Policy Context
Institutions
Political-Economic Context
two meta institutions: Democracy and Capitalism
-both affect the capacity of the state to act autonomously
Capitalism
Liberalism
Democracy
Policy Making Meta-Institutional Context
How Political and Economic Structure Influence Public Policy
-state capacity to make public policy shaped by supportive societal actors (type determined by internal organization and relationship to the state)
-fragmented social groups: strengthens state autonomy in public policy and weakens capacity to formulate because difficult to mobilize actors.
-united social actors/groups: stable environment, strong social cohesion is a constraint on the state.
Best structure is embedded autonomy, where the institutional arrangement that has both a strong state and strong society with close partnership.
Unitary v.s Federal
unitary: top down, clear chain of command and hierarchy. different levels of government linked in a subordinate/super ordinate relationship.national government has public policy decision making power, reduces complexity in public policy process.
federal system: at least two autonomous levels of government each with own policy jurisdiction. weak policy capacity of national government in some policy sectors. weak policy capacity of national governments in some policy sectors. difficult to maintain consistent and coherent policies in intergovernmental agreement areas.
Presidential v.s Parliamentary
presidentialism: policy making is diffuse. greater opportunity for interest group influence. checks and balances to constrain presidential power. president needs legislative approval.
parliamentary: generally policy making is centralized in the executive
Domestic Policy Actors
International System
-countries are supposed to be sovereign but the international system shapes domestic public policy. influence determined by structure of international system and a nations positions within it. (some actors constrained and some enabled)
-there may be specific regimes that exist in many policy areas. certain regimes can sanction intervention.
Actors: states, international financial institutions and organizations.
-globalization of the world economy results in policy spillovers. policy diffusion and policy transfer.
-ideas: policy paradigms are a set of high level ideas that structure policy debates. cognitive background assumptions. actor interaction with institutions is justified by ideas.
Policy Regime and Policy Networks
Policy Network:
-structure and behavior of networks is determined by the number and type of their membership and the state or societal members that dominate their activities.
Policy Regime:
Agenda setting is
Agenda
the agenda is the list of subjects/problems to which government officials and other policy actors closely associated are paying serious attention to at any given time. Narrows list of conceivable subjects to a set that actually becomes the focus of attention. doesn’t guarantee it will be addressed.
Positivist Agenda Setting
Post-Positivist Setting
Objective Construction of Policy Problems
Convergence Thesis
-as countries industrialize, tend to converge towards same policy mix generally
- issues originate in the level of development of a society
-sets of problems are common to states at similar levels of development
-high levels of economic development and wealth create similar problems and opportunities
-agenda setting as an automatic process as a result of stress on government placed by industrialization and economic modernization
Limitations: oversimplification, misrepresentation of welfare policies in different jurisdictions, ignore economic variation over time and by issue area.
Resource-Dependency Model
-industrialization creates needs for programs and generates resources because increases of productivity to allow states to address them. ex) pension, social security
-creation of working class with needs for social security and political resources to exert pressures
-ideology and political threat based.
Limitations:
abstract, difficult to apply to specific instances of agenda setting
Political Business Cycle
-governments in the modern era intervene in markets to smooth fluctuations in business cycle (democratic capitalist states)
-the economy has its own internal dynamics that are occasionally altered by political interference
-nature of intervention in the economy is predictable, dependent on ideology and timing of the intervention (proximity to election)
Limitations in its applicability outside the US.
Subjective Construction of Policy Problems
Types of Ideas
Models of Agenda Setting
2. Issue-Attention Cycle