Week 1 Flashcards

(31 cards)

1
Q

describe the priority principle

A

for an event A to cause an event B, A must occur before B.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

define the covariation principle

A

If A occurs, B also occurs. one is the cause of another.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

define temporal continguity principle

A

in addition to covariation, cause and effects need te be linked by contiguous events.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

define similarity of causes and effects

A

things being equal causes and effects should be similar in nature. bottles with a pink cap, makes the water ….. pink.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

categorisation knows which three levels?

A
  1. superordinate–>animal
  2. basic–>dog
  3. subordinate–>retriever
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

explain how via an experiment called sequential touching researcher can determine the abbility to categorize among young children.

A

sequential touching–>young children (can not speak) shown a serie of objects and see which ones they picked out.

This can show patterns above chance if they categorize objects.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

which category of understanding develops first in children?

A

mixed research conclusion Basic vs superordinate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

the role of language

  • what is the difference between thematic relations and categorical relations?
  • give an example
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

fill in the blacks based on chronological order regarding categorisation development in children:
* perceptual to ….
* ….. to specific
* intuitive to ….

A
  • contextual
  • general
  • factual
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

explain a syllogism

A
  • form of deductive reasoning
  • general premise (all….) and a specific premise (this….)
  • conclusion based on premises
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

name the difference between inductive and deductive reasoning

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Concepts are important for?

A

communication, It makes it easier to communicate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

In what order does the understanding of concepts develop in children?

A

first 5 years physical concepts. later abstract concepts (time, numbers, etc)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

categorisation of concepts is a form of what kind of reasoning?

A

inductive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what are multimodal inferences?

A

combines multiple sources (modalities) of information at once to create a mental representation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

name two forms of experimentation that can be used in children which are unable to speak properly yet to measure categorisation.

17
Q

explain the basics of a habituation experiment in 3-4 month olds.

A
  1. show pictures of f.e horses.
  2. than show picture of horse and dog. Child will look longer at new animal (new stimuli)
18
Q

prototypical: common/familier.

which two things can you conclude about young childrens ability to categorise objects?

A
  1. evidence is mixed regarding the question. Does the superordinate level develop earlier than the basic level.
  2. familier objects (prototypical) are recognized earlier.
19
Q

absence of finding is not equal to absence of ability. What does this mean?

A

The fact that an experiment doesn’t find any proof, doesn’t mean it isn’t true. Maybe the experiment design isn’t sufficient enough

20
Q

what is the difference between thematic relations and categorical relations?

21
Q

what is the difference between characteristic features and defining features?

22
Q

define an analogy. where is it used for?

23
Q

an experiment that shows early causality understanding in children is the expectation violation (gravity) experiment.

  • describe the experiment
  • what where the results?
A

children looked longer at imposible event–>habituation

24
Q

What could explain the difference in results?

A

5-6 years old. both groups are using real world knowledge instead of logic.

25
define **categorisation of concepts**
26
categories allow for which three things?
27
give an example of a **sequential touching task**
toddlers are shown a mix of toy animals and vehicles. They’re told to play freely while researchers observe the order of touches. Clusters of same-category touches (e.g., several animals in a row) suggest categorical thinking.
28
create an example expirement of **matching to sample**
n a matching-to-sample task, a child sees a picture of an apple (the sample). Below it are three images: a banana, a car, and another apple. The child is asked to pick the one that matches the sample. Choosing the second apple shows they understand visual matching. The task can be repeated with colors, shapes, or categories.
29
short example of an expectation violation experiment related to gravity:
An infant watches as a ball rolls off a table but appears to float in midair instead of falling. This violates their basic expectation that unsupported objects fall due to gravity. The infant’s surprised reaction (e.g., longer looking time) is measured. Longer attention suggests they noticed something unexpected. This reveals early understanding of physical laws.
30
create an experiment using the **priority principle experiment**
In a priority principle experiment using a jack-in-the-box, a child watches two events: one person winds the box, and later, another person touches it just after the jack pops out. The child is asked who caused the jack to pop. If the child chooses the one who wound the box first, they’re using the priority principle—the idea that causes happen before effects. This shows early understanding of temporal causality.
31