Morality judged by consequences
UTILITARIANISM
Greatest good for the greatest number
UTILITARIANISM
__________ – Quantitative (pleasure vs. pain)
Bentham
________– Qualitative (higher vs. lower pleasures)
Mill
Mill – _____________
Qualitative (higher vs. lower pleasures)
Bentham – __________
Quantitative (pleasure vs. pain)
FOUR THESES OF UTILITARIANISM
Consequentialism
Hedonism
Maximization
Universalism
Rightness = outcomes
Consequentialism
Happiness = ultimate good
Hedonism
Most good, least bad
Maximization
Everyone’s happiness counts equally
Universalism
BENTHAM VS. MILL
BENTHAM:
Pleasure = greatest good
MILL:
Happiness = common good
Pleasure = greatest good
BENTHAM
Hedonic calculus (quantitative)
BENTHAM
Act utilitarianism
BENTHAM
Happiness = common good
MILL:
Higher vs. lower pleasures (qualitative)
MILL
Rule utilitarianism
MILL
4 VARIANTS OF UTILITARIANISM
Act Utilitarianism
Rule Utilitarianism
Preference Utilitarianism
Negative Utilitarianism
Follow rules that maximize good
Rule Utilitarianism
Judge each act
Act Utilitarianism
Respect people’s wants
Preference Utilitarianism
Minimize suffering
Negative Utilitarianism
STRENGTHS of UTILITARIANISM (3)
Clear & practical
Focuses on collective good
Useful in policy & crisis
Examples: Vaccination, disaster relief, healthcare allocation