explicit memory tasks will always be contaminated by ____ memories
implicit
free recall + recognition are explicit/implicit?
explicit
filler tasks serve what purpose? why do we wantr this
stopping rehearsal, controlling for short-term memory effects –> force brain to rely on LTM
in free recall, we prompt to recall items present in which phase? what do you need to generate for yourself
encoding
retrieval cues
Godden + Baddeley 1975, wet/dry divers, what does this show about environment as cue FOR RECALL
in absence of strong cues, environment becomes retrieval cue
Gooden + Baddeley 1975, for wet/dry driver why doesn’t the recognition data show an interaction between environment and recall?
in recognition tasks, the items themselves are retrieval cues that override impact of environmental cues
if the orienting task was rhyming (does it [eagle] rhyme with legal?) is memory better when it’s a rhyming cue or semantic? what’s the phenomenon called
rhyming, transfer-appropriate processing
for ‘the fish attacked the swimmer’ is a shark or fish a better retrieval cue?
shark, because the study task implies shark
explicit memory tests assess…
conscious recollection of information, requring intentional retrieval of past experiences/knowledge. you know your memory is being tested
implicit memory tests assess…
unconscious recall of information, influence of past experiences on current behaviour, don’t know memory is being tested
stem, fragment, and perceptual completion all test ___ memory
implicit
T/F: amnesics can gain new procedural skills and show evidence of implicit memory
T
T/F amnesics perform worse on word stem completion than control, but the same as control on recognition and free recall
F - they’re fine at word stem completion, they’re worse at free recall and recognition than control
ramponi 2010, manipulating emotional/neutral associates, phonemic/semantic encoding, explicit/implicit recall. for explicit, semantically was remembered better overall (T/F), and emotional was remembered better only for explicit (T/F)
TT
Ramponi 2010, does emotionality affect implicit memory
no
deeply processing items only maes you perform better in explicit/implicit tests
explicit
Weldon + Roediger -
* did people encoding as pictures or words do better for free recall
* did people encoding as pictures or words do better on word completion
what does this say about implicit memory
implicit memory is modality-specific, and priming is stronger when encoding and retrieval match
Jacoby 1983, general trajectory for implicit/explicit memory across no context cue, context, generate
recognition (explicit) –> when there’s no context at all, explicit memory is bad. When given context, better. Generate, even better /
perceptial ID (implicit) –> no context = best, context = worse, generate = worst \
Roediger memory process account: memory is best when encoding matches/doesn’t match retrieval, so the kind of things working well for implicit but not explicit are just the kind of things that match up well w ____ memory tasks
implicit
deep encoding focuses on the ____ not the ____
meaning, structure
the extent to which encoding and retrieval processes match leads to better/worse memory
better
Jacoby 1993 experiment, why did people do worse on the implicit memory task in the generate condition
they never saw the stimulus
outline the processing account of memory
explicit + implicit memory aren’t differnt memory systems but the tasks just involve different memory retrieval processes - recollection vs familiarity
remember-know procedure Gardiner + Java posit that ‘yes’ responses in cognition are really the sum of what 3 things
recollection (actually remembering) + familiarity (knowing) + guessing