Change Management and Contingency Approaches
Change Management Approaches
discontinuous change
occurs in static environments
- multistep models have to be applied including al the steps
continuous change
occurs in dynamic environments
- staff here already is accustomed to change and therefore the models don’t need to be applied step for step
3 elements to be managed in transformational process
3 transformational change phases
utility of normative steps (critique)
(read not learn)
What does Kotter acknowledge about his 8 step framework?
Has change management supplanted (replaced) OD?
Contingency Approach
Dunphy/Stace Contingency Model of Change
Scales of change:
-> as different paths of change the org. might adopt at different periods of time
developmental transition
- leadership style is consultative (coach)
task-focused transition
- may be more consultive by managers further down in org. implementing the change
charismatic transformation
turnarounds
taylorism (least successful)
- charismatic transformation or turnaround should be used at some stage to reinvigorate
Huy and categorization of change
Why are contingency approaches not as dominant as the change management approaches?
Processual Approaches
Who provides the backdrop to the processual approach?
Pettigrew and his study of the chemical industry
What timeframe does the Processual Approach take?
external context
economic, political, and competitive environment
internal context
What does context provide managers with? (processual approach)
opportunity and constraints of change