Temperament
the basic emotional style appearing in early development, largely genetic
Temperament Study
NY Longitudinal study (30yrs):
Results:
1) Easy (40%) - calm, chill, can adapt
2) Difficult (10%) - fussy, can’t adapt
3) Slow to warmup (15%) - Shy but did adapt
4) Average (35%) - range of responses
What model did this study come up with?
Goodness-of-fit model: a child’s development is optimized when environment is adapted to child’s temperament characteristics
Attachment
the strong emotional connection we share with those to whom we feel closest
Attachment
Harlow & Zimmerman (1959)
- is feeding cause of attachment?
- wire mother (fed) vs cloth mother (did not feed)
- infant monkey was placed in a cage with 2 mothers
Results:
- monkeys went to cloth mother bc contact comfort and sense of security
- when scared they went to cloth mother
Bowboy’s Ecological Theory on Attachment
Strange Situation Procedure
- series of separations and reunions of infants with their mothers
Results:
60% secure - child cries when w/ stranger, stops crying when mom returns
15-20% insecure avoidant - no reaction when mom leaves or returns
15-20% insecure anxious - w/o mom would cry and still cry when mom was back
5-10% disorganized - sometimes avoidant, sometimes shocked at moms return
Attachment is influenced by
quality of care & attachment styles (which can change overtime)
Baumrind’s Experiment on Parenting
Procedure:
- interviewed parents
- home & lab observations of parent-child interactions
Measured:
- control/demandingness
- warmth/responsiveness
Results:
Authoritative - lots of structure & lots of warmth (optimal!)
Authoritarian (think: authority figure) - lots of structure & little warmth
Permissive - (best friend parents) low structure & lots of warmth
Uninvolved/neglectful - low structure & low warmth
Limitations of Baumrind’s research
1) not generalisable - studied only white families
2) direction of causality - temperament and attachment can affect parenting & vice versa (so the question is what influences what?)
Erikson’s Social Development Theory
Came up with 8 stages
Each has a psychosocial crisis: dilemma concerning individiuals’ relation to other people
1) Infancy - birth to 18months
Crisis: trust vs mistrust
- can i trust my caregivers?
Outcome: hope
2) Early Childhood - 18 months to 3yrs
Crisis: autonomy vs shame and doubt
- autonomy: kids exploring by themselves
- shame & doubt: parents telling them no
outcome: will to do diff things
3) Preschool - 3 to 6yrs
Crisis: Initiative vs guilt
- initiative: child takes initiative and parents reinforce with praise
- guilt: introduced to criticism, rules & boundaries through language
outcome: purpose - exploring other things
4) School age - 6 to 12yrs
crisis: industry vs inferiority
- industry: taking further initiative
- inferiority: comparison to peers and learned ideas of success
outcome: competence - developing an awareness of their strengths & weaknesses
5) adolescence - 12 to 18yrs
crisis: identity vs role confusion
outcome: fidelity - understanding the lifelong process of finding who you are
6) Young adulthood - 19 to 40yrs
crisis: intimacy vs isolation
outcome: love
7) Middle Adulthood - 40yrs to 65yrs
crisis: generativity vs stagnation
- generativity: contributing to society, establishing a legacy, feeling productive
- stagnation: feeling unproductive, not moving forward
outcome: care
8) Old Age - 65 yrs to grave
crisis: integrity vs despair
- integrity: development of self respect for long life
- despair: feeling regretful at life
outcome: wisdom - lessons gained from life experiences
Criticisms of Erikson’s Theory
Advantages of Erikson’s Theory