PIAGET’S THEORY in morality
* Premoral reasoning stage (<4 years old)
*** Autonomous Morality (morality of cooperation) **- 11/12 or older:
* Rules as social agreement
* Sensitive to fairness and equality
* Focus on motives and intentions
* Moral relativism
this change comes from Cognitive development and time with peers
* Children do increasingly consider intentions and motives
KOHLBERG’S THEORY
LEVEL 1:
PRECONVENTIONAL MORAL REASONING
punishment and reward
* Stage 1: Punishment and Obedience Orientation
* Right = obeying authority, avoiding
punishment
* external consequences
* ex:should not steal the drug because he will be punished
* Stage 2: Instrumental and Exchange Orientation
* Right = what will result in rewards
* “Tit for tat”/”quid pro quo”
* ex: he should steal because she will be alive - the reward of having her alive
external punishment and reward
LEVEL 2:
CONVENTIONAL MORAL REASONING
social comparesion and social norms
LEVEL 3:
POSTCONVENTIONAL MORAL REASONING
rare,deeper moral principles
* Stage 5: Social Contract of Individual Rights Orientation
* Right = uphold rules in the best interest of the group or those agreed upon by the group
* Right = universal values of life, liberty
* Emphasis on law, but willingness to change with rational considerations
* ex: should steal the drug because althoug is wrong for social order, the right for life is more imporatnat then rules we have
* Stage 6: Universal Ethical Principles
* Right = self-chosen ethical principles that reflect
universal principles of justice
* Civil disobedience
* some principles are above the law
these two stages are now seen as one stage
KOHLBERG’S THEORY#
KOHLBERG’S THEORY:
CHALLENGES
*
ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOUR:
AGGRESSION
*** Instrumental aggression: **
motivated by a desire to obtain goal
ex: i want their homework > i punch him
Physical aggression
high in toddlerhood/
early childhood, then
decreases
Social/relational
aggression
increases in middle
childhood/
adolescence
* More for girls
ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOUR:
CHEATING
wh do kids and adolecents cheats
CHEATING:
INFLUENCES
* Mindset: more common for
fixed mindset about
intelligence.
*** Praise: **more common when
told you are “smart” (ability
praise)= cheating > to uphold that idea
Does ability praise
increase cheating
when it’s indirect– ie,
just overheard about
another person?
Young children are
more likely to cheat after
overhearing that a classmate is smart
(social compareson?)
PROSOCIAL BEHAVIOUR
actions that help other people
alturism motivation:helping others
not for external rewards or social
approval
are we born to be pro-social?
to a certain degree
but socialization is also very important!
infants show prosocial behaviour
sociazilation
Young children are more likely to cheat after overhearing that a
classmate is smart(Li zhao)
results: 5years old but not 3years old cheated significally more often if they overheard classmate praised for being smart
implication:overhad evaluatieve comments can be an imporratnt force in shaping more development