What is validity?
Accuracy—measures what it’s supposed to.
What is reliability?
Consistency—produces stable results.
Can something be reliable but not valid?
Yes—like a scale that’s always 5 lbs off.
What are the four main types of validity?
Face, Content, Criterion-related (Empirical), and Construct.
What is face validity?
How valid a measure appears “on its face”; based on appearance, not data.
What is content validity?
Ensures the measure covers all relevant aspects of the concept.
What is criterion-related validity?
Compares test results to an external standard or outcome.
What are the two types of criterion-related validity?
Predictive and Concurrent.
Predictive vs. Concurrent validity?
Predictive forecasts future outcomes; Concurrent compares with current measures.
What is construct validity?
Tests whether a measure truly represents the theoretical concept intended.
How is construct validity supported?
By consistent results across multiple studies.
What is empirical comparison?
Correlates test scores with a criterion (predictive or concurrent).
What are the three methods for assessing validity?
Expert judgment, empirical comparison, and construct testing.
What is expert judgment used for?
Evaluates face and content validity based on expert review.
What is construct testing?
Tests hypothesized relationships between constructs using data.
What are the main ways to assess reliability?
Interrater, Test-Retest, and Parallel-Forms (plus Internal Consistency).
What is interrater reliability?
Consistency between multiple observers’ results.
What is test-retest reliability?
Stability of results when the same test is repeated over time.
What is parallel-forms reliability?
Consistency between two equivalent versions of a test.
What does internal consistency measure?
How consistent items within a single test are.
How is internal consistency assessed?
With split-half reliability or Cronbach’s alpha.
What is the range of r?
-1.0 to +1.0.
What does +1.0 mean?
Perfect positive relationship.
What does -1.0 mean?
Perfect negative relationship.