Chapter 3 Flashcards

(36 cards)

1
Q

What is social epidemiology?

A

Branch of epidemiology that studies how social position and context affect human health.

4 features:
1. Population level perspective
2. Social context of behaviour
3. Multi level analyses
4. Development and life course perspective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is classical epidemiology?

A

Clinical epidemiology
Focus on host and agent model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the difference between social and classical epidemiology?

A

Social epidemiology:
- Population level perspective
- Social context of behaviour
- Health is determined by social context
- Balance of opportunities and constraints

  • Analytical approaches include pop. attributes, individual level outcomes, multilevel analysis, human development and life course perspectives
  • Time as a factor include cumulative effects, delayed effects (childhood infant circumstances predict adult outcomes)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is body mass index?

A

Follow s a normal distribution

A measure of obesity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is psychosomatic illnesses?

A

A physical condition such as pain or immobility arising from emotional factors such as stress, anxiety or depression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is social epidemics?

A

Rapid spread of symptoms. Y a process of emotional contagion within a social network

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are prospective cohort studies?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does gradient in health mean?

A

Near universal finding that health and life expectancy improve and disease incidence falls as income, education level, quality of job or quality of neighborhood rise.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What does OECD stand for?

A

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the Health Utilities Index?

A

A technique for measuring and comparing health related quality of life through aggregating the results of questionnaires across different dimensions like pain, mobility and emotional state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What developments in the 70s lead to the development of social epidemiology?

A
  • Friendships, social support (Berkman & Syme)
  • Partner effects
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are partner effects?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What developments in the 90s paved the way for social epidemiology?

A

Susser and Susser found that we need to consider contextual variables in epidemiology

Broader notions of health that trace disease to insurance status, attitudes and living environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are 2 examples of how health is tied to social context?

A
  1. Broken heart syndrome vs. socially constructed
  2. Brain development and endocrinology are socially sensitive
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Why is high risk a bad term?

A

Cutoffs between healthy and unhealthy statuses are arbitrary and difficult to determine

Meanings vary across populations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Why are the distributional characteristics of health important?

A

Many people at low risk —> more cases of disease

Concentration in middle of distribution

A focus on high risk people will do little to the overall group

Moving the whole distribution would reduce the number of people at high risk

17
Q

What are exceptions?

A

HIV —> Gay people and IV drug users are impacted most

18
Q

What are Rose’s paradoxes

A
  • Treating high risk people will do little to impact population health
  • Individual level approach will impact little of population risk
  • Population level approach will impact little of individual risk
19
Q

How are driving accidents an example of Rose’s paradoxes in action?

A

Most risky drivers avoid accidents

Low risk drivers cause most accidents

20
Q

What are the implications of Rose’s paradoxes?

A

Pop. Approach is better where risk is small and widespread

Solution: More than mean average

21
Q

What are Rose’s conclusions?

A

Traditional risk factor approach
- fails to address majority of cases
- fails to address root causes
- fails to understand human behaviour
- Fails to incorporate an adequate concept of causality

22
Q

Describe the Whitehall studies

A

Traditional risk factors account for no more than 40% of variation in heart disease

Gradient in health

23
Q

Describe the Black Report

A

Huge growing gap in health between rich and poor

No progress in closing gap despite welfare program creation and NHS

24
Q

Describe Wilkinson’s work

A

Comparative cross national analysis of wealthy countries

Income inequality matters more

Findings contradictory but remain influential

25
Describe the educational gradient in health
Not just income or occupation Explanations: - Direct effects of education - Indirect effects - More intellectually stimulating environment - Mediating influence of income - Inclusive uni admissions have done little to close gap and lessen gradient Influence is likely to be pervasive in everyday life Not just smoking but multiple mechanisms
26
Describe materialist hypothesis
Resources at the individual level explain why income inequality matters Access to goods
27
Describe neo-materialist hypothesis
Must include public resources, services and tax policy among resources Public resources are better in Canada than in US Preferred explanation
28
Describe psychosocial hypothesis
Status differentials matter Competition, envy Chronic stress is the mediator Resources matter for poor countries —> parasitic/infectious disease Status differentials matter for rich countries —> chronic
29
Give an example of how the biomedical approach would look at the determinants of obesity
Genetic predisposition Energy inputs/outputs Low or high birth weight
30
How would the biomedical approach look at obesity prevention/treatment?
Gene therapy Drugs Surgery
31
How would the behavioural variant view determinants of obesity?
Inactivity Excess consumption of high energy foods
32
How would the behavioural variant view obesity treatment/prevention?
Increase minutes of moderate to vigorous exercise Change diet to low glycemic index foods
33
How does population health view obesity determinants?
Industrial food production Subsidies Taxation regime Corporate advertising and promotion
34
What can be done to prevent/treat obesity at the population health level?
Community based food policies Regulation of food industry Improved working conditions, income, housing, and community amenities
35
Describe the conceptual model of health
Health is impacted by the interplay of socioeconomic status, biology, place, social interaction, and risk factors
36
What conclusions can be drawn from Chapter 3?
Social epidemiology offers better solutions at the population level - Best to shift the mean of a distribution rather than focus on one tail (with exceptions) Social gradients of health are a key concept - Matter at each level up - apply to multiple forms of status Larger theoretical debate