I Advised...

Question 1

1. IC7 - Drafted prelims

Answer 1

Containing site specific info

Question 2

2. Tyseley - drafted EOI prior to tendering

Answer 2

EOI with 5 contractors, 2 of which declined

Question 3

3. Data Centre - prepped tender packs, bespoke pricing template

Answer 3

Inc cover letter, and made a bespoke pricing template

Question 4

4. Havant - Advised architect and client to draw up sketch to show where welfare facilities could go on site. wrote prelims, and raised a query that there is not detail on welfare facilities location.

Answer 4

Helped come to an agreement on best way forward, as there was another contractor, and landlord may have pushed back

Question 5

5. Data Centre - analysed uplift from framework rates on tender return and advised client of costs.

Answer 5

Subsantiation was requested and costs negotiated with supplier

Question 6

6. S278 - advised on doing a retendering process to provide cost certainty, as tender came back higher

Answer 6

a. PTE was more in line with retenders, and reduced cost of initial tenderer.

Question 7

7. S278 - during tender process I made clarification logs and advised client of resolution to disputes

Answer 7

a. To ensure fair tendering process
b. I advised the client through clarification and query meetings, and an interim and final tender report

Question 8

8. Data Centre - Scoring matrix, qual and quant assessment, with help from design team, and provided recommendations to my client on outcome in this report.

Answer 8

a. To form tender recommendation and assess returns, as well as level those returns

Question 9

1. Medical Physics - clients dashboard was inputted to report to board level, adjusted contingency and risks, maintaining a change control tracker.

Answer 9

To ensure clear communication of facts and figures

Question 10

2. Havant - adjusted PSums during construction, i.e. plant deck. Financial reports bi weekly, and agreed and reported on variations

Answer 10

To ensure client was aware of expenditure and money left

Question 11

3. Havant - Final Account agreement

Answer 11

To avoid future disputes and close out the contract

Question 12

4. Enabling Works - Advised client on spending on monthly basis, and found an error with contractor cashflow which showed they were behind, and advised client on lack of expenditure.

Answer 12

a. Could be a risk to client, did deeper digging, but the contractor had just hit some things that slowed progress

Question 13

5. Medical Physics - Variation control template was used, I advised contractor how to sue it and the whole process to be adhered to throughout construction.

Answer 13

a. To ensure communication, and avoid delays and disputes

Question 14

6. Dental Hospital - issued financial statements and cashflows, advising on monthly changes and key risks. I made and presented a dashboard for the client which they used to present to board level.

Answer 14

a. Allowed board members to disseminate high level project information

Question 15

1. Tyseley - produced order of cost estimates and formal cost plans from RIBA 1 to 4, using NRM 1 and 2

Answer 15

Throughout RIBA stages as design developed

Question 16

2. Worcester Breast Unit - valued works using a BQ, and used this to value variations. Client wanted to change floor finish in reception from carpet to vinyl, which I negotiated and informed the CA of these costs

Answer 16

used Bill rates for Omission, and basis of new rate

Question 17

3. Southport - produced a schedule of works template for contractor to use to price

Answer 17

So it offered comparison between tenders

Question 18

4. Enabling Works - quantified and valued topsoil removal during valuations, and agreed final account

Answer 18

To ensure accurate valuation of works done to reduce financial risk to client

Question 19

5. Advised colleague on use of NRM to produce a cost plan, NRM1 would be suited, while using COMP6 as basis.

Answer 19

to ensure right measurement principle was used

Question 20

6. Data Centre - framework and tendered rates, I advised client that a specific template should be made and included in the tender which included the framework rates, with areas for vendors to input price increases.

Answer 20

a. Improved transparency, substantiation

Question 21

1. Medical Physics - acted as EA, issued certificates, partial and sectional, released retention. I followed clients proformas, and stuck to interim valuation dates

Answer 21

To follow contract and ensure less risk to client

Question 22

2. Windows Replacement - agreed on vesting of materials, and valued these

Answer 22

To reduce risk to client in event of contractor insolvency, and proper vesting of materials

Question 23

3. Rugby Utilities - Acted as CA (MW contract), and valued works in line with milestone payments.

Answer 23

To ensure timely payment, and reduce risk. As per contract

Question 24

1. Dental Hospital - chaired and facilitated risk workshops as QS, and assessed risks, advising on cost updates of risks

Answer 24

To enable clients contingency to be revisited

Question 25

2.      Date Centre - managed risk of lead In times of equipment using dates. Advised client of current risks in weekly catch ups.

