Erik and piagets theory
Developmental Theory Definitions
Psychosocial & Cognitive Development Theories
Erik Erikson: Psychosocial Development
Jean Piaget: Cognitive Development
Roy and melisis
Nursing Theories: Roy and Meleis
Nursing Theories: Roy & Meleis
Summary Table for Testing
Nursing phenomenon
Study Note: The Anatomy of a Phenomenon
Definition: A phenomenon is the conscious awareness of an experience that comprises (makes up) the lives of humans.
What it means: If the patient doesn’t feel it, notice it, or process it, it isn’t a phenomenon.
The Rule: No awareness = No phenomenon.
Example: A patient under anesthesia isn’t having the “phenomenon of surgery” until they wake up and feel the recovery process.
What it means: Only the patient is the expert. Nurses cannot “measure” a phenomenon with a machine; they have to ask the patient.
The Nursing Goal: To provide individualized care based on that specific patient’s reality, not just their medical chart.
What it means: These aware moments—the fear, the joy, the pain, the relief—are the actual “bricks” that make up the patient’s life and memory of their illness.
Theories
Abstract Concepts (The “Idea”)
These are expressions of an idea that are not tied to one specific moment. They are general views of a phenomenon.
Text Example: Social Support. You can’t reach out and touch “social support” itself. It is a feeling, a belief, or a general process of being connected to others.
Why it’s Abstract: It’s a “big picture” concept. Everyone has a different idea of what it looks like.
🧱 Concrete Concepts (The “Reality”)
These refer to actual instances or specific realities. They are focus-oriented and easy to identify in the real world.
Text Example: Family Caregiver. This is a specific person. You can see them, talk to them, and observe them assisting a person with diabetes.
Why it’s Concrete: It is a specific “thing” or person rather than just a general idea.
Statements of abstract and concrete
Study Note: The “Sentence” Test for Phenomena
Course: PNUR 129 – Foundations of Research
A sentence is still Abstract if it uses “big idea” words to define a concept. It explains the meaning, but you still can’t touch it.
The Phenomenon: Social Support.
The Abstract Sentence: “An interpersonal process centered on the exchange of information and the feeling of being loved and esteemed.”
Why it’s still Abstract: You cannot physically touch a “process,” “information,” or a “feeling.” These are mental experiences.
A sentence becomes Concrete when it names a specific person, place, or thing that you can see with your eyes or measure with a tool.
The Phenomenon: Social Support.
The Concrete Statement: “A family caregiver (a person) assists a patient with Diabetes Mellitus (a medical condition).”
Why it’s Concrete: You can take a photo of the caregiver, and you can measure the patient’s blood sugar. It points to a specific instance in the real world.
Philosophy
Topic: The Foundation of Philosophy
1. What is Philosophy?
The “Why”: It is a foundational way of thinking about the world.
The Process: It starts by looking at the nature of the universe and the human mind (yourself and others).
The Goal: To find meaning in those observations so you can form a “belief system.”
The Spark: A theory cannot exist without a belief. You must first believe in a certain “truth” about humans before you can create a rule (theory) on how to care for them.
The Framework: Philosophy provides the “skeleton” or framework. If your philosophy is holistic (mind + body), your theories will focus on both. If your philosophy is mechanical (body only), your theories will only focus on biology.
Articulating Knowledge: Philosophy is the tool we use to take a messy idea (like “What is health?”) and turn it into a clear, described concept that others can understand and follow.
Observation: (Looking at the Universe/Humans)
Philosophy: (What you believe based on those observations)
Concept: (Defining the big ideas, like “Dignity” or “Care”)
Theory: (The specific plan or “blueprint” based on those beliefs)
Assumption
you put them in order of how they build on each other, it looks like this:
Assumptions (The Roots): These are the starting “truths” that you take for granted. Without these, you have nothing to build on.
Philosophy (The Trunk): Once you have your assumptions, they grow into your Philosophy (your belief system and “vibe”).
Theory (The Branches): Finally, your philosophy gives life to a Theory (your actual plan of action for the patient).
Why this order is so important:
If you change the Assumption: The Philosophy and Theory will change too.
Example: If you stop assuming “Patients want to help themselves” and start assuming “Patients are too overwhelmed to help themselves,” your entire philosophy of care shifts from “Coaching” to “Providing.”
If you have a Theory without Philosophy: You are just following a manual without knowing why. This makes it hard to handle “gray areas” in the hospital.
If you have Philosophy without Assumptions: Your beliefs are floating in the air with no foundation. You won’t be able to explain the “rational” (logical) reason for your choices.
Concept
The Nursing Metaparadigm (The “Big Four”)
The text explains that all nursing theories are built using four specific concepts:
Person: The individual, family, or community receiving care.
Environment: The internal and external surroundings affecting the person.
Health: The degree of wellness or well-being the person experiences.
Nursing: The actions and attributes of the nurse providing care.
Key Lesson: If a theory doesn’t address these four things, it isn’t considered a “nursing” theory.
