps to watch a thief enter hairdressing salon carrying scissors, a handgun, a wallet, a raw chicken E-Found eyewitnes testimony was poorer in high surprise conditions(raw chicken) rather than high threat conditions (with the handgun) R- Suggests weapon focus may be due to surprise not anxiety, so questuions the validity of research into anxiety, as may not be measuring effect of anxiety on research
64
What is Contradictory evidence (evaluation of research into how anxiety affects recall)
P- Criticises research as it doesnt reflect real life E- Christianson and Hubinette E- Questioned 110 real witnesses to 22 real bank robberies. E- Found that witnesses who had been threatened in som eway were much more accurate in their recall of details. Those who had been onlookers and less stressed, remebered less. R- People are good at remembering highkly stressful events in real life rather than artitfical surroundings, so casts doubt over the fact that high anxiety affects recall.
65
What are the points for evaluation of resarch into post event discussion
Reliability Lack ecological validity
66
What is Reliability (evluation of research into post event discussion)
P- Reliable evidence demonstrating similar results E- Skagerburg and Wright E- showed two groups slightly different versions of a robbery, one saw a light brown jacket, another saw a dark brown jacket on the culprit E- After viewing pps placed into pairs, and discussed the event. And many reported a medium brown jacket, despite that bieng in neither video R- Shows that post event discusion can lead to memory contamination, and their memories are distorted to match the others view of events
67
What is Lacks ecological validity (evaluation of research into post event discussion)
P- Studies lack ecological validity E- Much of the research uses video clips of crimes in lab settings E- Means pps dont experience real fear shock or stress of a real crime. whcih affects memory. E- Witnesses are more aroused, and more motivated to be accurate so are less influenced by others R- This suggests lab findings may overestimate post event discussion as dont reflect emotional intensity of genuine eyewitness situations
68
What is the cognitive interview
A police technique for interviewing witnesses to a crime, and encourages them to recreate the event using stages, which increases the accuracy of recall
69
What are the 4 techniques of the cognitive interview
Context reinstatement Report everything Recall from changed perspective Recall in reverse order
70
What is context reinstatement
Interviewee returns in their mind to the situation where the event occured Interviewer encourages them to recreate the environment in as muhc dfetail as possible. And asks them to think back to before during and after the eventW
71
Why does context reinstatement wokr
Believed that there is a mental consistency between the actual incidenct and the recreated situation. Contextual and emotional cues help them remember more details about the event
72
What is report everything
Report every detail about the event even if it seems irrelevant
73
Why does report everything work
Trivial details that might seem unimportant may be important, and may trigger other memories.
74
What is recall from changed perspective
Asked to mentally recreate the situation from other poeples perspectives, like from the viewpoint of another witness
75
Why does recall from changed perspective work
Disrupts the effect that schemas hav on our recall, and make the witness think about what actually happeend instead of what they think should happen in a particular situation
76
What is recall in reverse order
Asked to describe the event in reverse order, or start with the most memorable moment and work back
77
Why does recall in reverse order work
Prevents use of schemas Prevents dishonesty as it is much harder to provide and untruthful account if they have to reverse events
78
What are the points for evaluation of the cognitive interview (compared to standard interview)
Research to support the effectiveness of cognitive interview Cognitive interview is not always appropriate Cognitive interview may increase amount of inaccurate information
79
What is the research to support the effectiveness of cognitive interview (evaluation of cognitive interview)
P- Evidence shows cognitive interview to be effective in improving eyewitness acounts E-Geiselman et al E- Shows pps police training vids of violent crimes. 48h later interviewed abnout films using cognitive, standard and hypnosis interviews. E- Found that cognitive interview had most accurate recall, followed by hypnosis then standard R-Strength because it shows cognitive is more effective than standard
80
What is cognitive interview is not always appropriate (evaluation of cognitive interview)
P- One issue is police may sometimes be reluctant to use cognitive interview E- As takes more time and greater ost E- as more time is nbeeded to allow witness to relax, and to be able to use all stages of it. And it also requires special training for interviewers E- Many police forces may not carry out a complete Cognitive interview because of this, and may have to use less effective methods R- Shows how the practical application of pyschology can sometimes be restricted by the economy
81
What is Cognitive interview may increase amount of innacurate information (evaluation of cognitive interview)
P- Research has found that the cognitive interview can increase inaccurate information E- Kohnken et al E- techniques of the cognitive interview aim to incrtease recall of correct info, but may also increase recall of incorrect info E- found 81% increase of correct information, but also a 61% increase of incorrect information compared to standard R- Problem becuase CI might sacrifice quality of eyewitness testimony in favour of quantity of information. Means police need to treat al linformation from CI with caution