CMA
The Competition and Markets Authority is the UK Government regulator tasked with ensuring that the creation of monopoly power is avoided and that consumers are not exploited in markets
The main forms of consumer exploitation include higher prices, less choice and/or poor quality products
There are similar regulators in Europe (European Competition Commission) and in the USA (Antitrust Commission)
CMA function
One way to control monopoly power is to prevent it from forming in the first place
A key function of the CMA is to monitor merger activity with the aim of preventing any single firm gaining more than 25% market share
If there are concerns about the merger then the CMA has the authority to stop it from happening, or they can allow it to go ahead but insist the new firm sells certain assets which would limit its market share
CMA context point
in July 2022 the CMA launched an investigation (opens in a new tab) into the merger of two companies which produce foam used in bedding and cleaning products as they believed it would lead to higher prices and less choice
CMA intervening in markets
In addition to controlling merger activity, the CMA continuously intervenes in markets in order to promote competition and to protect the interests of consumers
4 types :
1. Price regulation
2. Profit regulation
3. Quality standards
4. Performance targets
Price regulation
Monopolies aim to produce at the profit maximisation level of output (MC=MR)
This results in higher prices and restricted output in the market
The CMA uses maximum prices to lower prices and increase output
One way in which they determine where the maximum price should be is to identify the point of allocative efficiency and set the maximum price where AR=MC
This strategy is often used on natural monopolies
Firms will make less supernormal profit than before, especially when any price increases are set below the rate of inflation: RPI - X
Profit regulation
The CMA may choose to limit the supernormal profit a monopoly can earn
They do this by calculating the firm’s total costs and then adding a percentage of profit to it
However, it is a very contentious policy as
Quality regulation
One way to maximise profit is to reduce the quality of the raw materials, which reduces the quality of the end good/service
If there are no substitutes then this is a likely outcome
Regulators can step in to insist that certain quality standards are met
It can be difficult for them to know what the potential quality of a product is or what standards to impose
Firms push back on these quality standards as they reduce their supernormal profit
Performance targets
Regulators can set performance targets so as to raise the quality of the service and improve customer satisfaction
This is often seen in the rail industry where targets are set based on the percentage of trains running on time
Natural monopoly context
The UK water industry is a natural monopoly that was privatised in 1989
Intervention to Promote Competition & Contestability
Promotion of small businesses
providing tax incentives or subsidies to small firms can help increase the number of new entrants into industries and thus promote competition
Deregulation
Government regulations can increase industry costs or act as a barrier to entry. Removing regulations can promote competition, which will also increase the contestability in the market
Competitive tendering for government contracts
Occurs when the Government draws up a specification for a good/service it wants to provide & receives bids from private firms to provide it
As a major provider of goods/services in the economy, the government could choose to manufacture many products itself, and this would decrease competition.
By outsourcing the supply of these products, it generates more private sector activity and increases competition
Privatisation
Firms are hesitant to enter an industry when the dominant firm is owned by the government and has access to all of the government’s resources.
Privatisation encourages new entrants to the industry as they feel they can compete more effectively with private firms, which perhaps have fewer resources available to them
e.g. In April 2022, the UK Government confirmed that Channel 4 would be privatised
Protecting suppliers
Monopsony power is abusive towards suppliers and, over time, can change the nature of entire industries in an economy
Nationalisation
Occurs when the Government takes control & ownership of firms which were in the private sector
Can be used to break the market power of the abusive firm, resulting in better treatment of suppliers
In 2024, the Labour government pledged to nationalise the rail network within 5 years.
Protecting employees
Wage bills for firms are often one of their highest costs as a proportion of expenditure
With a goal of profit maximisation, firms will always seek to reduce their wage expenditure, as this will result in higher profit
There is a role for government to protect workers who could be exploited by firms
The government uses the following methods to protect employees:
The Impact of Government Intervention - prices
Affordable + stable prices
The Impact of Government Intervention - profit
Permitting enough to keep firms in the industry (normal profit) but limiting how much they make so that household income is protected
The Impact of Government Intervention - efficiency
Reducing wastage of valuable resources and one of the best ways to achieve this is by developing rigorous competition
The Impact of Government Intervention - quality
Ensuring products are fit for purpose and contribute to a better standard of living
The Impact of Government Intervention - choice
Wider choice improves the standard of living and also helps to improve product quality.
More choice also generates more economic activity and increases GDP.
Limits to Government Intervention
Government intervention is not always effective. Two of the main reasons for this are the existence of regulatory capture and asymmetric information
Regulatory capture
Regulatory capture occurs when firms influence the regulators to change their decisions/policies to align more with the interests of the firm
Firms spend millions lobbying regulators directly - or in many cases lobbying politicians who can issue instructions to the regulators
Some lobbying activity is corrupt and there is a fine line between influencing activity and bribing.
The UK Government has an agenda to improve the transparency of any lobbying activity
Naturally, regulatory capture can completely prevent fair outcomes in the markets concerned