Answer 25

To manage risk of equipment delivery on key project, highlighting escalations and where support is required

Question 26

3.      Havant - structural engineer warned roof structure was not strong enough to hold mechanical plant and suggested a structure would be required. I advised client that due to timescales and the time for the tenderer to price this mid/post tender item, to include a PSum in the contract.

Answer 26

Due to timescales a Psum was included in contract, with design just about completed to stage 4

Question 27

1.      Data Centre - EOT on tender, advised to meet deadline, and distributed queries to all vendors.

Answer 27

a.      To ensure fair tendering strategies, as per RICS guidance on tendering, and general procurement regulations.

Question 28

2.      Data Centre - Advised on quantitative and qualitative scoring matrix to be separate.

Answer 28

a.      Due to any unconscious bias that could come with scoring them holistically.

Question 29

3.      Advised colleague on receiving gifts.

Answer 29

a.      Due to RICS policy and RLB policy on accepting gifts and risk of bribery.

Question 30

1.      IC7 - chaired VE workshop

Answer 30

Facilitated VE process

Question 31

2.      Cromwell - viability assessment then cost plan

Answer 31

through different design stages

Question 32

3.      Tyseley - initial cost plan to PTE, highlighting areas of increase cost (additional demo, forming openings, ramp)

Answer 32

through different design stages

Question 33

4.      Moreton - Abnormal’s cost plan, using rates in house data, RIBA stage 3

Answer 33

in house rates, for example cotswold stone façade

Question 34

5.      S278 - PTE, 2 adopting authorities, significant traffic management prelims.

Answer 34

a.      Due to the different sections, logistics of works etc.

Question 35

6.      Southport - initial cost plan, then due to inflation and scope increase advised client costs had increased through reproducing a cost plan.

Answer 35

a.      Due to scope and inflation increase.

Question 36

7.      Bankfield lane - analysed third party order of cost estimate, recommendations on excavation and disposal, suggesting further investigation is required. (possible to sell material on muck market), design wasn’t clear about quantities.)

Answer 36

a.      Design didn’t have the detail.

Question 37

2.      S278 PTE - measured carriageway, drainage etc, different spec by authorities, found a clash between levels on drawings (matching up with the wider development), resulting in shortfall of excavation required.

Answer 37

advised designers to look into this as it seems its an error (two different designers designed different sections)

Question 38

3.      Measurement of SUDS and surface water systems.

Answer 38

Excavation using transects

Question 39

4.      Made assumptions in cost plans on build up of carriageways when information is lacking.

Answer 39

a.      Due to limited design information.

Question 40

5.      Horsham - made assumption on CBR (3%), on similar greenfield sites, due to lack of GI, to inform build-up of carriageway. Also allowed for depths of drainage and utilities when not known

Answer 40

a.      Due to lack of design information.

Question 41

6.      Cromwell - GI report highlighted poor ground, advised on cost of different foundation solutions.

Answer 41

a.      Advised this because the GI report highlighted foundations may be required, and needed to include allowance in cost plan based on scenarios.

Question 42

1.      T&L centre - wrote prelims and contract docs

Answer 42

Using NBS Chorus, using contract amendments

Question 43

2.      IC7 - drafted contract with contract amendments (12 month rectification, 21 days payment terms)

Answer 43

And issued to client and contractor for signing

Question 44

3.      Havant - PC, drafted the final account statement and penultimate valuation.

Answer 44

Agreed and negotiated it, getting both parties to sign it

Question 45

4.      IC7 - advised use of PCG and Performance Bond, insurance option A.

Answer 45

a.      As it was a new build and Employer wasn’t confident in insurance

Question 46

5.      S278 - advised on use of LAD’s regarding sections of works, as well as sectional sums.

Answer 46

a.      As there was a wider development to consider/loss of profit

Question 47

6.      Medical Physics Bunker - advised contractor on valuation timescales, and managed change control procedure.

Answer 47

a.      Due to amended contract dates.

Question 48

7.      Havant - recommended the use of the JCT ICD, due to retaining design control on completed architectural design and handing risk of uncompleted M&E design to contractor.

Answer 48

a.      Because there was no time to wait for M&E design/risk allocation