Week 7 Flashcards

reading + speech perception (34 cards)

1
Q

how can we define language?

A

A shared symbolic system for communication

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

linguistics

A

The discipline that takes language as its topic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

psycholinguistics

A

The study of language as it’s used + learned by people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

reading vs speech perception

A

reading:
- words seen as a whole
- low ambiguity
- rarely distracted by other stimuli
- low cognitive demands
- punctuation main cue

speech perception:
- words spread out over time
- high ambiguity
- adverse conditions in everyday life
- high cognitive demands
- prosodic cues

involves different brain areas (evident from brain damage)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

reading processes

A

Orthography: word spelling
Phonology: word sound
Semantics: word meaning
Syntax + grammar
Higher level discourse integration (Balota et al. 1999)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

research methods: naming task

A

Say printed word out loud as rapidly as possible
Links orthography + phonology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

research methods: lexical decision task

A

Deciding rapidly whether a string of letters forms a word
Links orthography + semantics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

research methods: prime words task

A

Does a word presented before a target word affect processing of the target?
Related in spelling, sound or meaning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

reading

A

Understand + address reading difficulties
Majority of studies consider English Language
Angloscentricites: relationship between spelling + sound
English children learn to read more slowly than children learning a more consistent language (Caravolas et al. 2013)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

phonological processing

A

Do we access sounds when reading words?

  1. Weak phonological model
    Phonological processing is inessential for word identification
  2. Strong phonological model
    Phonological processing central for word identification
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

homophones

A

Evidence consistent with strong model
Homophones: words with one pronunciation, but two spellings
More errors made when word is homophone of real world
Errors suggests engaged in phonological processing (Van Orden, 1987)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

phonological neighbours

A

Phonological neighbours: words that differ in one phoneme
When reading a sentence, look at words with many neighbours for a shorter amount of time
Advantage suggests engaged in phonological processing (Yates et al. 2008)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

phonological priming

A

Phonological priming: words processed faster when prime is phonologically identical
Advantage suggests engaged in phonological processing (Rastle & Brysbaert, 2006)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

phonological processing not essential?

A

However, may not be essential for effective reading
Brain damaged patients can have impaired phonological processing, but still understand the meaning of words

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

word recognition

A

Interactive activation model of visual word processing (McClelland & Rumelhart, 1981)
Recognition units at three levels:
1. Feature level
2. Letter level
3. Word level
Involves parallel processing
Bottom up + top down processes interact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

interactive activation model

A

Model can account for the following:

  1. Word superiority effect
    Target letter readily detected in a letter string when the string forms a word rather than a non-word
  2. Orthographic neighbours
    Words formed by changing one of a target word’s letters and can influence recognition time
    Emphasis on top down processes from word level to letter level
17
Q

word superiority effect

A

Letter string presented briefly follow by mask
Decide which two letters were in a given position
Better when letter string forms a real word

18
Q

orthographic neighbours

A

Words formed by changing one letter in target word
When word presented, neighbour activated
- Neighbours facilitate target word recognition if they are less frequent in language
- Neighbours inhibit target word recognition if they are more frequent in language

19
Q

limitations of IAM

A

Too much importance attached to letter order
E.g most able to read text when first and last letters in correct place but others transposed

20
Q

semantic priming

A

Target word recognised faster if preceded by semantically related word
Two possible explanations:
1. Automatically activates related words due to learning
2. Expectation semantically related word will follow

21
Q

reading aloud

A

Two major theoretical approaches

  1. Dual route model (Coltheart et al. 2001)
    Two routes between printed word + speech
    Activation at one level cascades onto the next
  2. Connectionist triangle model (Plaut et al. 1996)
    Based on highly interactive system between orthography, phonology + semantics
    Semantics plays greater role in reading aloud
22
Q

dual route model

A

route 1: grapheme-phoneme conversion
Convert spelling of a grapheme → phoneme
Permits accurate perception of regular words
Does NOT permit perception of irregular words

route 2: lexicon + semantic knowledge
Familiar words stored in orthographic input lexicon
Printed word activates input lexicon + extract meaning from semantic system
Sound pattern generated in phonological output lexicon

23
Q

connectionist triangle model

A

Two routes from spelling to sound:
2. Direct route between spelling + sound
3. Indirect route via word meaning
Semantics plays a greater role in reading aloud than in dual route model

24
Q

dsylexia

A

Surface dyslexia
Difficulties reading irregular words

Phonological dyslexia
Difficulties reading unfamiliar words + non-words

Deep dyslexia
Difficulties reading unfamiliar words + non-words
Semantic errors

25
surface dsylexia
Difficulties reading irregular words Dual route model Rely on grapheme-phoneme conversion Connectionist triangle model Semantic deficit
26
phonological dsylexia
Difficulties reading unfamiliar words + non-words Dual route model Problems with grapheme-phoneme conversion Connectionist triangle model General phonological deficit not specific to reading
27
deep dsylexia
Difficulties reading unfamiliar words + non-words Semantic errors Dual route model Out of scope of model Use different reading system; based in right hemisphere of brain Connectionist triangle model General phonological deficit not specific to reading
28
brain imaging evidence for routes
Dorsal route: phonologically mediated Ventral route: direct access to word meaning Developmental changes
29
speech perception
A complex process that involves various stages 1. Select signal of interest from irrelevant inputs 2. Extract the elements of interest from the speech signa; 3. Word identification 4. Comprehension + interpretation
30
listening to speech
Must deal with considerable variability in signal Adverse conditions decrease intelligibility Phonemes pronounced in different ways Energetic masking: target degraded in some way Informational masking: effect of cognitive load
31
problem of variability
Not one production of the same sound will be identical; varies between speakers + words Due to co-articulation: more than one sounds are articulated at the same time Loudness also affects phoneme production: voiced phonemes become voiceless during whisper
32
phoneme categories
Some sounds are different but perceived the same Phonemes therefore are the category that are treated as the same, despite physical differences Sounds falling within the boundaries of a category will be perceived as the same; categorical perception Speakers of different languages vary on how they categorise phonemes
33
sentence context
Info that is not provided in the auditory signal includes: - Info provided by a previous input - Top down info provided by knowledge + experience of language Has a rapid influence on speech perception
34