This is the “vertical sequence” mentioned in Fig 7.2 of your photo. It teaches you how to move from a “fuzzy” idea to a “concrete” fact:
Construct (Most Abstract): These are broad, complex categories (like “Social Support” or “Quality of Life”). They are “untouchable” because they are made up of many different ideas.
Concept (The Building Block): This is a specific label given to a phenomenon. A theorist must define it so everyone understands the “word” the same way.
Variable (Most Concrete): This is the narrowest level. It is defined so it can be measured. It results in numerical values (like a blood pressure reading or a score on a scale).
The text explains that theories aren’t just definitions—they describe the relationships between concepts.
What it teaches: A theory acts as a framework. It suggests that if you change one concept (like the Environment), it will cause a change in another (like Health).
The Goal: By identifying and defining these concepts clearly, researchers create a “stronger basis” for their study.
The text uses Social Support as a perfect example of this transition:
Phenomenon: You observe a patient getting help from a friend (Real-life event).
Concept: You label that event “Social Support” (The professional name).
Variable: You measure “Household Income” or “Number of Visitors” (The concrete data).
Variables
Defining the Variable: Emotional Social Support
Before a researcher can measure something, they must define it. The text defines emotional social support as:
“A person’s perceived emotional encouragement or affirmation that he or she receives during a stressful time.”
In research terms, this is the conceptual definition. It moves the idea from a vague feeling to a specific “variable” that can change from person to person.
Purpose: Originally used for persons with heart failure to see if they have enough support to aid recovery.
Structure: It consists of seven questions.
Categories: It doesn’t just look at “kind words.” It measures three distinct aspects:
Instrumental: Tangible help (e.g., someone helping with chores or driving to appointments).
Emotional: Feelings of being loved and affirmed.
Informational: Receiving useful advice or directions.
By assigning numerical values to the survey answers (e.g., 1 for “None of the time” to 5 for “All of the time”), researchers can calculate a final number. This number allows them to compare different patients and determine who has “high” vs. “low” social support scientifically.
Conceptual data
Study Note: Conceptual Data vs. Operational Data
Conceptual Data in Nursing Research
Definition: Conceptual data consists of the meanings, words, and connotations (the “baggage”) used to define a construct. It is the qualitative information that explains the “essence” of a human experience before any numbers are involved.
The “Jar” Analogy:
Key Characteristics:
Conceptual vs. Operational:
Role in Research: If the conceptual data is wrong (e.g., defining “Anxiety” as “Anger”), the entire study fails because the variable will be measuring the wrong thing.
Construct vs variable
The “Word Bank” (Conceptual Definition)
As you said, the researcher creates a Word Bank (the baggage).
If it’s a Construct: You use that word bank as a “checklist.” You look at the patient and ask: “Does their life match my bank of examples?” If yes, the construct is valid for that patient.
If it’s a Variable: You use that same word bank to write the questions. If your “baggage” for Anxiety includes “racing heart,” then your survey question will be: “How often does your heart race?”
You correctly identified that the Variable is the only one that uses both:
It uses Conceptual Data to stay meaningful (it knows what it is measuring).
It uses Operational Data to stay scientific (it knows how much it is measuring).
You correctly noted that to get that data, you have to actually do something:
Measure: Hand them the scale and get their “Patient Answer.”
Manipulate: Do the experiment (like your nursing interventions) to see if the answer changes.
Opperational makes questions around conceptual definition
The questions in the Operational Definition are literally the Conceptual Definition turned into a checklist.
The researcher takes every single “word” in the conceptual word bank and writes a question for it so they can count it.
Statements
Nursing Research: Statements and Theory Testing
Research Statements and Theory Testing
Proposition
Nursing Research: Propositions & Hypotheses
Research Framework: From Propositions to Hypotheses
The Hierarchy Check:
Grand theory
Grand Nursing Theories Notes
Grand Nursing Theories
Definition: The most abstract level of theoretical thinking. These are broad, universal frameworks that provide a global view of nursing.
Key Characteristics:
Major Examples:
Research Application:
Orems self care
Orem’s Self-Care Deficit Theory Notes
Orem’s Self-Care Deficit Theory
Core Concept:
Nursing is needed when a patient’s Self-Care Demand (what they need to do) is greater than their Self-Care Agency (what they are able to do). This gap is called a Self-Care Deficit.
Goal of Nursing: To increase the patient’s Self-Care Agency and promote independence and growth.
Martha Roger’s
Martha Rogers: Science of Unitary Human Beings Notes
Martha Rogers: Science of Unitary Human Beings (SUHB)
Core Concept:
Humans are not a collection of parts; they are Unitary Human Beings. We don’t just have energy; we are energy fields that are inseparable from the environment.
Goal of Nursing: To harmonize the human and environmental energy fields to promote health and well-being.
Imogene king
Imogene King: Theory of Goal Attainment Notes
Imogene King: Theory of Goal Attainment
Core Concept:
Nursing is a process of human interaction. The patient and nurse are two people who communicate, set goals together, and take action to achieve those goals.
Goal of Nursing: To help the patient attain their goals to maintain health so they can function in their roles.
