different situations demand different kinds of leadership
situational approach
the behavior pattern of a person who attempts to influence others
leadership style
help individuals + group members accomplish goals by giving directions, establishing goals + methods of evaluation, setting timelines, defining roles, + showing how the goals are to be achieved
directive behaviors
help individuals + group members feel comfortable about themselves, their coworkers, + the situation
supportive behaviors
leader focuses communication on goal achievement, + spends smaller amount of time using support behaviors
S1 (LS, HD) directing style
leader focuses on communication on both achieving goals + inventing followers’ socioemotional needs
S2(HD,HS) coaching approach
leader does not focus exclusively on goals but uses supportive behaviors that bring out followers’ skills around the goal to be accomplished
S3(HS,LD) supporting approach
leader offers less goal input + social support, facilitating followers’ confidence + motivation in reference to the goal
S4 (LS,LD) delegating approach
the degree to which followers have the competence + commitment necessary to accomplish a given goal or activity
development level
developed to explain how leaders motivate followers to be productive + satisfied with their work
path goal theory
motivate-> capable-> efforts-> outcome->rewards
expectancy theory
a leader who gives followers instructions about their task, including what is expected of them, how it is to be done, + the timeline for when it should be completed
directive leadership
being friendly + approachable as a leader + includes attending to the well-being + human needs of followers
supportive leadership
inviting followers to share in the decision making
participative leadership
a leader who challenges followers to perform work at the highest level possible
achievement-oriented leadership
trait approach stengths
-intuitively appealing
-credibility due to a century of research support
-highlights leadership component in the leadership process
-provides benchmarks for what to look for in a leader
task approach criticisms
-fails to delimit a definitive list of leadership traits
-doesn’t take into account situational effects
-list of most important leadership traits is highly subjective
-research on traits in relation to objective leadership outcomes has found relatively weak relationships
-not useful for training and development
behavioral approach strengths
-major shift in leadership research from exclusively trait focused to include behaviors and actions
-broad range of studies on leadership style validates and gives credibility to the basic tenets of the approach
-at conceptual level, a leaders style is composed of two major types of behaviors: task and relationship
-heuristic (leaders can learn a lot about themselves and how they come across to others by trying to see their behaviors in light of the task and relationship dimensions
behavioral approach criticisms
-research has not adequately demonstrated how leaders’ styles are associated with performance outcomes
-no universal style of leadership that could be effective in almost every situation
-implies that the most effective leadership style is High-High, limited support
set broad objectives and act as advisor/coach
delegating style
share ideas and facilitate shared decision making process
participating style
explain reasons for decisions and encourage questions
selling style
provide specific instructions and closely supervise
telling style
assumes effective leaders can change behavioral orientation
situational leadership