Situation specific theory
Situation-Specific Theory (Practice-Level)
1. Core Definition
• Nature: The most concrete and narrow level of nursing theory.
• Purpose: To provide specific approaches for specific situations.
• Goal: To bridge the “clinical gap” between general theory and specialty practice.
• Instructional: Acts like a “Specialist’s Manual” rather than a general map.
• Variable-Focused: Uses medical/specialty “identified words” (e.g., “Antidepressants,” “Saline rinse,” “Low-sodium diet”).
• Dementia: Using step-by-step cueing for dressing instead of just “encouraging independence.”
• C-Section Recovery: Using a splinting pillow specifically for abdominal incisions.
• Does this name a specific diagnosis?
• Does it name a specific specialty?
• If yes, it is Situation-Specific.
Middle range
Middle-Range Theory (Substantive)
1. Core Definition
• Nature: The “Workhorse” of nursing. It is more concrete than Grand theory but more general than Situation-Specific theory.
• Purpose: To provide a substantive framework that identifies specific concepts and relational statements.
• Scope: Covers broad clinical categories (e.g., Pain, Comfort, Stress, or Wound Care).
• Instead of just “Environment,” it identifies “Noise levels” or “Lighting.”
• Instead of just “Self-Care,” it identifies “Brushing teeth,” “Dressing,” or “Feeding.”
• Relational Statements: It creates a clear link: If the nurse does X, then the patient outcome is Y.
• Broad Population: Applies to “Hospitalized Adults,” “The Elderly,” or “Surgical Patients” generally—not limited to one specific disease.
• Theory of Chronic Pain: Managing pain for anyone with long-term discomfort, regardless of the cause.
• Self-Care Deficit: Helping any patient who cannot perform daily ADLs (like brushing teeth).
• Does it name a Specific Action (Variable)?
• Does it apply to a Wide Group of patients?
• If yes, it is Middle-Range.
Grand theory
Grand Theory (The Conceptual Framework)
1. Core Definition
• Nature: The most abstract and “wide-angle” level of nursing theory.
• Purpose: To provide a global philosophy or “map” for the entire profession.
• Scope: Universal. It covers all of nursing, in all places, for all time.
• It defines the Metaparadigm: Person, Health, Environment, and Nursing.
• It does NOT give specific instructions (no “identified words” like brushing teeth).
• It focuses on General Principles (e.g., “Wholeness,” “Dignity,” “Adaptation”).
• Universal Applicability: It applies to a patient in a NICU in Toronto just as much as a patient in a clinic in rural India.
• Philosophical: It explains the “Why” and the “Soul” of nursing.
• Orem’s Self-Care Deficit Theory (Grand Level): The broad idea that humans have a natural need to care for themselves.
• Rogers’ Science of Unitary Human Beings: Looking at humans as energy fields.
• Is this a Big Idea that applies to everyone?
• Does it avoid specific medical words or “substantive” actions?
• If yes, it is Grand Theory.
Theoretical framework
Theoretical Frameworks in Nursing Research
Theoretical Frameworks in Nursing Research
Definition: A theoretical framework is an abstract, logical structure of meaning that guides the development of a study. It serves as the blueprint or map that connects the high-level theory to the concrete research actions.
Key Characteristics:
Visual Structure: Theoretical frameworks are often expressed as Maps or Models.
Role in Different Study Types:
Purpose: Without a framework, a study is just a collection of facts. The framework allows the findings to be integrated into the broader Body of Nursing Knowledge, making the research meaningful and repeatable for other nurses.
Framework
Nursing Research Frameworks and Propositions
Nursing Research: The Framework Logic
Framework
What your textbook is REALLY saying (simple)
A research framework is:
An abstract (not step-by-step) structure
That shows concepts + relationships
And explains why one thing affects another
👉 So yes — what you said is correct:
It shows why one concept leads to another concept
🔑 Key parts from your page (translated)
1. “Concepts and relationships”
This means:
Concepts = things like brushing, plaque, gingivitis
Relationships = how they connect
👉 Example:
Brushing → less plaque → less gingivitis
2. “One variable causes change in another”
This is super important.
Independent variable = the cause
Dependent variable = the result
👉 Example from your text:
Exercise (cause) → weight loss (effect)
👉 Your example:
Brushing teeth (cause) → reduced gingivitis (effect)
3. “Explained abstractly”
This is why it’s not steps
It doesn’t say:
“Brush for 2 minutes, twice a day”
Instead it says:
“Brushing leads to reduced plaque, which lowers infection risk”
👉 That’s the logic, not instructions
4. “Expressed as a diagram (model)”
That part about arrows is important:
A framework often looks like:
Brushing → Plaque ↓ → Gingivitis ↓
Arrows = relationships between concepts
🧩 Put it all together
Your understanding now should be:
✅ A research framework:
Is general
Shows cause-and-effect relationships
Uses concepts + arrows (mentally or in a diagram)
Explains why outcomes happen
❌ It is NOT:
A checklist
A procedure
Step-by-step instructions